Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Perfect Bibliographic Record: Platonic Ideal, Rhetorical Strategy or Nonsense?

The Perfect Bibliographic Record: Platonic Ideal, Rhetorical Strategy or Nonsense? Discussions of quality in library catalogs and bibliographic databases often refer to “the perfect record.” This paper examines the usage of that phrase in the library literature, finding that its predominant use is as a rhetorical strategy for reducing the complex and context-dependent issue of quality to an absurdity, thus permitting the author to ignore or dismiss all issues of quality. Five documents in which the phrase is not used in this fashion are examined and their value for understanding the inextricably intertwined values of quantity and quality are discussed. The author recommends rejecting both the rhetoric of “the perfect record” and satisfaction with “the imperfect record.” http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cataloging & Classification Quarterly Taylor & Francis

The Perfect Bibliographic Record: Platonic Ideal, Rhetorical Strategy or Nonsense?

Cataloging & Classification Quarterly , Volume 46 (1): 25 – Mar 1, 2008
25 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-perfect-bibliographic-record-platonic-ideal-rhetorical-strategy-or-AirAkyp5EV

References (27)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1544-4554
eISSN
0163-9374
DOI
10.1080/01639370802183081
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Discussions of quality in library catalogs and bibliographic databases often refer to “the perfect record.” This paper examines the usage of that phrase in the library literature, finding that its predominant use is as a rhetorical strategy for reducing the complex and context-dependent issue of quality to an absurdity, thus permitting the author to ignore or dismiss all issues of quality. Five documents in which the phrase is not used in this fashion are examined and their value for understanding the inextricably intertwined values of quantity and quality are discussed. The author recommends rejecting both the rhetoric of “the perfect record” and satisfaction with “the imperfect record.”

Journal

Cataloging & Classification QuarterlyTaylor & Francis

Published: Mar 1, 2008

Keywords: Metadata quality; database quality; cataloging standards

There are no references for this article.