Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
A N G E L A K I j o u r n a l o f th e th e o r e t ic a l h u m a n i ti e s v o lu m e 6 n u m b e r 2 a u g u s t 2 00 1 sually, Christianity is seen as suppressing UÒmoral luck,Ó or the idea that, to a degree at least, we require good fortune if we are to be good. However, in this essay, I want to argue, to the contrary, that Christianity embraces moral luck to such an extreme degree that it transforms all received ideas of the ethical. In the course of this argument, I shall try to show that these received ideas of the ethical, which may or may not permit some play to Òmoral luck,Ó all subscribe to a Òsacrificial economy.Ó And that they do so in two different variants: either in john milbank terms of the giving up of the lesser for the greater, or else of a more radical notion of absolute sacrifice of self for the other, without THE MIDWINTE R any ÒreturnÓ for, or of,
Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities – Taylor & Francis
Published: Aug 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.