Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Sex Differences in the Eyes of Expert Personality Assessors: Unwarranted Conclusions

Sex Differences in the Eyes of Expert Personality Assessors: Unwarranted Conclusions Summary: In a recent paper, Haan and Livson reported sex differences between male and female psychologists in their evaluations of adult men and adult women. Their conclusions have implication for the validity of clinical, assessments and were interpreted in terms of stereotypic sex rote perceptions. However, their statistical analysis was in fundamental error. When the data they employed were reanalyzed, no reliable sex differences between men and women psychologists were found, a finding in accord with a number of previous investigations of this problem. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Personality Assessment Taylor & Francis

Sex Differences in the Eyes of Expert Personality Assessors: Unwarranted Conclusions

Journal of Personality Assessment , Volume 39 (2): 4 – Apr 1, 1975

Sex Differences in the Eyes of Expert Personality Assessors: Unwarranted Conclusions

Journal of Personality Assessment , Volume 39 (2): 4 – Apr 1, 1975

Abstract

Summary: In a recent paper, Haan and Livson reported sex differences between male and female psychologists in their evaluations of adult men and adult women. Their conclusions have implication for the validity of clinical, assessments and were interpreted in terms of stereotypic sex rote perceptions. However, their statistical analysis was in fundamental error. When the data they employed were reanalyzed, no reliable sex differences between men and women psychologists were found, a finding in accord with a number of previous investigations of this problem.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/sex-differences-in-the-eyes-of-expert-personality-assessors-b8EvMZovc0

References (3)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1532-7752
eISSN
0022-3891
DOI
10.1207/s15327752jpa3902_2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary: In a recent paper, Haan and Livson reported sex differences between male and female psychologists in their evaluations of adult men and adult women. Their conclusions have implication for the validity of clinical, assessments and were interpreted in terms of stereotypic sex rote perceptions. However, their statistical analysis was in fundamental error. When the data they employed were reanalyzed, no reliable sex differences between men and women psychologists were found, a finding in accord with a number of previous investigations of this problem.

Journal

Journal of Personality AssessmentTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 1, 1975

There are no references for this article.