Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Self-Assessment Against Business Excellence Models: A Critiqueand Perspective

Self-Assessment Against Business Excellence Models: A Critiqueand Perspective Abstract Many organisations have attempted to improve their performance through self-assessment using business excellence models such as the Malcolm Baldrige Model and the European Excellence Model. Recently, however, many have become dissatisfied with this practice. This paper examines why self-assessment using these models might no longer be relevant and useful unless the models and the way they are being used is revised. We review both the academic and practical validity of the models and their procedures, on the basis of the published literature and the authors' own personal experience. The conclusions are that the academic validity of these business excellence models still leaves much to be desired and the business environment has changed considerably since the conception of the models in the late 1980s, such that their practical validity can be called into question. It is suggested that the original models might still be a useful guide to improvement but only for organisations whose conformance quality is poor. More advanced organisations should choose their own relevant dimensions and weightings rather than use any standard one-size-fits-all model with more attention being paid to the processes by which their own business models and strategy are developed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Total Quality Management & Business Excellence Taylor & Francis

Self-Assessment Against Business Excellence Models: A Critiqueand Perspective

14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/self-assessment-against-business-excellence-models-a-critiqueand-Z06fFw7NCC

References (34)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1478-3371
eISSN
1478-3363
DOI
10.1080/14783360600753737
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Many organisations have attempted to improve their performance through self-assessment using business excellence models such as the Malcolm Baldrige Model and the European Excellence Model. Recently, however, many have become dissatisfied with this practice. This paper examines why self-assessment using these models might no longer be relevant and useful unless the models and the way they are being used is revised. We review both the academic and practical validity of the models and their procedures, on the basis of the published literature and the authors' own personal experience. The conclusions are that the academic validity of these business excellence models still leaves much to be desired and the business environment has changed considerably since the conception of the models in the late 1980s, such that their practical validity can be called into question. It is suggested that the original models might still be a useful guide to improvement but only for organisations whose conformance quality is poor. More advanced organisations should choose their own relevant dimensions and weightings rather than use any standard one-size-fits-all model with more attention being paid to the processes by which their own business models and strategy are developed.

Journal

Total Quality Management & Business ExcellenceTaylor & Francis

Published: Dec 1, 2006

Keywords: Excellence/quality models; self-assessment; quality management

There are no references for this article.