Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Glaser, Kirsten Deane (1999)
Normalisation in an Abnormal World: A Study of Prisoners with an Intellectual DisabilityInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43
David Thompson, H. Brown (1997)
Men with Intellectual Disabilities Who Sexually Abuse: A Review of the LiteratureJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10
R. Cummins, A. Lau (2003)
Community Integration or Community Exposure? A Review and Discussion in Relation to People with an Intellectual DisabilityJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16
D. Elliott, D. Huizinga, Suzanne Ageton (1985)
Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use
D. Boer, S. Tough, James Haaven (2004)
Assessment of Risk Manageability of Intellectually Disabled Sex OffendersJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
R. Langevin, Scott Pope (1993)
Working with learning disabled sex offendersAnnals of sex research, 6
(1990)
The Life Experience Checklist. Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Disabilities
K. Day (1994)
Male Mentally Handicapped Sex OffendersBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 165
William Lindsay, J. Law, K. Quinn, Nicola Smart, Anne Smith (2001)
A comparison of physical and sexual abuse: histories of sexual and non-sexual offenders with intellectual disability.Child abuse & neglect, 25 7
H. Sequeira, S. Hollins (2003)
Clinical effects of sexual abuse on people with learning disability: critical literature review.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 182
M. Power, L. Champion, S. Aris (1988)
The development of a measure of social support: the Significant Others (SOS) Scale.The British journal of clinical psychology, 27 ( Pt 4)
S. McElroy, H. Pope (1998)
Sex OffendersScience, 279
S. Smallbone, M. Dadds (1998)
Childhood Attachment and Adult Attachment in Incarcerated Adult Male Sex OffendersJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 13
V. Quinsey, A. Book, T. Skilling (2004)
A Follow‐up of Deinstitutionalized Men with Intellectual Disabilities and Histories of Antisocial BehaviourJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
K. Heilbrun (1998)
Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk.Psychiatric Services, 51
Fiona Marsa, G. O’Reilly, A. Carr, P. Murphy, Maura O'Sullivan, Anthony Cotter, D. Hevey (2004)
Attachment Styles and Psychological Profiles of Child Sex Offenders in IrelandJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 19
N. Beail, S. Warden (1995)
Sexual abuse of adults with learning disabilities.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 39 ( Pt 5)
T. Hirschi (1970)
Causes of Delinquency.British medical journal, 2 4674
C. Bigby (2004)
But why are these questions being asked?: a commentary on Emerson (2004)Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29
Christina Saltaris (2002)
Psychopathy in juvenile offenders. Can temperament and attachment be considered as robust developmental precursors?Clinical psychology review, 22 5
W. Lindsay (2005)
Model underpinning treatment for sex offenders with mild intellectual disability: current theories of sex offending.Mental retardation, 43 6
W. Lindsay, Anne Smith, J. Law, K. Quinn, A. Anderson, Astrid Smith, R. Allan (2004)
Sexual and Nonsexual Offenders With Intellectual and Learning DisabilitiesJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 19
W. Lindsay, Susan Elliot, A. Astell (2004)
Predictors of Sexual Offence Recidivism in Offenders with Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
AbstractBackground Hayes (1991) and Day (1994) have developed hypotheses about the importance of social and developmental variables in the aetiology of sexual offences in offenders with intellectual disability. The present study is the first of its kind to investigate the perceived quality of life and relationships of sex offenders in comparison to an appropriate control group.Method A group of 28 sex offenders with intellectual disability (ID) were compared with 28 members of a control group of individuals with ID. All participants completed the Significant Others Scale (SOS) which assesses self‐perceptions of potential and ideal support from significant others in the individual's life, and the Life Experience Checklist (LEC) which assesses experiences and opportunities across 5 living domains: home, leisure, freedom, relationships and opportunities.Results There were no differences between the groups on age and IQ. On the SOS there were no differences between the groups on the number of times each significant other was reported. Actual and ideal levels of support from both mother and father were lower for sex offenders than the control group. On the LEC, sex offenders reported lower scores on the relationships and leisure sections.Conclusions Poorer relationships and little indication of any wish to change that state of affairs suggests lower levels of integration and identification with society for sex offenders compared with the control group.
Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability – Taylor & Francis
Published: Mar 1, 2006
Keywords: Quality of life; relationship; sex offender; intellectual disability
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.