Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Motivation to Learn and Understand: On Taking Charge of One's Own Learning

Motivation to Learn and Understand: On Taking Charge of One's Own Learning COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1988,5(4), 31 1-321 Copyright o 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Motivation to Learn and Understand: On Taking Charge of One's Own Learning Ann L. Brown University of California at Berkeley My comments on Susan Bobbitt Nolen's article (this issue) are not intended to serve as a critique, but rather to welcome research of this nature to the journal. Cognition and Instruction is still in its infancy, but it has already made a major impact in defining the field. It publishes high-quality research dedicated to important issues of educational significance. Unfortunately, due to the pattern of submissions, by far the majority of articles have focused on learning and teaching mathematics. This bias reflects the fact that many outstanding scientists are working on the cognitive science approach to learning mathematics and science, but it was never the editors' intention to limit coverage in this way. And, therefore, Nolen's article is a welcome addition. Motivational aspects of learning have by and large been ignored by many who see themselves as cognitive scientists, and this omission needs to be rectified. In 1983, my colleagues and I, reviewing the state of the art in developmental cognition, concluded a 228-page manu- script http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cognition and Instruction Taylor & Francis

Motivation to Learn and Understand: On Taking Charge of One's Own Learning

Cognition and Instruction , Volume 5 (4): 11 – Dec 1, 1988

Motivation to Learn and Understand: On Taking Charge of One's Own Learning

Cognition and Instruction , Volume 5 (4): 11 – Dec 1, 1988

Abstract

COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1988,5(4), 31 1-321 Copyright o 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Motivation to Learn and Understand: On Taking Charge of One's Own Learning Ann L. Brown University of California at Berkeley My comments on Susan Bobbitt Nolen's article (this issue) are not intended to serve as a critique, but rather to welcome research of this nature to the journal. Cognition and Instruction is still in its infancy, but it has already made a major impact in defining the field. It publishes high-quality research dedicated to important issues of educational significance. Unfortunately, due to the pattern of submissions, by far the majority of articles have focused on learning and teaching mathematics. This bias reflects the fact that many outstanding scientists are working on the cognitive science approach to learning mathematics and science, but it was never the editors' intention to limit coverage in this way. And, therefore, Nolen's article is a welcome addition. Motivational aspects of learning have by and large been ignored by many who see themselves as cognitive scientists, and this omission needs to be rectified. In 1983, my colleagues and I, reviewing the state of the art in developmental cognition, concluded a 228-page manu- script

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/motivation-to-learn-and-understand-on-taking-charge-of-one-apos-s-own-KX0EC8PD4R

References (22)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1532-690X
eISSN
0737-0008
DOI
10.1207/s1532690xci0504_4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1988,5(4), 31 1-321 Copyright o 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Motivation to Learn and Understand: On Taking Charge of One's Own Learning Ann L. Brown University of California at Berkeley My comments on Susan Bobbitt Nolen's article (this issue) are not intended to serve as a critique, but rather to welcome research of this nature to the journal. Cognition and Instruction is still in its infancy, but it has already made a major impact in defining the field. It publishes high-quality research dedicated to important issues of educational significance. Unfortunately, due to the pattern of submissions, by far the majority of articles have focused on learning and teaching mathematics. This bias reflects the fact that many outstanding scientists are working on the cognitive science approach to learning mathematics and science, but it was never the editors' intention to limit coverage in this way. And, therefore, Nolen's article is a welcome addition. Motivational aspects of learning have by and large been ignored by many who see themselves as cognitive scientists, and this omission needs to be rectified. In 1983, my colleagues and I, reviewing the state of the art in developmental cognition, concluded a 228-page manu- script

Journal

Cognition and InstructionTaylor & Francis

Published: Dec 1, 1988

There are no references for this article.