Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Meinzer, D. Grantz (1989)
Stomatal control of transpiration from a developing sugarcane canopyPlant Cell and Environment, 12
W. Ehrler, S. Idso, R. Jackson, R. Reginato (1978)
Wheat Canopy Temperature: Relation to Plant Water Potential1Agronomy Journal, 70
B. Navalawala (1991)
Waterlogging and its Related Issues in IndiaIrrigation and Power Journal, 48
(1988)
Soil moisture stress effect on CO2 assimilation, nutrient concentration and juice quality of sugarcane
(2003)
Studies on effect of irrigation schedule and nitrogen on tomato fruit yield, fertiliser use efficiency, moisture stress in drip and surface method of irrigation
D. Cox, K. Gomez, A. Gómez (1984)
Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80
R. Singandhupe, G. Rao, N. Patil, P. Brahmanand (2003)
Fertigation studies and irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system in tomato crop (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)European Journal of Agronomy, 19
(2001)
Micro irrigation system – past, present and future
M. Robertson, R. Muchow, R. Donaldson, N. Inman-Bamber, A. Wood (1999)
Estimating the risk associated with drying-off strategies for irrigated sugarcane before harvestCrop & Pasture Science, 50
(1986)
4.3 - FertilizationDevelopments in Agricultural Engineering, 9
W. Langford (1959)
Statistical MethodsNature, 184
R. Wiedenfeld (1995)
Effects of irrigation and N fertilizer application on sugarcane yield and quality.Field Crops Research, 43
F. Meinzer, D. Grantz (1990)
Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity*Plant Cell and Environment, 13
K. Kwong, J. Paúl, J. Deville (1999)
DRIP-FERTIGATION – A MEANS FOR REDUCING FERTILIZER NITROGEN TO SUGARCANEExperimental Agriculture, 35
(1992)
Planning and management of irrigation systems in the developing countries
(1997)
Nitrogen management in intensive agriculture
(1986)
Management principle: Fertilisation
P. Singh, S. Mohan (1994)
Water use and yield response of sugarcane under different irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels in a subtropical regionAgricultural Water Management, 26
(1988)
Effect of water stress on sugarcane stalk growth and quality
J. Doorenbos, W. Pruitt (1977)
Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements
Dr. Dasberg, D. Or (1999)
Drip Irrigation
(2001)
Emerging scenario of micro irrigation in India
(1994)
Benchmarking yield of sugarcane from estimate of water use
B. Wiedenfeld, J. Enciso (2008)
Sugarcane Responses to Irrigation and Nitrogen in Semiarid South TexasAgronomy Journal, 100
R. Slatyer (2008)
The significance of the permanent wilting percentage in studies of plant and soil water relationsThe Botanical Review, 3
(1949)
Plant and soil water relation
(1986)
Trickle irrigation for crop production
J. Kjelgaard, C. Stockle, R. Evans (1996)
Accuracy of canopy temperature energy balance for determining daily evapotranspirationIrrigation Science, 16
(1968)
How to improve the sugar content of cane
R. Muchow, M. Robertson, A. Wood, B. Keating (1996)
Effect of nitrogen on the time-course of sucrose accumulation in sugarcaneField Crops Research, 47
(1994)
Future research challenges for efficient crop water use in sugarcane production
R. Ohir (1994)
Agro-Ecological Regions of IndiaJournal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 42
The present study on drip irrigation in sugarcane was undertaken to assess crop yield, quality of juice, nutrient uptake and its utilization efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency, and soil moisture status for two crop years at the Research Farm of Water Management, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidhyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra (long. 19°45′ to 19°57′ north; lat. 74°18′ to 74°65′ east), India. Drip irrigation at 2-, 3-, and 4-day intervals produced 20, 16 and 13% higher cane yield than furrow irrigation at 75 mm cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) in which the cane yield was 131.4 t ha−1. During the crop growth period, soil moisture depletion was 34–46% in furrow-irrigated treatment and 5–20% in drip-irrigated treatment. Similarly, 108% higher irrigation water use efficiency was achieved in 2-day drip irrigation over furrow irrigation in which the irrigation water efficiency was 787 kg ha−1 cm. Fertilization through drip improved agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency, and apparent recovery considerably more than furrow irrigation.
Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science – Taylor & Francis
Published: Dec 1, 2008
Keywords: fertilization; drip irrigation; apparent recovery; agronomic efficiency; irrigation water use efficiency; stomatal resistance; sugarcane
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.