Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge translation

Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge... AbstractPurpose: To evaluate the impact of knowledge translation (KT) on factors influencing virtual reality (VR) adoption and to identify support needs of therapists. Hypotheses: Intervention will be associated with improvements in therapists' perceived ease of use and self-efficacy, and an associated increase in intentions to use VR. Method: Single group mixed-methods pre-test–post-test evaluation of convenience sample of physical, occupational and rehabilitation therapists (n=37) from two brain injury rehabilitation centres. ADOPT-VR administered pre/post KT intervention, consisting of interactive education, clinical manual, technical and clinical support. Results: Increases in perceived ease of use (p=0.000) and self-efficacy (p=0.001), but not behavioural intention to use VR (p=0.158) were found following KT, along with decreases in the frequency of perceived barriers. Post-test changes in the frequency and nature of perceived facilitators and barriers were evident, with increased emphasis on peer influence, organisational-level supports and client factors. Additional support needs were related to clinical reasoning, treatment programme development, technology selection and troubleshooting. Conclusions: KT strategies hold potential for targeting therapists’ perceptions of low self-efficacy and ease of use of this technology. Changes in perceived barriers, facilitators and support needs at post-test demonstrated support for repeated evaluation and multi-phased training initiatives to address therapists’ needs over time.Implications for RehabilitationTherapists’ learning and support needs in integrating virtual reality extend beyond technical proficiency to include clinical decision-making and application competencies spanning the entire rehabilitation process.Phased, multi-faceted strategies may be valuable in addressing therapists’ changing needs as they progress from novice to experienced virtual reality users.The ADOPT-VR is a sensitive measure to re-evaluate the personal, social, environmental, technology-specific and system-level factors influencing virtual reality adoption over time. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Taylor & Francis

Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge translation

Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge translation

Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology , Volume 12 (3): 10 – Apr 3, 2017

Abstract

AbstractPurpose: To evaluate the impact of knowledge translation (KT) on factors influencing virtual reality (VR) adoption and to identify support needs of therapists. Hypotheses: Intervention will be associated with improvements in therapists' perceived ease of use and self-efficacy, and an associated increase in intentions to use VR. Method: Single group mixed-methods pre-test–post-test evaluation of convenience sample of physical, occupational and rehabilitation therapists (n=37) from two brain injury rehabilitation centres. ADOPT-VR administered pre/post KT intervention, consisting of interactive education, clinical manual, technical and clinical support. Results: Increases in perceived ease of use (p=0.000) and self-efficacy (p=0.001), but not behavioural intention to use VR (p=0.158) were found following KT, along with decreases in the frequency of perceived barriers. Post-test changes in the frequency and nature of perceived facilitators and barriers were evident, with increased emphasis on peer influence, organisational-level supports and client factors. Additional support needs were related to clinical reasoning, treatment programme development, technology selection and troubleshooting. Conclusions: KT strategies hold potential for targeting therapists’ perceptions of low self-efficacy and ease of use of this technology. Changes in perceived barriers, facilitators and support needs at post-test demonstrated support for repeated evaluation and multi-phased training initiatives to address therapists’ needs over time.Implications for RehabilitationTherapists’ learning and support needs in integrating virtual reality extend beyond technical proficiency to include clinical decision-making and application competencies spanning the entire rehabilitation process.Phased, multi-faceted strategies may be valuable in addressing therapists’ changing needs as they progress from novice to experienced virtual reality users.The ADOPT-VR is a sensitive measure to re-evaluate the personal, social, environmental, technology-specific and system-level factors influencing virtual reality adoption over time.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/evaluating-change-in-virtual-reality-adoption-for-brain-injury-lqMM0axI5J

References (54)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2015 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
ISSN
1748-3115
eISSN
1748-3107
DOI
10.3109/17483107.2015.1111944
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractPurpose: To evaluate the impact of knowledge translation (KT) on factors influencing virtual reality (VR) adoption and to identify support needs of therapists. Hypotheses: Intervention will be associated with improvements in therapists' perceived ease of use and self-efficacy, and an associated increase in intentions to use VR. Method: Single group mixed-methods pre-test–post-test evaluation of convenience sample of physical, occupational and rehabilitation therapists (n=37) from two brain injury rehabilitation centres. ADOPT-VR administered pre/post KT intervention, consisting of interactive education, clinical manual, technical and clinical support. Results: Increases in perceived ease of use (p=0.000) and self-efficacy (p=0.001), but not behavioural intention to use VR (p=0.158) were found following KT, along with decreases in the frequency of perceived barriers. Post-test changes in the frequency and nature of perceived facilitators and barriers were evident, with increased emphasis on peer influence, organisational-level supports and client factors. Additional support needs were related to clinical reasoning, treatment programme development, technology selection and troubleshooting. Conclusions: KT strategies hold potential for targeting therapists’ perceptions of low self-efficacy and ease of use of this technology. Changes in perceived barriers, facilitators and support needs at post-test demonstrated support for repeated evaluation and multi-phased training initiatives to address therapists’ needs over time.Implications for RehabilitationTherapists’ learning and support needs in integrating virtual reality extend beyond technical proficiency to include clinical decision-making and application competencies spanning the entire rehabilitation process.Phased, multi-faceted strategies may be valuable in addressing therapists’ changing needs as they progress from novice to experienced virtual reality users.The ADOPT-VR is a sensitive measure to re-evaluate the personal, social, environmental, technology-specific and system-level factors influencing virtual reality adoption over time.

Journal

Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive TechnologyTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 3, 2017

Keywords: Brain injury; knowledge translation; rehabilitation; technology adoption; theory of planned behaviour; virtual reality

There are no references for this article.