Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Estimation of missing total number of trials in binomial time series analysis by a BDLM process with an illustration of the COVID-19 pandemic data

Estimation of missing total number of trials in binomial time series analysis by a BDLM process... The criteria used for sample size determination are generally developed based on applying averaging techniques to the possible values a variable can take on. This paper presented new methods for estimation of sample size, in particular for binomial distribution, when an observation on number of successes is available. In this paper, first, the general criteria for the determination of sample size were reviewed. Next, the BDLM process was concisely introduced and fit to the first real-world dataset. Then, based on the model, four new methods for the estimation of the missing total number of trials in binomial time series were developed with the illustrated small dataset, where number of successes at any specific time point was known. In addition, the worst outcome criterion was evaluated based on the highest probability density (HPD) confidence set by using the illustrated data and the results were compared with those of the new methods developed in the present paper. Later, an illustration of COVID-19 trinomial data was presented in which BDLM was fit to the time series of cured cases infected due to COVID-19 disease. Finally, the new methods of estimation of missing total confirmed cases evaluated by the relatively large dataset. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biostatistics & Epidemiology Taylor & Francis

Estimation of missing total number of trials in binomial time series analysis by a BDLM process with an illustration of the COVID-19 pandemic data

Nakhkoob, Massoud
Biostatistics & Epidemiology , Volume 6 (1): 23 – Jan 2, 2022
Download PDF

Estimation of missing total number of trials in binomial time series analysis by a BDLM process with an illustration of the COVID-19 pandemic data

Abstract

The criteria used for sample size determination are generally developed based on applying averaging techniques to the possible values a variable can take on. This paper presented new methods for estimation of sample size, in particular for binomial distribution, when an observation on number of successes is available. In this paper, first, the general criteria for the determination of sample size were reviewed. Next, the BDLM process was concisely introduced and fit to the first real-world...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/estimation-of-missing-total-number-of-trials-in-binomial-time-series-ElR63rgLeE
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2021 International Biometric Society – Chinese Region
ISSN
2470-9379
eISSN
2470-9360
DOI
10.1080/24709360.2021.2006397
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The criteria used for sample size determination are generally developed based on applying averaging techniques to the possible values a variable can take on. This paper presented new methods for estimation of sample size, in particular for binomial distribution, when an observation on number of successes is available. In this paper, first, the general criteria for the determination of sample size were reviewed. Next, the BDLM process was concisely introduced and fit to the first real-world dataset. Then, based on the model, four new methods for the estimation of the missing total number of trials in binomial time series were developed with the illustrated small dataset, where number of successes at any specific time point was known. In addition, the worst outcome criterion was evaluated based on the highest probability density (HPD) confidence set by using the illustrated data and the results were compared with those of the new methods developed in the present paper. Later, an illustration of COVID-19 trinomial data was presented in which BDLM was fit to the time series of cured cases infected due to COVID-19 disease. Finally, the new methods of estimation of missing total confirmed cases evaluated by the relatively large dataset.

Journal

Biostatistics & Epidemiology – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jan 2, 2022

Keywords: Sample size determination; binomial dynamic linear model; beta-distribution method; F-distribution method; maximized probability method (MPM)

References

  • Bayesian approaches to the determination of sample sizes for binomial and multinomial sampling – some comments on the paper by Pham-Gia and Turkkan
  • Sample size calculations for binomial proportions via highest posterior density intervals
  • Sample size determination in Bayesian analysis
  • Estimation of Bayesian sample size for binomial proportions using areas P-tolerance with lowest posterior loss
  • Binomial time series analysis by a multiplicative DLM