Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/taylor-francis/empirical-support-for-the-reliability-of-dna-evidence-interpretation-8iS130ZlPH
References (23)
-
R. Chakraborty (2000)
Interpreting DNA evidenceAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 112
-
M. Mulekar (2008)
Weight-of Evidence for Forensic DNA ProfilesTechnometrics, 50
-
S. Walsh, R. Mitchell, N. Watson, John Buckleton (2007)
A comprehensive analysis of microsatellite diversity in Aboriginal AustraliansJournal of Human Genetics, 52
-
J. Curran, J. Buckleton, C. Triggs (2003)
What is the magnitude of the subpopulation effect?Forensic science international, 135 1
-
(2005)
R v Bropho: the need for careful interpretation of independence testing in courtroom decision-making -
D. Balding, R. Nichols (1994)
DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands.Forensic science international, 64 2-3
-
R. Lewontin, D. Hartl (1991)
Population genetics in forensic DNA typing.Science, 254 5039
-
S. Walsh, R. Mitchell, F. Torpy, J. Buckleton (2007)
Use of subpopulation data in Australian forensic DNA casework.Forensic science international. Genetics, 1 3-4
-
Deborah Kellie (2001)
Justice in the Age of Technology DNA and the Criminal TrialAlternative Law Journal, 26
-
C. Castro, L. Silbert, B. McNaughton, C. Barnes (1989)
Recovery of spatial learning deficits after decay of electrically induced synaptic enhancement in the hippocampusNature, 342
-
B. Weir (2004)
Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles.Journal of forensic sciences, 49 5
-
R. Chakraborty, K. Kidd (1991)
The utility of DNA typing in forensic work.Science, 254 5039
-
A. Anderson (1989)
DNA fingerprinting on trialNature, 342
-
(1990)
50 A Crim R 233 -
Michael Briody (2002)
The Effects of DNA Evidence on Sexual Offence Cases in CourtCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice, 14
-
Deborah Kellie, G. Turbett (2001)
Collection of two articles on DNA profiling and criminal trialsAlternative Law Journal, 26
-
(2004)
Matching and partially matching profiles -
J. Curran, S. Walsh, J. Buckleton (2007)
Empirical testing of estimated DNA frequencies.Forensic science international. Genetics, 1 3-4
-
J. Buckleton, C. Triggs, S. Walsh (2004)
Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation, 500
-
D. Whiley, B. Hocking (2003)
DNA: Crime, Law and Public Policy -
B. Am (2005)
Difficulties in Deriving Conclusions from DNA Data for Australian AboriginesAustralian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 37
-
P. Giannelli (2001)
Impact of Post-Conviction DNA Testing in Forensic Science -
(2002)
Protection of Human Genetic Information (Discussion Paper 66)
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Copyright
- Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
- ISSN
- 1834-562X
- eISSN
- 0045-0618
- DOI
- 10.1080/00450610802172230
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The results of empirical testing of forensic DNA probabilities for Australian and New Zealand populations is reported. It is concluded that if consideration is given to relatedness and subpopulation effects, the current model used in most of Australia and New Zealand appears to give very good predictions.
Journal
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences – Taylor & Francis
Published: Dec 1, 2008
Keywords: DNA interpretation; Australia; New Zealand; Aboriginal; Polynesian