Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Editorial

Editorial Over the last six years there has been a general movement towards the refine- ment of adoption law and procedure. This has culminated in agreement between States on a number of fundamental matters such as reciprocal recognition of adoption orders. Some States have also made major changes in their legislation. The negotiations (initiated by Sir Garfield Barwick, then Federal Attorney- General) between the States and also between community groups and their respective States seemed at the time very protracted. In New South Wales, for instance, more than six years have elapsed since the first discussion between States and the implementation of regulations under the new act. There have, however, been some gains in this extended period for a number of social workers in the field of adoption and related services. They needed time to increase their knowledge of the great complexity of the field, to define more precisely their professional function in relation to others' and, in the light of this, to present their opinion on the content of proposed law and procedure. That this time should have been necessary represents one aspect of the profession's uneven deployment in areas which are generally considered "natural" to the social worker. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Social Work Taylor & Francis

Editorial

Australian Journal of Social Work , Volume 20 (1): 1 – Feb 1, 1967

Editorial

Australian Journal of Social Work , Volume 20 (1): 1 – Feb 1, 1967

Abstract

Over the last six years there has been a general movement towards the refine- ment of adoption law and procedure. This has culminated in agreement between States on a number of fundamental matters such as reciprocal recognition of adoption orders. Some States have also made major changes in their legislation. The negotiations (initiated by Sir Garfield Barwick, then Federal Attorney- General) between the States and also between community groups and their respective States seemed at the time very protracted. In New South Wales, for instance, more than six years have elapsed since the first discussion between States and the implementation of regulations under the new act. There have, however, been some gains in this extended period for a number of social workers in the field of adoption and related services. They needed time to increase their knowledge of the great complexity of the field, to define more precisely their professional function in relation to others' and, in the light of this, to present their opinion on the content of proposed law and procedure. That this time should have been necessary represents one aspect of the profession's uneven deployment in areas which are generally considered "natural" to the social worker.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/editorial-ZlkYxFb5N8

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
0004-9565
DOI
10.1080/03124076708549640
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Over the last six years there has been a general movement towards the refine- ment of adoption law and procedure. This has culminated in agreement between States on a number of fundamental matters such as reciprocal recognition of adoption orders. Some States have also made major changes in their legislation. The negotiations (initiated by Sir Garfield Barwick, then Federal Attorney- General) between the States and also between community groups and their respective States seemed at the time very protracted. In New South Wales, for instance, more than six years have elapsed since the first discussion between States and the implementation of regulations under the new act. There have, however, been some gains in this extended period for a number of social workers in the field of adoption and related services. They needed time to increase their knowledge of the great complexity of the field, to define more precisely their professional function in relation to others' and, in the light of this, to present their opinion on the content of proposed law and procedure. That this time should have been necessary represents one aspect of the profession's uneven deployment in areas which are generally considered "natural" to the social worker.

Journal

Australian Journal of Social WorkTaylor & Francis

Published: Feb 1, 1967

There are no references for this article.