Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods

Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods The most commonly used method to test an indirect effect is to divide the estimate of the indirect effect by its standard error and compare the resulting z statistic with a critical value from the standard normal distribution. Confidence limits for the indirect effect are also typically based on critical values from the standard normal distribution. This article uses a simulation study to demonstrate that confidence limits are imbalanced because the distribution of the indirect effect is normal only in special cases. Two alternatives for improving the performance of confidence limits for the indirect effect are evaluated: (a) a method based on the distribution of the product of two normal random variables, and (b) resampling methods. In Study 1, confidence limits based on the distribution of the product are more accurate than methods based on an assumed normal distribution but confidence limits are still imbalanced. Study 2 demonstrates that more accurate confidence limits are obtained using resampling methods, with the bias-corrected bootstrap the best method overall. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Multivariate Behavioral Research Taylor & Francis

Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods

30 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/confidence-limits-for-the-indirect-effect-distribution-of-the-product-gBMklNj7GW

References (66)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
1532-7906
eISSN
0027-3171
DOI
10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The most commonly used method to test an indirect effect is to divide the estimate of the indirect effect by its standard error and compare the resulting z statistic with a critical value from the standard normal distribution. Confidence limits for the indirect effect are also typically based on critical values from the standard normal distribution. This article uses a simulation study to demonstrate that confidence limits are imbalanced because the distribution of the indirect effect is normal only in special cases. Two alternatives for improving the performance of confidence limits for the indirect effect are evaluated: (a) a method based on the distribution of the product of two normal random variables, and (b) resampling methods. In Study 1, confidence limits based on the distribution of the product are more accurate than methods based on an assumed normal distribution but confidence limits are still imbalanced. Study 2 demonstrates that more accurate confidence limits are obtained using resampling methods, with the bias-corrected bootstrap the best method overall.

Journal

Multivariate Behavioral ResearchTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 2004

There are no references for this article.