Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Cogito Interruptus The Epistolary Body in the Elisabeth-Descartes Correspondence, June 22, 1645–November 3, 1645 Kyoo Lee Cogito interruptus is typical of those who see the world inhabited by symbols and symptoms. Like someone who, for example, points to the little box of matches, stares hard into your eyes, and says, “You see, there are seven . . . ,” then gives you a meaningful look, waiting for you to perceive the meaning concealed in that unmistakable sign. Cogito interruptus is also typical of those who see the world inhabited not by symbols but by symptoms: indubitable signs of something that is neither here below nor up above, but that sooner or later will happen. . . . Cogito interruptus is not a great prophetic, poetic, psychological technique. Only that it is ineffable. And it takes real faith in cogito interruptus—and a wish that readers understand me—for me to venture to speak of it, no matter what. —Umberto Eco, “Cogito Interruptus,” Travels in Hyperreality Introduction : Back to the Letters Themselv es W hile look ing through the private letters that the philosopher M. René Desca r tes (159 6 –1650) e xc ha nged w it h Pr incess
philoSOPHIA – State University of New York Press
Published: Jun 5, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.