The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) has been widely used in psychological literature as a measure of vigi- lance (the ability to sustain attention over a prolonged period of time). This task uses a Go/No-Go paradigm and requires the participants to repetitively respond to the stimuli as quickly and as accurately as possible. Previous literature indicates that performance in SART is subjected to a “speed–accuracy trade-off” (SATO) resulting from strategy choices and from the failures of controlling motor reflexes. In this study, 36 participants (n = 36) performed a series of four SARTs. The results support the perspective of strategy choice in SART and suggest that within-subjects SATO in SART should also be acknowledged in attempting to explain SART performance. The implications of the speed–accuracy trade-off should be fully understood when the SART is being used as a measure or tool. Keywords Sustained Attention to Response Task · Speed–accuracy trade-off · Within-subject speed–accuracy trade-off (SATO) Introduction nature of target appearance (Manly et al. 1999). There is, however, an ongoing debate regarding whether errors of The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART; Robert- commission, responding to the No-Go stimuli, are indica- son et al. 1997) is a short duration Go-No–Go task in which tive
Experimental Brain Research – Springer Journals
Published: May 30, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud