Loading next page...
/lp/springer_journal/you-are-measuring-the-decision-to-be-fast-not-inattention-the-xOajK0EWHa
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
- Subject
- Biomedicine; Neurosciences; Neurology
- ISSN
- 0014-4819
- eISSN
- 1432-1106
- D.O.I.
- 10.1007/s00221-018-5291-6
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) has been widely used in psychological literature as a measure of vigi- lance (the ability to sustain attention over a prolonged period of time). This task uses a Go/No-Go paradigm and requires the participants to repetitively respond to the stimuli as quickly and as accurately as possible. Previous literature indicates that performance in SART is subjected to a “speed–accuracy trade-off” (SATO) resulting from strategy choices and from the failures of controlling motor reflexes. In this study, 36 participants (n = 36) performed a series of four SARTs. The results support the perspective of strategy choice in SART and suggest that within-subjects SATO in SART should also be acknowledged in attempting to explain SART performance. The implications of the speed–accuracy trade-off should be fully understood when the SART is being used as a measure or tool. Keywords Sustained Attention to Response Task · Speed–accuracy trade-off · Within-subject speed–accuracy trade-off (SATO) Introduction nature of target appearance (Manly et al. 1999). There is, however, an ongoing debate regarding whether errors of The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART; Robert- commission, responding to the No-Go stimuli, are indica- son et al. 1997) is a short duration Go-No–Go task in which tive
Journal
Experimental Brain Research – Springer Journals
Published: May 30, 2018
@Phil_Robichaud
@deepthiw
@JoseServera