Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Iain Skinner, P. Mort, R. Calvo, Helen Drury, Marco Molina (2012)
Some do, some don't: student use of online writing resources
D. Kenwright, Emma Osborne, Wei Dai, R. Grainger (2016)
Drivers of openness to online and flipped learning in medical educationMedEdPublish, 5
P. Burnard, Paul Gill, K. Stewart, E. Treasure, B. Chadwick (2008)
Analysing and presenting qualitative dataBDJ, 204
D. Kenwright, Wei Dai, Emma Osborne, Tehmina Gladman, P. Gallagher, R. Grainger (2017)
Just tell me what I need to know to pass the exam! Can active flipped learning overcome passivity?, 2
A. Tang, Nick Wong, T. Wong (2015)
Learning experience of Chinese nursing students in an online clinical English course: qualitative study.Nurse education today, 35 2
K. Könings, T. Seidel, S. Brand‐Gruwel, J. Merriënboer (2013)
Differences between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of education: profiles to describe congruence and frictionInstructional Science, 42
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke
Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology
D. Kenwright, Jordan Felderhof, J. Wood, Amanda Charlton, M. Nga, Anya Dai (2017)
Cost-Effective Generation of 360° Rotational Pathology SpecimensMedical Science Educator, 27
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen (1977)
Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and ResearchContemporary Sociology, 6
V Braun, V Clarke (2006)
Using thematic analysis in psychologyQual Res Psychol, 3
J. Boruff, D. Storie (2014)
Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 102 1
Isabel Hwang, Michael Tam, S. Lam, P. Lam (2012)
Review of Use of Animation as a Supplementary Learning Material of Physiology Content in Four Academic Years.Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10
Introduction Online materials are replacing traditional pathology museums and microscopes. The interactivity of these ranges from static pictures to virtual slides. In this study, we examined how students chose to interact with magnifiable, rotating, macroscopic specimens versus static pictures. The study focuses on motivation to interact with the extended online resource when it was supple- mentary to, but not required to, answer questions in an online assignment. Methods Students in a fourth-year anatomic pathology course (N = 102) completed online clinical-case-based learning activities. Students’ interaction with online rotatable specimens and the underlying reasons were investigated using a self-developed online post-course survey. Results The 360° rotatable specimens were viewed by 81% of students. Coding of responses to open-end questions identified two short-term motivators (more information and relevant to the question) and two long-term motivators (a better understanding of pathology and helpful for examinations) for viewing dynamic specimen representations. Students reported two reasons for not viewing every online specimen: They could complete activities using the static images, and long loading times for pathology museum pages. Conclusions Students who interacted with relevant online specimens were motivated by both the short-term and long-term expectancy value. The research has implications for designing other online
Medical Science Educator – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 22, 2018
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.