Int Urogynecol J (2017) 28:1271–1274 DOI 10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1 EDITORIAL 1 1 Gunnar Lose & Niels Klarskov Received: 23 May 2017 /Accepted: 23 May 2017 /Published online: 13 July 2017 The International Urogynecological Association 2017 As much as 90% of the published medical information is 1975 , but such articles still make up less than 1‰ of the flawed according to John Ioannidis, one of the true experts huge number of papers published annually in scholarly on credibility of medical research , and former BMJ editor- journals . Of retracted scientific publications, a major pro- in-chief, Richard Smith, has claimed that Bmost of what is portion are retracted because of misconduct and another major published in journals is just plain wrong or nonsense.^ The proportion because of unintentional errors or untrustworthy poor quality of medical research is not a new criticism ; data/interpretation . The Lancet recently questioned the however, concern has been expressed within a broad field of credibility of medical research, especially research from specialties in parallel with reports that studies are fraught with China, because of many retractions . problems including poor reproducibility . A remarkable study reported in Nature in 2005 indicated Publishing research is complex. It
International Urogynecology Journal – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 13, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera