Why do firms rarely adopt IFRS voluntarily? Academics find significant benefits and the costs appear to be low

Why do firms rarely adopt IFRS voluntarily? Academics find significant benefits and the costs... Kim and Shi (Rev Account Stud, doi: 10.1007/s11142-012-9190-y , this issue) document that voluntary IFRS adoption is associated with significant benefits and argue that the effect is causal—a conclusion that is similar to many published papers on IFRS adoption. Yet voluntary IFRS adopters constitute only a small percentage of the global population of firms, which implies that either practitioners behave irrationally or the benefits are incorrectly estimated by academics. In this discussion I argue that the error is on the part of academics, not practitioners, and that it is mainly due to the lack of exogenous variation in accounting standards. This conclusion is based on inconsistencies between the estimated benefits and costs of IFRS adoption, as well as the accounting standards choices of presumed rational managers. I also propose a contracting explanation for the capital market benefits around IFRS adoption in which managers behave rationally, but IFRS per se is not the cause. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Review of Accounting Studies Springer Journals

Why do firms rarely adopt IFRS voluntarily? Academics find significant benefits and the costs appear to be low

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/why-do-firms-rarely-adopt-ifrs-voluntarily-academics-find-significant-If1NsPNXHK
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Business and Management; Accounting/Auditing; Corporate Finance; Public Finance
ISSN
1380-6653
eISSN
1573-7136
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11142-012-9202-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Kim and Shi (Rev Account Stud, doi: 10.1007/s11142-012-9190-y , this issue) document that voluntary IFRS adoption is associated with significant benefits and argue that the effect is causal—a conclusion that is similar to many published papers on IFRS adoption. Yet voluntary IFRS adopters constitute only a small percentage of the global population of firms, which implies that either practitioners behave irrationally or the benefits are incorrectly estimated by academics. In this discussion I argue that the error is on the part of academics, not practitioners, and that it is mainly due to the lack of exogenous variation in accounting standards. This conclusion is based on inconsistencies between the estimated benefits and costs of IFRS adoption, as well as the accounting standards choices of presumed rational managers. I also propose a contracting explanation for the capital market benefits around IFRS adoption in which managers behave rationally, but IFRS per se is not the cause.

Journal

Review of Accounting StudiesSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 6, 2012

References

  • Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries
    Ball, R; Robin, A; Wu, J
  • Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences
    Daske, H; Hail, L; Leuz, C; Verdi, R

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off