Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Brewer, J. Stonecash (2006)
Split: Class and Cultural Divides in American Politics
(2006)
Sample matching: Representative sampling from internet panels
(2008)
Guide to the 2006 cooperative congressional election survey
J. Stonecash (2018)
Class and Party in American Politics
K. Walsh (2009)
Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Doby Andrew GelmanPolitical Science Quarterly, 124
A. Gelman, Boris Shor, Joseph Bafumi, David Park (2005)
Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What's the Matter with Connecticut?
S. Bennett (2002)
Predicting Americans’ Exposure to Political Talk Radio in 1996, 1998, and 2000The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7
(1990)
Class dismissed!QRC advisor, 6 9
(2006)
Cooperative congressional election study—common content
G. Nunberg (2006)
Talking Right: How Conservatives Turned Liberalism into a Tax-Raising, Latte-Drinking, Sushi-Eating, Volvo-Driving, New York Times-Reading, Body-Piercing, Hollywood-Loving, Left-Wing Freak Show
R. Morris (2006)
The Right Talk: How Conservatives Transformed the Great Society into the Economic SocietyArgumentation and Advocacy, 43
S. Ansolabehere, Jonathan Rodden, J. Snyder (2005)
Purple America
E. Carmines, J. Stimson (1989)
Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics
SP Nicholson, GM Segura (2006)
Cooperative congressional election study—UC Merced and University of Washington module
Thomas Nelson, Zoe Oxley, Rosalee Clawson (1997)
Toward a Psychology of Framing EffectsPolitical Behavior, 19
(1974)
Heuristics and Biases
T. Frank (2004)
What's the Matter with Kansas?
N. McCarty, K. Poole, H. Rosenthal (2006)
Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches
R. Pollin (2010)
Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded AgeJournal of Economic Literature, 48
(2001)
One nation, slightly divisible
J. Stonecash (2005)
Scaring the Democrats: What's the Matter with Thomas Frank's Argument?The Forum, 3
Joe Bageant (2007)
Deer Hunting with Jesus: Dispatches from America's Class War
(2004)
Kerry on hunting photo-op to help image
A Tversky, D Kahneman (1974)
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biasesScience, 185
J. Druckman (2001)
The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen CompetencePolitical Behavior, 23
(2008)
For bush, happy trails to crawford
M. Brewer (2008)
Party Images in the American Electorate
M. Hinrichsen (2009)
Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes electionsActa Politica, 44
J. Noland (2010)
What’s the Matter with What’s the Matter with Kansas?
A. Campbell, P. Converse, Warren Miller, Donald Stokes (1960)
The American voterAmerican Journal of Psychology, 74
T Frank (2004)
What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America
J. Geer (1991)
THE ELECTORATE'S PARTISAN EVALUATIONS: EVIDENCE OF A CONTINUING DEMOCRATIC EDGEPublic Opinion Quarterly, 55
(2002)
Rush to judgment: Talk radio and American political behavior
S. Bowler, Stephen Nicholson, Gary Segura (2006)
Earthquakes and Aftershocks: Race, Direct Democracy, and Partisan ChangeAmerican Journal of Political Science, 50
D. Baumer, H. Gold (1995)
Party Images and the American ElectorateAmerican Politics Research, 23
R Inglehart (1977)
The silent revolution
(2005)
Down on the ranch, president wages war on the underbrush
E. Heit, Stephen Nicholson (2010)
The Opposite of Republican: Polarization and Political CategorizationCognitive science, 34 8
R. Jackman (1986)
Elections and the Democratic Class StruggleWorld Politics, 39
A. Gelman, C. Cai (2008)
Should the democrats move to the left on economic policyarXiv: Applications
D. Green, Bradley Palmquist, E. Schickler (2002)
Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters
A Gelman (2008)
Red state, blue state, rich state, poor state
D. Barker (2005)
Values, Frames, and Persuasion in Presidential Nomination CampaignsPolitical Behavior, 27
Some observers of American politics have argued that Republicans have redrawn the social class basis of the parties by displacing the Democrats as the party of the common person. While others have addressed the argument by implication, we address the phenomenon itself. That is, we examine whether the populist rhetoric used by conservatives has reshaped the American public’s perceptions about the social class basis of American political parties. To this end, we used NES data and created novel survey questions for examining the class-based images of the parties. We examine whether the public holds populist images of the Republican Party and whether the working class and evangelical Christians are especially likely to hold this belief. Contrary to this argument, most Americans view the Democrats as the party of the people. Furthermore, working class and evangelical Christians are no less likely to hold this belief.
Political Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 3, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.