Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Gaunt (2012)
“Blessed Is He Who Has Not Made Me a Woman”: Ambivalent Sexism and Jewish ReligiositySex Roles, 67
JF Nash (1950)
The bargaining problemEconometrica, 18
P. Glick, M. Lameiras, Y. Castro (2002)
Education and Catholic Religiosity as Predictors of Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Toward Women and MenSex Roles, 47
Lauren Maltby, M. Hall, Tamara Anderson, K. Edwards (2010)
Religion and Sexism: The Moderating Role of Participant GenderSex Roles, 62
Kevin Cokley, Kimberly Tran, Brittany Hall-Clark, Collette Chapman, Luana Bessa, Angela Finley, Miguel Martínez (2010)
Predicting student attitudes about racial diversity and gender equityJournal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3
(2011)
Seeing the unseen attention to daily encounters with sexism as a way to reduce sexist beliefs
(2011)
Amazon's mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on
C. Sibley, Marc Wilson, J. Duckitt (2007)
Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: The Dual Roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing AuthoritarianismPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33
J. Bosson, J. Vandello, Kenneth Michniewicz, Joshua Lenes (2012)
American Men’s and Women’s Beliefs about Gender Discrimination: For Men, It’s Not Quite a Zero-Sum GameMasculinities & Social Change
(2010)
The relationship between religiosity and ambivalent sexism among Turkish students
C DeNavas-Walt, BD Proctor, JC Smith (2011)
Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2011 (U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60–226)
T. Little, W. Cunningham, G. Shahar, K. Widaman (2002)
To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the MeritsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9
A. Kehn, Joelle Ruthig (2013)
Perceptions of Gender Discrimination across Six Decades: The Moderating Roles of Gender and AgeSex Roles, 69
MJ Zawadzki, SA Shields, CL Danube, JK Swim (2014)
Reducing the endorsement of sexism using experiential learning: The workshop activity for gender equity simulation (WAGES)Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38
Kathryn Bettencourt, T. Vacha-haase, Zinta Byrne (2011)
Older and Younger Adults’ Attitudes Toward Feminism: The Influence of Religiosity, Political Orientation, Gender, Education, and FamilySex Roles, 64
Benjamin Engel (2016)
Social Dominance An Intergroup Theory Of Social Hierarchy And Oppression
James Schreiber, Amaury Nora, Frances Stage, Elizabeth Barlow, J. King (2006)
Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A ReviewThe Journal of Educational Research, 99
FD Blau, LM Kahn (2007)
The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can?Academy of Management Perspectives, 21
J. Swim, K. Aikin, Wayne Hall, B. Hunter (1995)
Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68
Kristof Dhont, Alain Hiel, M. Hewstone (2014)
Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientationGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17
J. Becker (2010)
Why Do Women Endorse Hostile and Benevolent Sexism? The Role of Salient Female Subtypes and Internalization of Sexist ContentsSex Roles, 62
C. Kilmartin, T. Smith, A. Green, Harriotte Heinzen, Michael Kuchler, D. Kolar (2008)
A Real Time Social Norms Intervention to Reduce Male SexismSex Roles, 59
Arne Roets, Alain Hiel, Kristof Dhont (2012)
Is Sexism a Gender Issue? A Motivated Social Cognition Perspective on Men's and Women's Sexist Attitudes toward Own and Other GenderEuropean Journal of Personality, 26
M Buhrmester, T Kwang, SD Gosling (2011)
Amazon's mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6
Carmen DeNavas-Walt, Bernadette Proctor, C. Lee (2006)
Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2005
F. Tougas, Rupert Brown, A. Beaton, Stéphane Joly (1995)
Neosexism: Plus Ça Change, Plus C'est PareilPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21
P. Glick, M. Lameiras, S. Fiske, T. Eckes, B. Masser, C. Volpato, A. Manganelli, J. Pek, Li-li Huang, Nuray Sakallı-Uğurlu, Y. Castro, Maria Pereira, T. Willemsen, Annetje Brunner, Iris Six-Materna, R. Wells, P. Glick (2004)
Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 86 5
J. Becker, J. Swim (2012)
Reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs: Differential effects of addressing harm versus pervasiveness of benevolent sexism.Social Psychology, 43
Natalie Shook, P. Hopkins, Jasmine Koech (2016)
The effect of intergroup contact on secondary group attitudes and social dominance orientationGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19
F. Pratto, J. Sidanius, Lisa Stallworth, B. Malle (1994)
Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67
Clara Wilkins, J. Wellman, Laura Babbitt, Negin Toosi, Katherine Schad (2015)
You can win but I can't lose: Bias against high-status groups increases their zero-sum beliefs about discriminationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57
Pam Flaskrud, Kari Dietzler, Ingrid Niehans, J. Jenkins, M. McClellan, David Rivas, A. Cobb, Richard Silva, J. Honikman, R. Grace, Amanda Casarjian, S. Lemon, D. Goldstein, Maria Wilson, Lauren Yurfest (2001)
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
Matthew Zawadzki, S. Shields, C. Danube, J. Swim (2014)
Reducing the Endorsement of Sexism Using Experiential LearningPsychology of Women Quarterly, 38
Believing that reduced discrimination against women directly corresponds to increased discrimination against men, referred to as a zero-sum perspective (ZSP), may inhibit further attempts toward gender equality. Based on a sample of 313 men and women, we developed and tested both a general measure and a domain-specific measure of the ZSP of gender status then examined sociodemographics (age, education, political orientation, religious beliefs, and past experience with discrimination) and social dominance orientation as predictors of the ZSP of shifts in gender status. Hostile and modern sexism were examined as potential mediators of this relationship. Structural equation models were computed to examine predictive paths separately for men and women. Although some similarities were found, results showed important differences in predictive paths for women and men, and supported the expected mediating role of sexism in the relationships between sociodemographic predictors and the ZSP. Findings have implications for targeting intervention efforts to enhance a win-win or non-zero-sum perspective that may facilitate efforts toward reducing gender discrimination.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.