When is a Compositional Effect not a Compositional Effect?

When is a Compositional Effect not a Compositional Effect? The question of compositional effects (that is, the effect of collective properties of a pupil body on the individual members), or Aggregated Group-Level Effects (AGLEs) as the author prefers to call them, has been the subject of considerable controversy. Some authors, e.g. Rutter et al. [Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children. London: Open Books.], Willms [Oxford Review of Education 11(1): 33–41; (1986). American Sociological Review, 51, 224–241.], Bondi [British Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 203-218.], have claimed to find such effects, while on the other hand Mortimore et al. [School Matters: the Junior Years. Wells: Open Books.] and Thomas and Mortimore [Oxford Review of Education 16(2): 137–158.] did not. Others, for example Hauser [1970], have implied that many apparent AGLEs may be spurious, while Gray et al. [Review of Research in Education, 8, 158–193.] have suggested that at least in certain circumstances such apparent effects may arise as a result of inadequate allowance for pre-existing differences. A possible statistical mechanism for this is outlined in the work of Burstein [In R. Dreeben, & J. A. Thomas (Eds.), The Analysis of Educational Productivity. Volume 1: Issues in Microanalysis, Cambridge, MASS: Ballinger, pp. 119–190] on the effect of aggregating the data when a variable is omitted from the model used. This paper suggests another way in which spurious AGLEs can arise. It shows mathematically that even if there are no omitted variables, measurement error in an explanatory variable could give rise to apparent, but spurious, AGLEs, when analysed using a multilevel modelling procedure. Using simulation methods, it investigates what the practical effects of this are likely to be, and shows that statistically significant spurious effects occur systematically under fairly standard conditions. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality & Quantity Springer Journals

When is a Compositional Effect not a Compositional Effect?

Loading next page...
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Copyright © 2007 by Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Social Sciences; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site


You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches


Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.



billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial