Techniques in Coloproctology (2018) 22:401–402 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1799-9 CORRESPONDENCE What is fast track multimodal management of colorectal cancer surgery in real life? 1,2 1 1,2 Bertrand Trilling · PierreY ‑ ves Sage · Jean‑Luc Faucheron Received: 7 April 2018 / Accepted: 6 May 2018 / Published online: 1 June 2018 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 Dear Sir, randomization process”, but it is also mentioned further that there was “infiltration of surgical wounds with Ropivacaine” We read recently an article comparing short-term outcome in the FFT group, which by definition is not blind. of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with a multi- Third, we do not understand why 10% of patients who had modal full fast track (FFT) or limited fast track (LFT) care a colectomy for cancer had a stoma, considering exclusion program . Based on a meta-analysis of the literature, criteria of emergency, obesity, denutrition, unfit patients, the authors hypothesized decreased postoperative morbid- and high-grade tumors. More than 55% of the patients in the ity after the FFT program. According to the results of this entire cohort had a stoma. multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, superiority trial, Fourth, mean operation time was significantly longer in the authors delivered the message that a multimodal
Techniques in Coloproctology – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud