Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration

Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in... Eur Spine J (2018) 27:1219–1233 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5301-6 REVIEW Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low‑risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration 1 2,3 4 1,3 5 N. Moser  · N. Lemeunier  · D. Southerst  · H. Shearer  · K. Murnaghan  · 3 3,6 D. Sutton  · P. Côté   Received: 26 March 2017 / Revised: 22 August 2017 / Accepted: 14 September 2017 / Published online: 22 September 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Results We screened 679 citations; five had a low risk of Purpose To update findings of the 2000–2010 Bone and bias and were included in our synthesis. The sensitivity of Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated the Canadian C-spine rule ranged from 0.90 to 1.00 with Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) on the validity and reli- negative predictive values ranging from 99 to 100%. Inter- ability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical rater reliability of the Canadian C-spine rule varied from spine injury in alert low-risk adult patients with blunt trauma k = 0.60 between nurses and physicians to k = 0.93 among to the neck. paramedics. The inter-rater reliability of the Nexus Low- Methods http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Spine Journal Springer Journals

Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/validity-and-reliability-of-clinical-prediction-rules-used-to-screen-DpiEbboaUz
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Surgical Orthopedics; Neurosurgery
ISSN
0940-6719
eISSN
1432-0932
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00586-017-5301-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur Spine J (2018) 27:1219–1233 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5301-6 REVIEW Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low‑risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration 1 2,3 4 1,3 5 N. Moser  · N. Lemeunier  · D. Southerst  · H. Shearer  · K. Murnaghan  · 3 3,6 D. Sutton  · P. Côté   Received: 26 March 2017 / Revised: 22 August 2017 / Accepted: 14 September 2017 / Published online: 22 September 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Results We screened 679 citations; five had a low risk of Purpose To update findings of the 2000–2010 Bone and bias and were included in our synthesis. The sensitivity of Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated the Canadian C-spine rule ranged from 0.90 to 1.00 with Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) on the validity and reli- negative predictive values ranging from 99 to 100%. Inter- ability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical rater reliability of the Canadian C-spine rule varied from spine injury in alert low-risk adult patients with blunt trauma k = 0.60 between nurses and physicians to k = 0.93 among to the neck. paramedics. The inter-rater reliability of the Nexus Low- Methods

Journal

European Spine JournalSpringer Journals

Published: Sep 22, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off