Synthese https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1820-x S.I.: ABSTRACTION AND IDEALIZATION IN SCIENTIFIC MODELLING Using models to correct data: paleodiversity and the fossil record Alisa Bokulich Received: 14 August 2017 / Accepted: 17 May 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Despite an enormous philosophical literature on models in science, surpris- ingly little has been written about data models and how they are constructed. In this paper, I examine the case of how paleodiversity data models are constructed from the fossil data. In particular, I show how paleontologists are using various model-based techniques to correct the data. Drawing on this research, I argue for the following related theses: ﬁrst, the ‘purity’ of a data model is not a measure of its epistemic reliability. Instead it is the ﬁdelity of the data that matters. Second, the ﬁdelity of a data model in capturing the signal of interest is a matter of degree. Third, the ﬁdelity of a data model can be improved ‘vicariously’, such as through the use of post hoc model-based correction techniques. And, fourth, data models, like theoretical models, should be assessed as adequate (or inadequate) for particular purposes. Keywords Paleontology · Paleobiology · Evolution · Data ·
Synthese – Springer Journals
Published: May 29, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud