Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Using models to correct data: paleodiversity and the fossil record

Using models to correct data: paleodiversity and the fossil record Synthese https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1820-x S.I.: ABSTRACTION AND IDEALIZATION IN SCIENTIFIC MODELLING Using models to correct data: paleodiversity and the fossil record Alisa Bokulich Received: 14 August 2017 / Accepted: 17 May 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Despite an enormous philosophical literature on models in science, surpris- ingly little has been written about data models and how they are constructed. In this paper, I examine the case of how paleodiversity data models are constructed from the fossil data. In particular, I show how paleontologists are using various model-based techniques to correct the data. Drawing on this research, I argue for the following related theses: first, the ‘purity’ of a data model is not a measure of its epistemic reliability. Instead it is the fidelity of the data that matters. Second, the fidelity of a data model in capturing the signal of interest is a matter of degree. Third, the fidelity of a data model can be improved ‘vicariously’, such as through the use of post hoc model-based correction techniques. And, fourth, data models, like theoretical models, should be assessed as adequate (or inadequate) for particular purposes. Keywords Paleontology · Paleobiology · Evolution · Data · http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Synthese Springer Journals

Using models to correct data: paleodiversity and the fossil record

Bokulich, Alisa
Synthese , Volume OnlineFirst – May 29, 2018
Download PDF
22 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/using-models-to-correct-data-paleodiversity-and-the-fossil-record-60jh1W50zv
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
Subject
Philosophy; Philosophy of Science; Epistemology; Logic; Philosophy of Language; Metaphysics
ISSN
0039-7857
eISSN
1573-0964
DOI
10.1007/s11229-018-1820-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Synthese https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1820-x S.I.: ABSTRACTION AND IDEALIZATION IN SCIENTIFIC MODELLING Using models to correct data: paleodiversity and the fossil record Alisa Bokulich Received: 14 August 2017 / Accepted: 17 May 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Despite an enormous philosophical literature on models in science, surpris- ingly little has been written about data models and how they are constructed. In this paper, I examine the case of how paleodiversity data models are constructed from the fossil data. In particular, I show how paleontologists are using various model-based techniques to correct the data. Drawing on this research, I argue for the following related theses: first, the ‘purity’ of a data model is not a measure of its epistemic reliability. Instead it is the fidelity of the data that matters. Second, the fidelity of a data model in capturing the signal of interest is a matter of degree. Third, the fidelity of a data model can be improved ‘vicariously’, such as through the use of post hoc model-based correction techniques. And, fourth, data models, like theoretical models, should be assessed as adequate (or inadequate) for particular purposes. Keywords Paleontology · Paleobiology · Evolution · Data ·

Journal

Synthese – Springer Journals

Published: May 29, 2018

References

  • Geographical, environmental, and intrinsic biotic controls on phanerozoic marine diversification
    Alroy, J
  • Quantitative methods in paleobiology
    Alroy, J
  • Comparing the geological and fossil records: Implications for biodiversity studies
    Benton, M; Dunhill, A; Lloyd, G; Marx, F
  • Introduction to paleobiology and the fossil record
    Benton, M; Harper, D
  • A simulation-based examination of residual diversity estimates as a method of correcting for sampling bias
    Brocklehurst, N
  • Rarefaction and nonrandom spatial dispersion patterns
    Collins, M; Simberloff, D
  • Rock, bone, and ruin: An optimist’s guide to the historical sciences
    Currie, A
  • Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance
    Edwards, P
  • A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming
    Edwards, P
  • Models in paleobiology
    Eldredge, N; Gould, SJ
  • Elvis taxa
    Erwin, D; Droser, M
  • Perspective: Evolutionary patterns in the fossil record
    Foote, M
  • The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters
    Good, IJ
  • The shape of evolution: A comparison of real and random clades
    Gould, SJ; Raup, D; Sepkoski, J; Schopf, T; Simberloff, D
  • The paleobiological revolution: Essays on the growth of modern paleontology
    Huss, J
  • Estimating paleodiversities: A test of taxic and phylogenetic methods
    Lane, A; Janis, C; Sepkoski, J
  • Data-centric biology: A philosophical study
    Leonelli, S
  • Springer handbook of model-based science
  • Current perspectives on the permian-triassic boundary and end-permian mass extinction: Preface
    Metcalfe, I; Isozaki, Y
  • Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance
    Norton, S; Suppe, F
  • Tree-based approaches to understanding history: Comments on ranks, rules, and the quality of the fossil record
    Norwell, M
  • Scientific models and adequacy for purpose
    Parker, W
  • Taxonomic diversity during the phanerozoic
    Raup, D
  • Taxanomic diversity estimation using rarefaction
    Raup, D
  • Dinosaurs in decline tens of millions of years before their final extinction
    Sakamoto, M; Benton, M; Venditti, C
  • ‘Residual diversity estimates’ do not correct for sampling bias in palaeodiversity data
    Sakamoto, M; Venditti, C; Benton, M
  • Compendium of fossil marine families
    Sepkoski, J
  • A kinetic model of phanerozoic taxanomic diversity. III. Post-paleozoic families and mass extinctions
    Sepkoski, J
  • Mass-extinction debates: How science works in a crisis
    Sepkoski, J
  • Reading the fossil record: The growth of paleobiology as an evolutionary discipline
    Sepkoski, D
  • ‘Replying life’s tape’: Simulations, metaphors, and historicity in Stephen Jay Gould’s view of life
    Sepkoski, D
  • ‘Towards a natural history of data’: Evolving practices and epistemologies of data in paleontology, 1800–2000
    Sepkoski, D
  • ‘Replaying life’s tape’: Simulations, metaphors, and historicity in Stephen Jay Gould’s view of life
    Sepkoski, D
  • The paleobiological revolution: Essays on the growth of modern paleontology
    Sepkoski, D; Ruse, M
  • Geological implications of large asteroids and comets on the earth
    Signor, P; Lipps, J
  • Systematics and the fossil record: Documenting evolutionary patterns
    Smith, A
  • The shape of the phanerozoic marine paleodiversity curve: How much can be predicted from the sedimentary rock record of Western Europe
    Smith, A; McGowan, A
  • Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: Proceedings of the 1960 international congress
    Suppes, P
  • Making prehistory: Historical science and the scientific realism debate. Cambridge studies in philosophy and biology
    Turner, D
  • Paleontology: A philosophical introduction
    Turner, D
  • The sauropods: Evolution and paleobiology
    Upchurch, P; Barrett, P
  • Scientific representation: Paradoxes of perspective
    Fraassen, B

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial