USE OF NATIONWIDE OUTCOMES MONITORING DATA TO COMPARE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN SPECIALIZED MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS AND GENERAL PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS IN THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

USE OF NATIONWIDE OUTCOMES MONITORING DATA TO COMPARE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN SPECIALIZED MENTAL... There has been a growing interest in the implementation of evidence-based specialized mental health programs. However, there has been little study of the effectiveness of these programs in comparison with standard mental health care in real world mental health systems. This study used a national sample of patients from the Veterans Health Administration to compare changes in mental health status in various specialized mental health outpatient programs and in general psychiatric clinics. Hierarchical linear models were used to compare the association of both regularity and intensity of care in six specialized mental health programs with GAF change scores in patients treated in general psychiatric clinics. While improvements were observed in all programs, two specialized programs performed better overall than general psychiatric care, one was not significantly different, and three had poorer outcomes than general psychiatric clinics. Programmatic differences in target populations accompanied by imperfect risk adjustment for population differences most likely explain why these results differ from those observed in clinical trials. While the analytic strategies demonstrated here may have wider applicability to comparative performance assessment, this study provides a cautionary tale concerning the limits of conclusions that can be drawn from large scale outcomes monitoring efforts. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychiatric Quarterly Springer Journals

USE OF NATIONWIDE OUTCOMES MONITORING DATA TO COMPARE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN SPECIALIZED MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS AND GENERAL PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS IN THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/use-of-nationwide-outcomes-monitoring-data-to-compare-clinical-QCvwKGwlQ6
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Psychiatry; Public Health; Sociology, general
ISSN
0033-2720
eISSN
1573-6709
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11126-006-9004-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in the implementation of evidence-based specialized mental health programs. However, there has been little study of the effectiveness of these programs in comparison with standard mental health care in real world mental health systems. This study used a national sample of patients from the Veterans Health Administration to compare changes in mental health status in various specialized mental health outpatient programs and in general psychiatric clinics. Hierarchical linear models were used to compare the association of both regularity and intensity of care in six specialized mental health programs with GAF change scores in patients treated in general psychiatric clinics. While improvements were observed in all programs, two specialized programs performed better overall than general psychiatric care, one was not significantly different, and three had poorer outcomes than general psychiatric clinics. Programmatic differences in target populations accompanied by imperfect risk adjustment for population differences most likely explain why these results differ from those observed in clinical trials. While the analytic strategies demonstrated here may have wider applicability to comparative performance assessment, this study provides a cautionary tale concerning the limits of conclusions that can be drawn from large scale outcomes monitoring efforts.

Journal

Psychiatric QuarterlySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 9, 2006

References

  • Interrater reliability issues in multicenter trials, Part 1: Theoretical concepts and operational procedures used in Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study #394
    Tracy, K; Adler, LA; Rotrosen, J

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off