In 1930, von Kármán presented an expression for the mean velocity distribution in channel and pipe flows that can be transformed into the today well-known logarithmic velocity distribution. At the same time, he also formulated the logarithmic skin friction law and obtained a value of 0.38 for the constant named after him through pipe flow pressure drop measurements. Different approaches to determine the von Kármán constant from mean velocity measurements have been proposed over the last decades, sometimes giving different results even when employed on the same data, partly because the range over which the logarithmic law should be fitted is also under debate. Up to today, the research community has not been able to converge toward a single value and the favored values range between 0.36 and 0.44 for different research groups and canonical flow cases. The present paper discusses some pitfalls and error sources of commonly employed estimation methods and shows, through the use of boundary layer data from Österlund (1999) that von Kármán’s original suggestion of 0.38 seems still to be valid for zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer flows. More importantly, it is shown that the uncertainty in the determination of the von Kármán constant can never be less than the uncertainty in the friction velocity, thereby yielding a realistic uncertainty for the most debated constant in wall turbulence.
Experiments in Fluids – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 1, 2013
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera