Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Fox, P. Tracy (1980)
The Randomized Response ApproachEvaluation Review, 4
G. Gils, P. Heijden, J. Landsheer (1996)
Rapportage van uitkeringsfraude in surveys
(1988)
A bibliography on randomized response: 1965–1987
S. Warner (1965)
Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60 309
U.N. Umesh, R.A. Peterson (1991)
A critical evaluation of the randomized response method: applications, validation and research agendaSociological Methods and Research, 20
M. Goodstadt, V. Gruson (1975)
The Randomized Response Technique: A Test on Drug UseJournal of the American Statistical Association, 70
A. Kuk (1990)
Asking sensitive questions indirectlyBiometrika, 77
S. Himmelfarb, C. Lickteig (1982)
Social desirability and the randomized response technique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43
K. Soeken, G. Macready (1982)
Respondents' perceived protection when using randomized response.Psychological Bulletin, 92
U. Umesh, R. Peterson (1991)
A Critical Evaluation of the Randomized Response MethodSociological Methods & Research, 20
S. Edgell, S. Himmelfarb, Karen Duchan (1982)
Validity of Forced Responses in a Randomized Response ModelSociological Methods & Research, 11
P. Heijden, G. Gils, Jan Bouts, J. Hox (1998)
A comparison of randomized response, CASAO, and direct questioning; eliciting sensitive information in the context of social security fraud, 19
P. Heijden, G. Gils (1996)
Some logistic regression models for randomized response data
This study examines two different Randomized Response methods to see whether they evoke sufficient understanding and trust, and ensure fewer evasive answers to socially sensitive questions. Two Randomized Response methods were employed by trained interviewers to study fraud: the Forced Response method, using dice, and Kuk's method, using playing cards. Respondents were selected from the files of the social security offices of three Dutch cities. A total of 334 respondents participated voluntarily in this study of two Randomized Response methods. Most respondents were known to have committed some form of fraud, and their answer on the Randomized Response question is validated with this information. The results indicate that subjects who have a better understanding of the Forced Response technique give more socially undesirable answers. The interviewer has a most important role establishing trust and understanding. Respondents who are less able to understand the instructions, e.g., have limited language abilities, develop less trust in the method.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 19, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.