Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Vahid (2011)
Skepticism and Varieties of Transcendental ArgumentLogos and Episteme, 2
M. Hoffmann (2011)
"Theoric Transformations" and a New Classification of Abductive InferencesTransactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 46
B. Stroud (2002)
The Goal of Transcendental Arguments
D. Boersema (1985)
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural ScienceTeaching Philosophy, 8
(1976)
I-IV). The Hague-Paris/ Atlantic Highlands
Barry Stroud (2002)
Understanding Human Knowledge
A. Burks (2007)
The new elements of mathematics , by Charles S . Peirce , Carolyn Eisele
Stephen Clarke (2010)
Transcendental realisms in the philosophy of science: on Bhaskar and CartwrightSynthese, 173
MHG Hoffmann (2005)
Activity and Sign – Grounding Mathematics Education
M. Friedman (2012)
Reconsidering the dynamics of reason: Response to Ferrari, Mormann, Nordmann, and UebelStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43
J. Hintikka (1980)
C. S. Peirce's “First Real Discovery” and Its Contemporary RelevanceThe Monist, 63
(1968)
Wissenschaft als symbolische Konstruktion des Menschen (1949)
H. Lorentz, A. Einstein (2015)
The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity
Alessandro Cesaris (2011)
Aristotle on non-contradiction
C. Wright (1985)
Representing and InterveningPhilosophical Books, 26
R. Rorty (1971)
Verificationism and transcendental argumentsNoûs, 5
F. Waal (2016)
Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are
(1933)
Theory of electrons and positrons
(2010)
Let me briefly indicate why I do not find this standpoint natural
H. Dosch, V. Müller, Norman Sieroka (2009)
Symbolic Constructions in Quantum Field Theory, 74
N. Huggett (1999)
Space from Zeno to Einstein : classic readings with a contemporary commentary
H Weyl (1968)
Gesammelte Abhandlungen
M. Friedman (2001)
Dynamics of reason : the 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University
(1920)
Relativity; the special & the general theory, a popular exposition (Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, allgemeinverständlich, 1917) (R
(1990)
Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification
B Stroud (1999)
Transcendental arguments. Problems and prospects
B Stroud (1968)
Transcendental argumentsJournal of Philosophy, 65
[ ) . Was ist Relativitätstheory ? In ders . ( Ed . ) , Mein Weltbild
H. Lyre (2009)
Structural Realism and Abductive-Transcendental Arguments
T. G. (1933)
Collected Papers of Charles Sanders PeirceNature, 131
M. Hoffmann (1999)
Problems with Peirce's Concept of AbductionFoundations of Science, 4
(1999)
On Kant’s response to Hume: The second analogy as transcendental argument
(1922)
Geometry and experience (G
J. Everett (2012)
Constituting objectivity: Transcendental perspectives on modern physicsStudies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43
(2015)
Metaphilosophical naturalism and naturalized transcendentalism: Some objections to Kaidesoja’s critique of transcendental arguments in critical realism
C. Joad
Aristotle's Metaphysics.Nature, 116
Michael Smithurst (1987)
Scepticism and Naturalism: Some VarietiesPhilosophical Books, 28
(1952)
Cosmological considerations on the general theory of relativity (1917)
(2013)
The problem of critical ontology: Bhaskar contra Kant
(1970)
Categorial frameworks
I. Kant, G. Hatfield (2004)
Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science : with selections from the Critique of pure reason
B. Stroud (1994)
Kantian Argument, Conceptual Capacities, and Invulnerability
D Howard (2010)
Discourse on a new method: Reinvigorating the marriage of history and philosophy of science
Yuri Balashov (2009)
A Cognizable Universe: Transcendental Arguments in Physical Cosmology
M Bitbol, P Kerszberg, J Petitot (2009)
Introduction Constituting objectivity. Transcendental perspectives on modern physics
M. Hoffmann (2018)
Kant's argument that causality is an a priori principle of cognition (sun warms body)
M. Hoffmann (2005)
Signs as Means for Discoveries
J. Simard (2013)
String theory and the scientific methodDialogue, 54
(1922)
London: Methuen & co. ltd
L. Knutson (2020)
THE THEORY OF RELATIVITYDao De Jing
A. Brueckner (1983)
Transcendental Arguments INoûs, 17
Quassim Cassam (1987)
Transcendental Arguments, Transcendental Synthesis and Transcendental IdealismThe Philosophical Quarterly, 37
David Will (1981)
A realist theory of scienceMedical History, 25
R. Bernstein (1989)
Pragmatism, Pluralism and the Healing of Wounds, 63
Christiane Schmitz-Rigal (2009)
Ernst Cassirer: Open Constitution by Functional A Priori and Symbolical Structuring
P. Manicas, R. Bhaskar (1981)
The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human SciencesCanadian Journal of Sociology-cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 6
M. Friedman, John Dewey, G. Santayana, Bertrand Russell, Ernst Cassirer, Karl Jaspers, Rudolf Carnap, Martin Buber, C. Lewis, K. Popper, Gabriel Marcel, W. Quine
Dynamics of Reason Michael Friedman
B. Sweetman (1997)
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and DemocracyReview of Metaphysics, 51
Although there is increasing interest in philosophy of science in transcendental reasoning, there is hardly any discussion about transcendental arguments. Since this might be related to the dominant understanding of transcendental arguments as a tool to defeat epistemological skepticism, and since the power of transcendental arguments to achieve this goal has convincingly been disputed by Barry Stroud, this contribution proposes, first, a new definition of the transcendental argument which allows its presentation in a simple modus ponens and, second, a pragmatist re-interpretation of this argument form that leaves it to the scientific community to debate, criticize, refine, or reaffirm its core claim: a premise which claims that the truth of a certain assumption is a necessary condition for something that is generally accepted. The proposed “logico-pragmatist interpretation” highlights the role of transcendental arguments as a methodological step to move science forward, just as abduction and inference to the best explanation do.
Erkenntnis – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 6, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.