Tissue marker clip placement after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: methodological issue on validity and reliability

Tissue marker clip placement after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy:... Breast Cancer (2017) 24:730–731 DOI 10.1007/s12282-017-0755-2 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Tissue marker clip placement after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: methodological issue on validity and reliability 1,2 Siamak Sabour Received: 11 December 2016 / Accepted: 5 January 2017 / Published online: 17 January 2017 The Japanese Breast Cancer Society 2017 I was interested to read the paper by Yatake H and col- based approach instead of a group-based one should be leagues published in the November 2016 edition of Breast considered in reproducibility analysis [2–7]. It means the Cancer [1]. The purpose of the authors was to compare difference in the distance between the first and second direct measurement with a conventional method for eval- measurements as well as between two methods may be uation of clip placement in stereotactic vacuum-assisted almost the same with no reproducibility at all and the breast biopsy (ST-VAB) and to evaluate the accuracy of other way around. Global average approach has nothing to clip placement using the direct method [1]. Distances in the do with reproducibility analysis, because it can simply craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views give a misleading message [2–7]. Finally, validity (ac- were measured in 28 subjects with mammograms http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Breast Cancer Springer Journals

Tissue marker clip placement after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: methodological issue on validity and reliability

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/tissue-marker-clip-placement-after-11-gauge-vacuum-assisted-qKt0qsRz4e
Publisher
Springer Japan
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by The Japanese Breast Cancer Society
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Surgical Oncology; Oncology; Surgery; Cancer Research
ISSN
1340-6868
eISSN
1880-4233
D.O.I.
10.1007/s12282-017-0755-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Breast Cancer (2017) 24:730–731 DOI 10.1007/s12282-017-0755-2 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Tissue marker clip placement after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: methodological issue on validity and reliability 1,2 Siamak Sabour Received: 11 December 2016 / Accepted: 5 January 2017 / Published online: 17 January 2017 The Japanese Breast Cancer Society 2017 I was interested to read the paper by Yatake H and col- based approach instead of a group-based one should be leagues published in the November 2016 edition of Breast considered in reproducibility analysis [2–7]. It means the Cancer [1]. The purpose of the authors was to compare difference in the distance between the first and second direct measurement with a conventional method for eval- measurements as well as between two methods may be uation of clip placement in stereotactic vacuum-assisted almost the same with no reproducibility at all and the breast biopsy (ST-VAB) and to evaluate the accuracy of other way around. Global average approach has nothing to clip placement using the direct method [1]. Distances in the do with reproducibility analysis, because it can simply craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views give a misleading message [2–7]. Finally, validity (ac- were measured in 28 subjects with mammograms

Journal

Breast CancerSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 17, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off