Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G Kweon, C Maxton (2013)
Soil organic matter sensing with an on-the-go optical sensorBiosystems Engineering, 115
A Mester, J Kruk, E Zimmermann, H Vereecken (2011)
Quantitative two-layer conductivity inversion of multi-configuration electromagnetic induction measurementsVadose Zone Journal, 10
GW Gee, JW Bauder (1986)
Physical and mineralogical methods
J Taylor, KRJ Smettem, G Pracilio, WH Verboom (2002)
Relationships between soil properties and high-resolution radiometrics, central eastern Wheatbelt, Western AustraliaExploration Geophysics, 33
UWA Vitharana, M Meirvenne, L Cockx, J Bourgeois (2006)
Identifying potential management zones in a layered soil using several sources of ancillary informationSoil Use and Management, 22
KF Smith, PC Flinn (1991)
Monitoring the performance of a broad-based calibration for measuring the nutritive-value of two independent populations of pasture using near-infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopyAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 31
B Borchers, T Uram, JMH Hendrickx (1997)
Tikhonov regularization of electrical conductivity depth profiles in field soilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 61
K Piikki, M Söderström, B Stenberg (2013)
Sensor data fusion for topsoil clay mappingGeoderma, 199
PHGM Hendriks, J Limburg, RJ Meijer (2001)
Full-spectrum analysis of natural gamma-ray spectraJournal of Environmental Radioactivity, 53
H Reese, M Nilsson, P Sandstrom, H Olsson (2002)
Applications using estimates of forest parameters derived from satellite and forest inventory dataComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37
RA Viscarra Rossel, VI Adamchuk, KA Sudduth, NJ McKenzie, C Lobsey (2011)
Proximal soil sensing: An effective approach for soil measurements in space and timeAdvances in Agronomy, 113
M Kodaira, S Shibusawa (2013)
Using a mobile real-time soil visible-near infrared sensor for high resolution soil property mappingGeoderma, 199
J Triantafilis, CH Terhune, FAM Santos (2013)
An inversion approach to generate electromagnetic conductivity images from signal dataEnvironmental Modelling and Software, 43
FA Monteiro Santos, J Triantafilis, KE Bruzgulis, JAE Roe (2010)
Inversion of multiconfiguration electromagnetic (DUALEM-421) profiling data using a one-dimensional laterally constrained algorithmVadose Zone Journal, 9
KA Sudduth, DB Myers, NR Kitchen, ST Drummond (2013)
Modeling soil electrical conductivity-depth relationships with data from proximal and penetrating ECa sensorsGeoderma, 199
J Wetterlind, K Piikki, B Stenberg, M Söderström (2013)
3rd Global Workshop of Proximal Soil Sensing, Potsdam, Germany, 2013
B Kuang, HS Mahmood, M Quraishi, WB Hoogmoed, AM Mouazen, EJ Henten (2012)
Sensing soil properties in the laboratory, in situ and on-line: A reviewAdvances in Agronomy, 114
T Hastie, R Tibshirani, J Friedman (2009)
The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction
DR Legates, GJ McCabe (1999)
Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validationWater Resources Research, 35
The objective of the present study was to evaluate a strategy for three-dimensional (3-D) digital soil mapping on two farms in southwest Sweden. Apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) and gamma radiation data from proximal sensors and laser-scanned elevation data were used as predictors. Depth-integrated ECa measurements from a non-invasive sensor were used directly, but also calibrated against probe sensor ECa measurements to obtain layer-specific values. This allowed the predictive powers of depth-integrated and layer-specific ECa to be compared. Clay and sand fractions, and organic matter content (OM) were modelled for three depth layers by multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARSplines). Clay and sand were consistently better predicted in the topsoil than in the subsoil. MARSplines models based on layer-specific ECa data rather than on depth-integrated ECa data yielded more successful estimations of these soil properties in both subsoil layers (0.4–0.6 and 0.6–0.8 m) on both the farms but this was not always the case in the topsoil. Topsoil OM was better predicted by spatial interpolation of the calibration data than by using MARSplines models with ancillary predictors. In the two subsoil layers, the mapping procedure could not be appropriately tested, because the OM was low and homogeneous. We concluded that a 3-D soil texture map of an agricultural field could be prepared using MARSplines models based on layer-specific ECa values, gamma radiation data and a digital elevation model.
Precision Agriculture – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 7, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.