Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P.W. Holland (1986)
Statistics and causal inference (with discussion)J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 81
W.G. Cochran (1983)
Planning and Analysis of Observational Studies
P.R. Rosenbaum (2002)
Observational Studies
P.R. Rosenbaum, D.B. Rubin (1983)
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 76
P.R. Rosenbaum, D.B. Rubin (1984)
Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity scoreJ. Am. Stat. Assoc., 79
P.W. Holland (1989)
Comment: it’s very clearJ. Am. Stat. Assoc., 84
D.T. Campbell (1969)
Artifact in Behavioral Research
C. Winship, R.D. Mare (1992)
Models for sample selection biasAnnu. Rev. Sociol., 18
R.C. Nichols (1966)
Schools and the disadvantagedScience, 154
L. Wilkinson (1999)
The Task Force on Statistical Inference: Guidelines and explanations: statistical methods in psychology journalsAm. Psychol., 54
D.T. Campbell, A. Erlebacher (1970)
Disadvantaged Child: Compensatory Education, a National Debate, vol. 3
W.R. Shadish, T.D. Cook, D.T. Campbell (2002)
Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference
W.G. Cochran (1965)
The planning of observational studies in human populationsJ. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A-G, 128
J.S. Coleman, E.Q. Campbell, C.J. Hobson, J. McPartland, A.M. Mood, F.D. Weinfeld, R.L. York (1966)
Equality of Educational Opportunity
R.A. Berk (2003)
Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique
C. Winship, M. Sobel (2004)
Handbook of Data Analysis
J.D. Angrist, G.W. Imbens, D.B. Rubin (1996)
Identification of causal effects using instrumental variablesJ. Am. Stat. Assoc., 91
C. Winship, S.L. Morgan (2007)
Counterfactuals for Causal Inference
C. Winship, S.L. Morgan (1999)
The estimation of causal effects from observational studiesAnnu. Rev. Sociol., 25
J.J. Heckman (1979)
Sample selection bias as a specification errorEconometrica, 47
This article examines the use of various research designs in the social sciences as well as the choices that are made when a quasi-experimental design is used. A content analysis was carried out on articles published in 18 social science journals with various impact factors. The presence of quasi-experimental studies was investigated as well as choices in the design and analysis stage. It was found that quasi-experimental designs are not very often used in the inspected journals, and when they are applied they are not very well designed and analyzed. These findings suggest that the literature on how to deal with selection bias has not yet found its way to the practice of the applied researcher.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 4, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.