Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Kleinbaum, L. Kupper, K. Muller, A. Nizam (1998)
Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 3rd ed.
J. Hampton (1979)
Polymorphous Concepts in Semantic MemoryJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18
A. Tversky (1977)
Features of SimilarityPsychological Review, 84
G Frege (1893)
56
J. Prinz (2005)
The Return of Concept Empiricism
H. Jahn (2013)
Memory loss in Alzheimer's diseaseDialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 15
J. Steiger (1980)
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 87
George Cree, K. McRae, Larry Barsalou, Mike Dixon, Jeff Elman, Albert Katz (2008)
Category - Specific semantic deficits
L. Gabora, E. Rosch, Diederik Aerts (2008)
Toward an Ecological Theory of ConceptsEcological Psychology, 20
P. Pexman, G. Holyk, M. Monfils (2003)
Number-of-features effects and semantic processingMemory & Cognition, 31
G. Vigliocco, D. Vinson, W. Lewis, M. Garrett (2004)
Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesisCognitive Psychology, 48
Subhash Sharma, D. Kleinbaum, L. Kupper (1978)
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods
Ray Grondin, S. Lupker, K. McRae (2009)
Shared Features Dominate Semantic Richness Effects for Concrete Concepts.Journal of memory and language, 60 1
E Rosch (1973)
Cognitive Development and the acquisition of Language
KK Chang, T Mitchell, MA Just (2011)
Quantitative modeling of the neural representation of objects: How semantic feature norms can account for fMRI activationNeuroImage, 56
LW Barsalou (1987)
Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization
E. Pothos, A. Wills (2011)
Formal Approaches in Categorization: Contents
P. Converse (2004)
The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics
(2011)
Nonparametric Bayesian models of cate
T. Griffiths, Adam Sanborn, K. Canini, D. Navarro, J. Tenenbaum (2011)
Formal Approaches in Categorization: Nonparametric Bayesian models of categorization
LW Barsalou (1993)
29
Barry Devereux, L. Tyler, J. Geertzen, B. Randall (2013)
The Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain (CSLB) concept property normsBehavior Research Methods, 46
(2002)
The impact of feed-back
K. Chang, Tom Mitchell, M. Just (2016)
From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 2011 Quantitative modeling of the neural representation of objects : How semantic feature norms can account for fMRI activation
WD Goh (2016)
976Frontiers in Psychology, 7
KK Chang (2011)
716NeuroImage, 56
Ling-ling Wu, L. Barsalou (2009)
Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation.Acta psychologica, 132 2
K. McRae, George Cree, Mark Seidenberg, C. McNorgan (2005)
Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving thingsBehavior Research Methods, 37
L. Barsalou (2019)
Flexibility, Structure, and Linguistic Vagary in Concepts: Manifestations of a Compositional System of Perceptual SymbolsTheories of Memory
P. Pexman, Paul Siakaluk, M. Yap (2013)
Introduction to the research topic meaning in mind: semantic richness effects in language processingFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7
P. Pexman, Ian Hargreaves, Paul Siakaluk, Glen Bodner, Jamie Pope (2008)
There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognitionPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15
LW Barsalou (1987)
101
P. Pexman, S. Lupker, Y. Hino (2002)
The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasksPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9
PE Converse (1964)
206
PE Converse (1964)
Ideology and discontent
J. Hair (1972)
Multivariate data analysisInternational Statistical Review, 40
Walter HEUVEN, Paweł Mandera, Emmanuel Keuleers, M. Brysbaert (2014)
Subtlex-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British EnglishQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67
Gregory Murphy (2002)
The Big Book of Concepts
J. Prinz (2005)
Chapter 30 – THE RETURN OF CONCEPT EMPIRICISM
LW Barsalou (1993)
Theories of memory
M. Brysbaert, Boris New (2009)
Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American EnglishBehavior Research Methods, 41
PG Schyns, RL Goldstone, JP Thibaut (1998)
The development of features in object conceptsBrain and Behavioral Sciences, 21
R. Perri, G. Zannino, C. Caltagirone, G. Carlesimo (2012)
Alzheimer's disease and semantic deficits: a feature-listing study.Neuropsychology, 26 5
Sergio Chaigneau, E. Canessa, Joaquín Gaete (2012)
Conceptual agreement theoryNew Ideas in Psychology, 30
E. Rosch (1973)
ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES1
H. Glock (2009)
Concepts: Where Subjectivism Goes WrongPhilosophy, 84
E. Rosch, C. Simpson, R. Miller (1976)
Structural bases of typicality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2
E. Rosch, C. Mervis (1975)
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categoriesCognitive Psychology, 7
E. Canessa, Sergio Chaigneau (2016)
When are concepts comparable across minds?Quality & Quantity, 50
Gabriel Recchia, Michael Jones (2012)
The semantic richness of abstract conceptsFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6
G Frege (1893)
Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege
F. Ashby, Leola Alfonso-reese (1995)
Categorization as probability density estimationJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 39
GS Cree (2003)
163Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132
K. McRae, George Cree, R. Westmacott, V. Sa (1999)
Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory.Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale, 53 4
E. Pothos (2011)
Comprar Formal Approaches In Categorization. | Emmanuel M. Pothos | 9780521140720 | Cambridge University Press
C. McNorgan, Rachel Kotack, Deborah Meehan, K. McRae (2007)
Feature-feature causal relations and statistical co-occurrences in object conceptsMemory & Cognition, 35
JJ Prinz (2005)
Categorization and cognitive science
M. Reimer (2006)
Sense and Reference
P. Schyns, Robert Goldstone, J. Thibaut (1998)
The development of features in object conceptsBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 21
GS Cree, K McRae (2003)
Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns)Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132
Winston Goh, M. Yap, Mabel Lau, Melvin Ng, Luuan-Chin Tan (2016)
Semantic Richness Effects in Spoken Word Recognition: A Lexical Decision and Semantic Categorization MegastudyFrontiers in Psychology, 7
A. Santos, Sergio Chaigneau, W. Simmons, L. Barsalou (2011)
Property generation reflects word association and situated simulation, 3
(2011)
Formal approaches in categorization
L. Barsalou (1987)
The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts
B. Russell (2004)
Problems Of PhilosophySynthese, 131
It is generally believed that concepts can be characterized by their properties (or features). When investigating concepts encoded in language, researchers often ask subjects to produce lists of properties that describe them (i.e., the Property Listing Task, PLT). These lists are accumulated to produce Conceptual Property Norms (CPNs). CPNs contain frequency distributions of properties for individual concepts. It is widely believed that these distributions represent the underlying semantic structure of those concepts. Here, instead of focusing on the underlying semantic structure, we aim at characterizing the PLT. An often disregarded aspect of the PLT is that individuals show intersubject variability (i.e., they produce only partially overlapping lists). In our study we use a mathematical analysis of this intersubject variability to guide our inquiry. To this end, we resort to a set of publicly available norms that contain information about the specific properties that were informed at the individual subject level. Our results suggest that when an individual is performing the PLT, he or she generates a list of properties that is a mixture of general and distinctive properties, such that there is a non-linear tendency to produce more general than distinctive properties. Furthermore, the low generality properties are precisely those that tend not to be repeated across lists, accounting in this manner for part of the intersubject variability. In consequence, any manipulation that may affect the mixture of general and distinctive properties in lists is bound to change intersubject variability. We discuss why these results are important for researchers using the PLT.
Behavior Research Methods – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 22, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.