The Revised Quality Standards: “A Man’s Reach Should Exceed His Grasp” or “A Bridge Too Far”: Which is the Case?

The Revised Quality Standards: “A Man’s Reach Should Exceed His Grasp” or “A Bridge Too... Prev Sci (2015) 16:933–937 DOI 10.1007/s11121-015-0583-6 The Revised Quality Standards: BAMan’s Reach Should Exceed His Grasp^ or BA Bridge Too Far^: Which is the Case? 1,2 Leonard Bickman Published online: 2 August 2015 Society for Prevention Research 2015 Introduction monitoring program integrity over time; (f) measurement of the programs’ effects; (g) the establishment of reasonable and I feel confident, knowing many of the members of the task meaningful comparison or control groups; and (h) problems of force who developed the revised standards, that several of the low base rate for establishing sample size. These issues are addressed in the revised standards. These issues, which were ideas or concerns that I am going to address are not new to them. I am assuming that if my viewpoints are not reflected in not clearly recognized almost 30 years ago, are now an inte- the standards’ documents, they were either not considered gral part of standards for the next generation. However, I see sufficiently important, or they did not achieve the consensus the implications of some of these standards in a somewhat required for a document birthed by a committee. I have tried to different perspective than what is expressed in the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Prevention Science Springer Journals

The Revised Quality Standards: “A Man’s Reach Should Exceed His Grasp” or “A Bridge Too Far”: Which is the Case?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-revised-quality-standards-a-man-s-reach-should-exceed-his-grasp-or-F0amJJV180
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Society for Prevention Research
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Public Health; Health Psychology; Child and School Psychology
ISSN
1389-4986
eISSN
1573-6695
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11121-015-0583-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Prev Sci (2015) 16:933–937 DOI 10.1007/s11121-015-0583-6 The Revised Quality Standards: BAMan’s Reach Should Exceed His Grasp^ or BA Bridge Too Far^: Which is the Case? 1,2 Leonard Bickman Published online: 2 August 2015 Society for Prevention Research 2015 Introduction monitoring program integrity over time; (f) measurement of the programs’ effects; (g) the establishment of reasonable and I feel confident, knowing many of the members of the task meaningful comparison or control groups; and (h) problems of force who developed the revised standards, that several of the low base rate for establishing sample size. These issues are addressed in the revised standards. These issues, which were ideas or concerns that I am going to address are not new to them. I am assuming that if my viewpoints are not reflected in not clearly recognized almost 30 years ago, are now an inte- the standards’ documents, they were either not considered gral part of standards for the next generation. However, I see sufficiently important, or they did not achieve the consensus the implications of some of these standards in a somewhat required for a document birthed by a committee. I have tried to different perspective than what is expressed in the

Journal

Prevention ScienceSpringer Journals

Published: Aug 2, 2015

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off