Prev Sci (2015) 16:933–937 DOI 10.1007/s11121-015-0583-6 The Revised Quality Standards: BAMan’s Reach Should Exceed His Grasp^ or BA Bridge Too Far^: Which is the Case? 1,2 Leonard Bickman Published online: 2 August 2015 Society for Prevention Research 2015 Introduction monitoring program integrity over time; (f) measurement of the programs’ effects; (g) the establishment of reasonable and I feel confident, knowing many of the members of the task meaningful comparison or control groups; and (h) problems of force who developed the revised standards, that several of the low base rate for establishing sample size. These issues are addressed in the revised standards. These issues, which were ideas or concerns that I am going to address are not new to them. I am assuming that if my viewpoints are not reflected in not clearly recognized almost 30 years ago, are now an inte- the standards’ documents, they were either not considered gral part of standards for the next generation. However, I see sufficiently important, or they did not achieve the consensus the implications of some of these standards in a somewhat required for a document birthed by a committee. I have tried to different perspective than what is expressed in the
Prevention Science – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 2, 2015
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud