Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Marjorie Taylor, S. Carlson (2002)
Pretending and imagination in animals and children: Imaginary companions and elaborate fantasy in childhood: discontinuity with nonhuman animals
J Bowlby (1979)
Attachment and loss
V Masih (1978)
Piagetian theory and the helping professions
M. Svendsen (1934)
CHILDREN'S IMAGINARY COMPANIONSJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 32
H. Steele, M. Steele, M. Woolgar, S. Yabsley, Carla Croft, Dana Johnson, P. Fonagy (1997)
Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development
P. Selby, M. Schechter, Humanitarian Affairs (1982)
The Individual and the Family
R. Benson, David Pryor (1973)
“When Friends Fall Out”: Developmental Interference with the Function of Some Imaginary CompanionsJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 21
M. Bekoff (2001)
Social Play Behaviour: Cooperation, Fairness, Trust, and the Evolution of Morality
Marjorie Taylor, S. Carlson (1997)
The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind.Child development, 68 3
T. Gleason (1999)
Social Provisions of Real and Imaginary Relationships.
Marjorie Taylor, Bridget Cartwright, S. Carlson (1993)
A developmental investigation of children's imaginary companions.Developmental Psychology, 29
T. Gleason, Raceel Jarudi, J. Cheek (2003)
Imagination, personality, and imaginary companionsSocial Behavior and Personality, 31
J. Farver (1992)
Communicating Shared Meaning in Social Pretend Play.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7
Thomas Henricks (2015)
Play as ExperienceAmerican Journal of Play, 8
Marjorie Taylor, S. Carlson, Alison Shawber (2007)
Autonomy and control in children's interactions with imaginary companions, 147
Tracy Gleason, A. Sebanc, W. Hartup (2000)
Imaginary companions of preschool children.Developmental psychology, 36 4
Marjorie Taylor, A. Hulette, T. Dishion (2010)
Longitudinal outcomes of young high-risk adolescents with imaginary companions.Developmental psychology, 46 6
R Weiss (1974)
Doing unto others
T. Gleason, M. Kalpidou (2014)
Imaginary Companions and Young Children's Coping and CompetenceSocial Development, 23
Marjorie Taylor, Candice Mottweiler (2008)
Imaginary Companions: Pretending They Are Real but Knowing They Are Not.American Journal of Play, 1
Eva Hoff (2004)
A Friend Living inside Me—The Forms and Functions of Imaginary CompanionsImagination, Cognition and Personality, 24
J. Connolly, A. Doyle (1984)
Relation of Social Fantasy Play to Social Competence in PreschoolersDevelopmental Psychology, 20
LS Vygotsky (1967)
Play and its role in the mental development of the childSoviet Psychology, 5
Marjorie Taylor (2013)
The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination
(1968)
The preschool child: 1
C. Maddux, Sharon Maddux (1983)
Peer RelationsIntervention in School and Clinic, 18
A. Pellegrini (1992)
Rough‐and‐tumble play and social problem solving flexibilityCreativity Research Journal, 5
L. Ames, J. Learned (1946)
Imaginary companions and related phenomena.The Journal of genetic psychology, 69 2
M. Manosevitz, N. Prentice, F. Wilson (1973)
Individual and family correlates of imaginary companions in preschool children.Developmental Psychology, 8
Bruce Klein (1985)
A child's imaginary companion: A transitional selfClinical Social Work Journal, 13
Gabriel Trionfi, E. Reese (2009)
A good story: children with imaginary companions create richer narratives.Child development, 80 4
(2017)
Constructing the ensemble: Negotiating life with (in) play. Manuscript submitted for publication
T. Gleason (2002)
Social provisions of real and imaginary relationships in early childhood.Developmental psychology, 38 6
S. Carlson, Marjorie Taylor (2005)
Imaginary Companions and Impersonated Characters: Sex Differences in Children's Fantasy PlayMerrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51
Angeline Lillard, David Witherington (2004)
Mothers' behavior modifications during pretense and their possible signal value for toddlers.Developmental psychology, 40 1
M Svendsen (1934)
Children’s imaginary companionsArchives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 32
E Newson, JL Newson (1968)
London
Angeline Lillard, M. Lerner, Emily Hopkins, Rebecca Dore, Eric Smith, Carolyn Palmquist (2013)
The impact of pretend play on children's development: a review of the evidence.Psychological bulletin, 139 1
T. Gleason, Lisa Hohmann (2006)
Concepts of Real and Imaginary Friendships in Early ChildhoodSocial Development, 15
D. Singer, J. Singer (1990)
The House of Make-Believe
R. Weiss (1974)
The provisions of social relationships
L Ames (1946)
147Journal of Genetic Psychology, 69
S. Pellis, A. Iwaniuk (1999)
The Problem of Adult Play Fighting: A Comparative Analysis of Play and Courtship in PrimatesEthology, 105
M. Bekoff (1995)
Play Signals as Punctuation: The Structure of Social Play in CanidsBehaviour, 132
R. Feldman (2017)
The Neurobiology of Human AttachmentsTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 21
J Partington, C Grant (1984)
Play in animals and humans
Marjorie Taylor (1999)
Imaginary Companions and the Children Who Create Them
H. Work (1959)
The Magic YearsPediatrics
Marjorie Taylor, S. Carlson, Bayta Maring, L. Gerow, C. Charley (2004)
The characteristics and correlates of fantasy in school-age children: imaginary companions, impersonation, and social understanding.Developmental psychology, 40 6
(1984)
Imaginary playmates and other useful fantasies
Rachel White, S. Carlson (2016)
What would Batman do? Self-distancing improves executive function in young children.Developmental science, 19 3
L. Vygotsky (1967)
Play and Its Role in the Mental Development of the ChildJournal of Russian and East European Psychology, 5
(1983)
Analyzing close relationships
S. Durand, J. Schank (2015)
The evolution of social play by learning to cooperateAdaptive Behavior, 23
L. Frank (1935)
The Society for Research in Child Development, 9
R. Cocking, K. Renninger (1993)
The Development and Meaning of Psychological Distance
R. Cocking, K. Renninger, Ann Renninger (2013)
The Centrality of a Distancing Model for the Development of Representational Competence
Anna Roby, E. Kidd (2008)
The referential communication skills of children with imaginary companions.Developmental science, 11 4
Paula Bouldin, C. Pratt (2002)
A systematic assessment of the specific fears, anxiety level, and temperament of children with imaginary companionsAustralian Journal of Psychology, 54
R. Kastenbaum, Lynn Fox (2008)
Do Imaginary Companions Die? An Exploratory StudyOMEGA — Journal of Death and Dying, 56
(2003)
Pretending and Imagination in Animals and ChildrenApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 82
Joseph Flanders, Vanessa Leo, D. Paquette, R. Pihl, J. Séguin (2009)
Rough-and-tumble play and the regulation of aggression: an observational study of father-child play dyads.Aggressive behavior, 35 4
(2002)
Bumping into Mr . Ravioli : A theory of busyness , and its hero
S. Pellis, V. Pellis (2007)
Rough-and-Tumble Play and the Development of the Social BrainCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 16
M Bekoff (2001)
81Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8
David Pearson, H. Rouse, S. Doswell, C. Ainsworth, O. Dawson, K. Simms, L. Edwards, J. Faulconbridge (2001)
Prevalence of imaginary companions in a normal child population.Child: care, health and development, 27 1
T Gleason (2013)
Handbook of the development of imagination
Although social play is common to many species, humans are unique in their ability to extract some of the benefits of social play through imagination. For example, in play with imaginary companions (ICs), children often practice skills that might be useful for later adaptive social, relational, and emotional functioning. While play with ICs does not provide the same immediate feedback that play with real others affords, this imagined, quasisocial context allows children to experiment with or rehearse events that might occur in real relationships. This symbolic enactment of social relationships might afford opportunities to experience not just social situations but all manner of positive and negative emotions in a risk-free way. In addition, children’s interactions with real others around their ICs allow for negotiation of social roles in real relationships. ICs also provide a forum for psychological distance that might help young children manage their real relationships and engage in processes such as negotiation and cooperation, which are needed for successful social adaptation. Although play with ICs is clearly not of adaptive value in an evolutionary sense, for the children who create them, ICs might hold psychological significance for adaptive social development.
Learning & Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 13, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.