The influence of harvesting method on morphological changes in sural nerve graft and on the quality of motor and sensory recovery

The influence of harvesting method on morphological changes in sural nerve graft and on the... Eur J Plast Surg (2004) 27:47 DOI 10.1007/s00238-004-0607-0 LE TT ER TO T H E E DITOR O. C. Aszmann The influence of harvesting method on morphological changes in sural nerve graft and on the quality of motor and sensory recovery Published online: 10 March 2004 Springer-Verlag 2004 Dear Sir directive axonal growth, but are also needed for non- With interest I have read the article of Dr. Ivo Dzepina. neural cell populations for differentiation and physical This study claims that the use of ‘non-traumatized’ sural integration. In recent years the importance of different nerve grafts provide a better outcome than those harvested surface molecules to aid in nerve regeneration have been with the more traumatizing harvesting method of multiple more appreciated. It has been understood that protruding transverse sections. growth cones of the regenerating axons need a permissive The rationale is that ‘extensive ultrastructural damage substratum to successfully regenerate across longer dis- with multi-focal fragmentation of myelin sheath...’ that tances. In conventional nerve grafts extracellular matrix did not occur in the proposed harvesting technique, which molecules such as laminin-1, fibronectin, as well as more inflicts a longitudinal scar from knee to ankle, present specialized cell surface molecules from either the integrin such dramatic insult to regenerating axons, that the or the cadherin family are ubiquitous. Furthermore, this outcome is significantly poorer. matrix is evidently necessary for appropriate differenti- Much could be said about the patient population, and ation and induction of specific gene expression of a evaluation techniques used, however, I want to simply number of non-neural cells such as Schwann cells, fibro- ask the author what he thinks will happen to the harvest- blasts or migrating macrophages. These in turn will pro- ed nerve after grafting. Yes, the nerve will degener- vide the necessary humeral environment for regenerating ate, Schwann cells will undergo dramatic morphological nerve fibres to survive the transient target-less state. changes, and the so precious myelin sheath will disinte- The conventional nerve graft so far is the only bio- grate! What is left is a disaster of cell debris, macrophages logical resource we have that provides this environment, cleaning the mess and reactive Schwann cells providing a and it is too simplistic a thought to believe that the humoral environment conducive to axonal regeneration. method of harvest will make a difference and I strongly With whatever method the nerve is harvested, after a few disagree with the author’s conclusion. days they will all look alike. Lastly, figure 1 and figure 2 are micrographs of the Regenerating axons require an environment that pro- same specimen of supposedly two different nerves, har- vides polymeric networks of several types of different vested with different techniques! macromolecules that not only serve as physical cues for O. C. Aszmann ( ) Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Vienna, School of Medicine, Whringer Grtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria e-mail: oskar.aszmann@univie.ac.at http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

The influence of harvesting method on morphological changes in sural nerve graft and on the quality of motor and sensory recovery

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-influence-of-harvesting-method-on-morphological-changes-in-sural-I3UeHSxCN7
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-004-0607-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Plast Surg (2004) 27:47 DOI 10.1007/s00238-004-0607-0 LE TT ER TO T H E E DITOR O. C. Aszmann The influence of harvesting method on morphological changes in sural nerve graft and on the quality of motor and sensory recovery Published online: 10 March 2004 Springer-Verlag 2004 Dear Sir directive axonal growth, but are also needed for non- With interest I have read the article of Dr. Ivo Dzepina. neural cell populations for differentiation and physical This study claims that the use of ‘non-traumatized’ sural integration. In recent years the importance of different nerve grafts provide a better outcome than those harvested surface molecules to aid in nerve regeneration have been with the more traumatizing harvesting method of multiple more appreciated. It has been understood that protruding transverse sections. growth cones of the regenerating axons need a permissive The rationale is that ‘extensive ultrastructural damage substratum to successfully regenerate across longer dis- with multi-focal fragmentation of myelin sheath...’ that tances. In conventional nerve grafts extracellular matrix did not occur in the proposed harvesting technique, which molecules such as laminin-1, fibronectin, as well as more inflicts a longitudinal scar from knee to ankle, present specialized cell surface molecules from either the integrin such dramatic insult to regenerating axons, that the or the cadherin family are ubiquitous. Furthermore, this outcome is significantly poorer. matrix is evidently necessary for appropriate differenti- Much could be said about the patient population, and ation and induction of specific gene expression of a evaluation techniques used, however, I want to simply number of non-neural cells such as Schwann cells, fibro- ask the author what he thinks will happen to the harvest- blasts or migrating macrophages. These in turn will pro- ed nerve after grafting. Yes, the nerve will degener- vide the necessary humeral environment for regenerating ate, Schwann cells will undergo dramatic morphological nerve fibres to survive the transient target-less state. changes, and the so precious myelin sheath will disinte- The conventional nerve graft so far is the only bio- grate! What is left is a disaster of cell debris, macrophages logical resource we have that provides this environment, cleaning the mess and reactive Schwann cells providing a and it is too simplistic a thought to believe that the humoral environment conducive to axonal regeneration. method of harvest will make a difference and I strongly With whatever method the nerve is harvested, after a few disagree with the author’s conclusion. days they will all look alike. Lastly, figure 1 and figure 2 are micrographs of the Regenerating axons require an environment that pro- same specimen of supposedly two different nerves, har- vides polymeric networks of several types of different vested with different techniques! macromolecules that not only serve as physical cues for O. C. Aszmann ( ) Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Vienna, School of Medicine, Whringer Grtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria e-mail: oskar.aszmann@univie.ac.at

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Apr 1, 2004

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off