The good, the bad, and the ugly: A critical look at species and their institutions from a user's perspective

The good, the bad, and the ugly: A critical look at species and their institutions from a user's... edition (Robins et al., 1991). We share the widespread are real natural entities (e.g. Kottelat, 1997). However, consensus that where codes and common names have by introducing subspecies as another supposedly real a role this is only in addition to, not as a substitute for, entity below the species level, species and sub- scientific names. species become somehow interchangeable units, with Some types of publications proved to be extremely numerous negative consequences. helpful to our work and thus deserve mention in the For example, relational databases are well suited ‘good’ category. These include global works such as for handling large amounts of information in a struc- Nelson’s (1994) Fishes of the World,Eschmeyer’s tured and efficient way, and are the tool of choice (1990) Catalog of the Genera of Recent Fishes and for taxonomic and biological databases (Eschmeyer, (1998) Catalog of Fishes, as well as large-scale, well- 1990, 1998; Froese, 1998b). However, we could not structured family revisions such as those published find a satisfactory solution for dealing with subspecies by the Species Identification and Data Programme of in a relational database design. The hierarchy of class, the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United order, family, genus, species, and http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Springer Journals

The good, the bad, and the ugly: A critical look at species and their institutions from a user's perspective

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-a-critical-look-at-species-and-their-Lpaw0Vs94Z
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Subject
Life Sciences; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Zoology
ISSN
0960-3166
eISSN
1573-5184
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1008915531238
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

edition (Robins et al., 1991). We share the widespread are real natural entities (e.g. Kottelat, 1997). However, consensus that where codes and common names have by introducing subspecies as another supposedly real a role this is only in addition to, not as a substitute for, entity below the species level, species and sub- scientific names. species become somehow interchangeable units, with Some types of publications proved to be extremely numerous negative consequences. helpful to our work and thus deserve mention in the For example, relational databases are well suited ‘good’ category. These include global works such as for handling large amounts of information in a struc- Nelson’s (1994) Fishes of the World,Eschmeyer’s tured and efficient way, and are the tool of choice (1990) Catalog of the Genera of Recent Fishes and for taxonomic and biological databases (Eschmeyer, (1998) Catalog of Fishes, as well as large-scale, well- 1990, 1998; Froese, 1998b). However, we could not structured family revisions such as those published find a satisfactory solution for dealing with subspecies by the Species Identification and Data Programme of in a relational database design. The hierarchy of class, the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United order, family, genus, species, and

Journal

Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 15, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off