The evolution of diadromy in fishes (revisited) and its place in phylogenetic analysis

The evolution of diadromy in fishes (revisited) and its place in phylogenetic analysis Diadromy is a term used to describe migrations of fishes between fresh waters and the sea; these migrations are regular, physiologically mediated movements which occur at predictable life history phases in each diadromous species, they involve most members of a species' populations, and they are usually obligatory. Around 250 fish species are regarded as diadromous. A review of the life history strategies amongst families of fishes that include diadromous species provides little support for a suggested scenario for their evolution that involves: (1) evolution of anadromy via amphidromy from fishes of marine origins, and (2) evolution of catadromy through amphidromy from fishes of freshwater origins, even though these scenarios seem intuitively reasonable. The various forms of diadromy appear to have had multiple independent origins amongst diverse fish groups. There is increasing confidence that behavioural characteristics of animals are heuristic in gener ating and interpreting phylogenies. However, examination of fishes shows wide variability of diadromous life histories within closely related families and genera, within species, and there is even ontogenetic variation in patterns of behaviour by individual fish. In addition, there is multiple loss of diadromy in many diadromous fish species in which the life history becomes restricted to fresh waters. This variation suggests that diadromy is a behavioural character of dubious worth in determining phylogenetic relationships. Moreover, it appears to have been an ancestral condition in some fish families, such as Anguillidae, Salmonidae, Galaxiidae, Osmeridae, and others, and perhaps in the whole salmonoid/osmeroid/galaxioid complex of families. This, too, makes diadromy of dubious worth in phylogenetic analysis http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Springer Journals

The evolution of diadromy in fishes (revisited) and its place in phylogenetic analysis

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-evolution-of-diadromy-in-fishes-revisited-and-its-place-in-A8yjq7qPTz
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Chapman and Hall
Subject
Life Sciences; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Zoology
ISSN
0960-3166
eISSN
1573-5184
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1018404331601
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Diadromy is a term used to describe migrations of fishes between fresh waters and the sea; these migrations are regular, physiologically mediated movements which occur at predictable life history phases in each diadromous species, they involve most members of a species' populations, and they are usually obligatory. Around 250 fish species are regarded as diadromous. A review of the life history strategies amongst families of fishes that include diadromous species provides little support for a suggested scenario for their evolution that involves: (1) evolution of anadromy via amphidromy from fishes of marine origins, and (2) evolution of catadromy through amphidromy from fishes of freshwater origins, even though these scenarios seem intuitively reasonable. The various forms of diadromy appear to have had multiple independent origins amongst diverse fish groups. There is increasing confidence that behavioural characteristics of animals are heuristic in gener ating and interpreting phylogenies. However, examination of fishes shows wide variability of diadromous life histories within closely related families and genera, within species, and there is even ontogenetic variation in patterns of behaviour by individual fish. In addition, there is multiple loss of diadromy in many diadromous fish species in which the life history becomes restricted to fresh waters. This variation suggests that diadromy is a behavioural character of dubious worth in determining phylogenetic relationships. Moreover, it appears to have been an ancestral condition in some fish families, such as Anguillidae, Salmonidae, Galaxiidae, Osmeridae, and others, and perhaps in the whole salmonoid/osmeroid/galaxioid complex of families. This, too, makes diadromy of dubious worth in phylogenetic analysis

Journal

Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 14, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off