Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
William Pluta, B. Richards, Andrew Mutnick (2013)
PBL and Beyond: Trends in Collaborative LearningTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 25
K. Mann (2011)
Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilitiesMedical Education, 45
C. White, E. Bradley, J. Martindale, P. Roy, Kunal Patel, Michelle Yoon, M. Worden (2014)
Why are medical students ‘checking out’ of active learning in a new curriculum?Medical Education, 48
H. Khan, A. Khattak, I. Mahsud, A. Munir, Shaukat Ali, Muhammad Khan, M. Saleem, S. Shah (2003)
Impact of class attendance upon examination results of students in basic medical sciences.Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC, 15 2
C. Prober, C. Heath (2012)
Lecture halls without lectures--a proposal for medical education.The New England journal of medicine, 366 18
B. Hazlehurst (2015)
When I say … distributed cognitionMedical Education, 49
(2010)
Class attendance in college: a meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics
Medical students are faced with the challenge of assimilating a large amount of content in a short period of time. They are motivated to look for the most efficient approach to learning and to perform well on their national licensing examinations. Medical schools are driven by accrediting agencies to reform their curriculum to increase active and collaborative learning opportunities. This prospective study evaluated the performance outcomes of an active small-group instructional session on benign colonic disorders between students who attended the session and those who did not. All students had access to the same materials and the recordings of the session through the university’s learning management system. Performance was determined by a 12-question pre-/posttest as well as the related items on the course’s final examination. All students performed significantly better on the posttest compared to the pretest (“Yes” attended and “No” did not attend: pre/post p < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups on posttest performance (p = 0.59) or on the related questions on the final examination [Yes/No, 83.7/85.6% (p = 0.56)]. However, students who attended the session had a lower score on the remainder of the examination than those who did not attend the session [Yes/No, 81.8/85.0% (p = 0.04)] suggesting that the in-class small-group activity may have had a protective effect on performance. This study showed that participation in an active learning session was non-inferior and may benefit students that would have otherwise had lower performance justifying the large faculty effort in designing and delivering this modality.
Medical Science Educator – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 9, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.