The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory

The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory Many social phenomena can be viewed as processes in which individuals in social groups develop agreement (e.g., public opinion, the spreading of rumor, the formation of social and linguistic conventions). Conceptual Agreement Theory (CAT) models social agreement as a simplified communicational event in which an Observer $$(O)$$ ( O ) and Actor $$(A)$$ ( A ) exchange ideas about a concept $$C$$ C , and where $$O$$ O uses that information to infer whether $$A$$ A ’s conceptual state is the same as its own (i.e., to infer agreement). Agreement may be true (when $$O$$ O infers that $$A$$ A is thinking $$C$$ C and this is in fact the case, event $$a1$$ a 1 ) or illusory (when $$O$$ O infers that $$A$$ A is thinking $$C$$ C and this is not the case, event $$a2$$ a 2 ). In CAT, concepts that afford $$a1$$ a 1 or $$a2$$ a 2 become more salient in the minds of members of social groups. Results from an agent-based model (ABM) and probabilistic model that implement CAT show that, as our conceptual analyses suggested would be the case, the simulated social system selects concepts according to their usefulness to agents in promoting agreement among them (Experiment 1). Furthermore, the ABM exhibits more complex dynamics where similar minded agents cluster and are able to retain useful concepts even when a different group of agents discards them (Experiment 2). We discuss the relevance of CAT and the current findings for analyzing different social communication events, and suggest ways in which CAT could be put to empirical test. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality & Quantity Springer Journals

The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-dynamics-of-social-agreement-according-to-conceptual-agreement-xoIq75QZLE
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Social Sciences, general; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0033-5177
eISSN
1573-7845
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11135-013-9957-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Many social phenomena can be viewed as processes in which individuals in social groups develop agreement (e.g., public opinion, the spreading of rumor, the formation of social and linguistic conventions). Conceptual Agreement Theory (CAT) models social agreement as a simplified communicational event in which an Observer $$(O)$$ ( O ) and Actor $$(A)$$ ( A ) exchange ideas about a concept $$C$$ C , and where $$O$$ O uses that information to infer whether $$A$$ A ’s conceptual state is the same as its own (i.e., to infer agreement). Agreement may be true (when $$O$$ O infers that $$A$$ A is thinking $$C$$ C and this is in fact the case, event $$a1$$ a 1 ) or illusory (when $$O$$ O infers that $$A$$ A is thinking $$C$$ C and this is not the case, event $$a2$$ a 2 ). In CAT, concepts that afford $$a1$$ a 1 or $$a2$$ a 2 become more salient in the minds of members of social groups. Results from an agent-based model (ABM) and probabilistic model that implement CAT show that, as our conceptual analyses suggested would be the case, the simulated social system selects concepts according to their usefulness to agents in promoting agreement among them (Experiment 1). Furthermore, the ABM exhibits more complex dynamics where similar minded agents cluster and are able to retain useful concepts even when a different group of agents discards them (Experiment 2). We discuss the relevance of CAT and the current findings for analyzing different social communication events, and suggest ways in which CAT could be put to empirical test.

Journal

Quality & QuantitySpringer Journals

Published: Nov 27, 2013

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off