The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory

The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory Many social phenomena can be viewed as processes in which individuals in social groups develop agreement (e.g., public opinion, the spreading of rumor, the formation of social and linguistic conventions). Conceptual Agreement Theory (CAT) models social agreement as a simplified communicational event in which an Observer $$(O)$$ ( O ) and Actor $$(A)$$ ( A ) exchange ideas about a concept $$C$$ C , and where $$O$$ O uses that information to infer whether $$A$$ A ’s conceptual state is the same as its own (i.e., to infer agreement). Agreement may be true (when $$O$$ O infers that $$A$$ A is thinking $$C$$ C and this is in fact the case, event $$a1$$ a 1 ) or illusory (when $$O$$ O infers that $$A$$ A is thinking $$C$$ C and this is not the case, event $$a2$$ a 2 ). In CAT, concepts that afford $$a1$$ a 1 or $$a2$$ a 2 become more salient in the minds of members of social groups. Results from an agent-based model (ABM) and probabilistic model that implement CAT show that, as our conceptual analyses suggested would be the case, the simulated social system selects concepts according to their usefulness to agents in promoting agreement among them (Experiment 1). Furthermore, the ABM exhibits more complex dynamics where similar minded agents cluster and are able to retain useful concepts even when a different group of agents discards them (Experiment 2). We discuss the relevance of CAT and the current findings for analyzing different social communication events, and suggest ways in which CAT could be put to empirical test. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality & Quantity Springer Journals

The dynamics of social agreement according to Conceptual Agreement Theory

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-dynamics-of-social-agreement-according-to-conceptual-agreement-xoIq75QZLE
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Social Sciences, general; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0033-5177
eISSN
1573-7845
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11135-013-9957-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Many social phenomena can be viewed as processes in which individuals in social groups develop agreement (e.g., public opinion, the spreading of rumor, the formation of social and linguistic conventions). Conceptual Agreement Theory (CAT) models social agreement as a simplified communicational event in which an Observer $$(O)$$ ( O ) and Actor $$(A)$$ ( A ) exchange ideas about a concept $$C$$ C , and where $$O$$ O uses that information to infer whether $$A$$ A ’s conceptual state is the same as its own (i.e., to infer agreement). Agreement may be true (when $$O$$ O infers that $$A$$ A is thinking $$C$$ C and this is in fact the case, event $$a1$$ a 1 ) or illusory (when $$O$$ O infers that $$A$$ A is thinking $$C$$ C and this is not the case, event $$a2$$ a 2 ). In CAT, concepts that afford $$a1$$ a 1 or $$a2$$ a 2 become more salient in the minds of members of social groups. Results from an agent-based model (ABM) and probabilistic model that implement CAT show that, as our conceptual analyses suggested would be the case, the simulated social system selects concepts according to their usefulness to agents in promoting agreement among them (Experiment 1). Furthermore, the ABM exhibits more complex dynamics where similar minded agents cluster and are able to retain useful concepts even when a different group of agents discards them (Experiment 2). We discuss the relevance of CAT and the current findings for analyzing different social communication events, and suggest ways in which CAT could be put to empirical test.

Journal

Quality & QuantitySpringer Journals

Published: Nov 27, 2013

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off