The conceptions about managing coordination in Iranian governmental machinery: a Q methodology study

The conceptions about managing coordination in Iranian governmental machinery: a Q methodology study Alignment among governmental organizations is one of the major national concerns in all political systems. The origin of this concern is the weakness of “horizontal management” which refers to horizontal coordination among all organization that exercise national governance. One of the important influences on horizontal management is the attitudes and perceptions of governing elites. This paper focuses on perceptions of barriers to coordination in government among public administrators, programming elites, politicians and academics involved in the government system. The authors use the inductive research technique Q-methodology, which is a research method used to study people’s “subjectivity”, to investigate the views of of 50 members of the governing elite about barriers to coordination of the Iranian government web. The results show that these elite members have seven distinct conceptions about managing coordination in government which are based on how they perceive these barriers. The authors labeled these conceptions as: goal-orientation, unification-orientation, policy-orientation, reality-orientation, equilibrium-orientation, performance-orientation and architecture-orientation. The seven conceptions are examined in more details and are interpreted based on existing theories in the final section of this paper. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality & Quantity Springer Journals

The conceptions about managing coordination in Iranian governmental machinery: a Q methodology study

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-conceptions-about-managing-coordination-in-iranian-governmental-x4ApUQpDgs
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Social Sciences, general; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0033-5177
eISSN
1573-7845
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11135-012-9673-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Alignment among governmental organizations is one of the major national concerns in all political systems. The origin of this concern is the weakness of “horizontal management” which refers to horizontal coordination among all organization that exercise national governance. One of the important influences on horizontal management is the attitudes and perceptions of governing elites. This paper focuses on perceptions of barriers to coordination in government among public administrators, programming elites, politicians and academics involved in the government system. The authors use the inductive research technique Q-methodology, which is a research method used to study people’s “subjectivity”, to investigate the views of of 50 members of the governing elite about barriers to coordination of the Iranian government web. The results show that these elite members have seven distinct conceptions about managing coordination in government which are based on how they perceive these barriers. The authors labeled these conceptions as: goal-orientation, unification-orientation, policy-orientation, reality-orientation, equilibrium-orientation, performance-orientation and architecture-orientation. The seven conceptions are examined in more details and are interpreted based on existing theories in the final section of this paper.

Journal

Quality & QuantitySpringer Journals

Published: Jan 17, 2012

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off