Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The classification of wetlands: integration of top-down and bottom-up approaches and their significance for ecosystem service determination

The classification of wetlands: integration of top-down and bottom-up approaches and their... The typology of wetlands provides important information for both water resource managers and conservation planners. One of the most important aims of allocating wetlands to a certain type or class is to provide information about the ecosystem services that the wetland provides. There are two main approaches towards wetland classification. Firstly, there are top-down approaches whereby wetlands are divided into several categories based on a conceptual understanding of how the wetland functions (mostly with regards to water flows). Secondly there are bottom-up approaches whereby the classification of wetlands is based on the collection of data in the wetland that is then subjected to various clustering techniques (mostly with regards to biodiversity). The most utilized system of top-down classification assigns wetlands into hydrogeomorphic units, which function as a single unit in terms of hydrology and geomorphology. This type of classification is most useful for water resource planning, as it provides information about how the wetland is connected to the drainage network and what are the water inflows, throughflows and outflows of the wetland. The bottom-up classification approach typically focusses on the classification of wetland habitats rather than complete wetlands, where wetland habitat represents a spatial unit delineated on the basis of vegetation, embedded within the (complete) hydrogeomorphic unit, and defined as an area of wetland that is homogeneous in terms of opportunities for plant growth. At a broad scale, most ecosystem services can be superficially derived from the hydrogeomorphic unit type and the way water moves through a wetland, but habitat units and the plant species that define them would have a specific effect on the delivery of ecosystem services, for example, with different assemblages providing different resistance to flow. Some types of ecosystem services are exclusively linked to specific wetland habitats, especially provisioning services. For this reason, it is proposed that a combined approach of hydrogeomorphic classification together with a vegetation map, offers the maximum information value for ecosystem service determination. In order to account for the potential pitfall of “double counting” when combining the top-down and bottom-up approaches, each service needs to be considered individually with reference to the degree to which a service is either: (a) primarily determined by HGM class/attributes and modified by the vegetation class/attributes; or (b) primarily determined by the vegetation class/attributes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Wetlands Ecology and Management Springer Journals

The classification of wetlands: integration of top-down and bottom-up approaches and their significance for ecosystem service determination

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-classification-of-wetlands-integration-of-top-down-and-bottom-up-0u1MZ7grN3
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
Subject
Life Sciences; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Conservation Biology/Ecology; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice; Marine & Freshwater Sciences; Hydrology/Water Resources; Water Quality/Water Pollution
ISSN
0923-4861
eISSN
1572-9834
DOI
10.1007/s11273-017-9585-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The typology of wetlands provides important information for both water resource managers and conservation planners. One of the most important aims of allocating wetlands to a certain type or class is to provide information about the ecosystem services that the wetland provides. There are two main approaches towards wetland classification. Firstly, there are top-down approaches whereby wetlands are divided into several categories based on a conceptual understanding of how the wetland functions (mostly with regards to water flows). Secondly there are bottom-up approaches whereby the classification of wetlands is based on the collection of data in the wetland that is then subjected to various clustering techniques (mostly with regards to biodiversity). The most utilized system of top-down classification assigns wetlands into hydrogeomorphic units, which function as a single unit in terms of hydrology and geomorphology. This type of classification is most useful for water resource planning, as it provides information about how the wetland is connected to the drainage network and what are the water inflows, throughflows and outflows of the wetland. The bottom-up classification approach typically focusses on the classification of wetland habitats rather than complete wetlands, where wetland habitat represents a spatial unit delineated on the basis of vegetation, embedded within the (complete) hydrogeomorphic unit, and defined as an area of wetland that is homogeneous in terms of opportunities for plant growth. At a broad scale, most ecosystem services can be superficially derived from the hydrogeomorphic unit type and the way water moves through a wetland, but habitat units and the plant species that define them would have a specific effect on the delivery of ecosystem services, for example, with different assemblages providing different resistance to flow. Some types of ecosystem services are exclusively linked to specific wetland habitats, especially provisioning services. For this reason, it is proposed that a combined approach of hydrogeomorphic classification together with a vegetation map, offers the maximum information value for ecosystem service determination. In order to account for the potential pitfall of “double counting” when combining the top-down and bottom-up approaches, each service needs to be considered individually with reference to the degree to which a service is either: (a) primarily determined by HGM class/attributes and modified by the vegetation class/attributes; or (b) primarily determined by the vegetation class/attributes.

Journal

Wetlands Ecology and Management – Springer Journals

Published: Nov 30, 2017

References

  • Spectral discrimination of papyrus vegetation (Cyperus papyrus L.) in swamp wetlands using field spectrometry
    Adam, E; Mutanga, O
  • Guidebook for hydrogeomorphic (HGM)-based assessment of Oregon wetland and riparian sites: statewide classification and profiles
    Adamus, PR
  • The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation
    Brinson, MM; Rheinhardt, R
  • The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle
    Bullock, A; Acreman, M
  • The changing global carbon cycle: linking plant soil carbon dynamics to global consequences
    Chapin, FS; McFarland, J; McGuire, AD; Euskirchen, ES; Ruess, RW; Kielland, K
  • Scaling up in ecology: mechanistic approaches
    Denny, M; Benedetti-Cecchi, L
  • Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes
    Díaz, S; Cabido, M
  • Classification system for the South African wetland inventory, Second Draft, June 2000
    Dini, JA; Cowan, GI
  • Wetland classification and inventory: a summary
    Finlayson, CM; Valk, AG
  • The vegetation of seasonally flooded areas of the Pongolo River Floodplain
    Furness, HD; Breen, CM
  • Records of pan (floodplain wetland) sedimentation as an approach for post hoc investigation of the hydrological impacts of dam impoundment: the Pongolo river, KwaZulu-Natal
    Heath, SK; Plater, AJ
  • Cumulative impacts on water quality functions of wetlands
    Hemond, HF; Benoit, J
  • A framework for understanding physical ecosystem engineering by organisms
    Jones, CG; Guttierez, JL; Byers, JE; Crooks, JA; Lambrinos, JG; Talley, TS
  • Wetland ecology. Principles and conservation
    Keddy, PA
  • Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach
    Kent, M
  • Wetland plant Species used for craft production in KwaZulu–Natal, South Africa: ethnobotanical knowledge and environmental sustainability
    Kotze, DC; Traynor, CH
  • Wetlands of South Africa
    Kotze, DC; Breen, CM; Quinn, N
  • Improved criteria for classifying hydric soils in South Africa
    Kotze, DC; Hughes, JC; Klug, JR; Breen, CM
  • A rapid assessment method for coupling anthropogenic stressors and wetland ecological condition
    Kotze, DC; Ellery, WN; Macfarlane, DM; Jewitt, GPW
  • Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail
    Lavorel, S; Garnier, E
  • Numerical ecology
    Legendre, P; Legendre, L
  • Wetlands
    Mitsch, WJ; Gosselink, JG
  • Predicting climate change effects on wetland ecosystem services using species distribution and plant functional traits
    Moor, H; Hylander, K; Norberg, J
  • Towards a trait-based ecology of wetland vegetation
    Moor, H; Rydin, H; Hylander, K; Nilsson, M; Lindborg, R; Norberg, J
  • The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland
    Mucina, L; Rutherford, MC
  • Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective
  • Plant traits relevant to fluvial geomorphology and hydrological interactions
    O’Hare, MT; Mountford, JO; Maroto, J; Gunn, IDM
  • The development of a classification system for inland aquatic ecosystems in South Africa
    Ollis, DJ; Ewart-Smith, JL; Day, JA; Job, NM; Macfarlane, DM; Snaddon, CD; Sieben, EJJ; Dini, JA; Mbona, N
  • Rivers for life: managing water for people and nature
    Postel, S; Richter, B
  • A review of wetland inventory and classification in Australia
    Pressey, RL; Adam, P
  • River and wetland classifications for freshwater conservation planning in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Rivers-Moore, NA; Goodman, PS
  • Scale-based freshwater conservation planning: towards protecting freshwater biodiversity in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Rivers-Moore, NA; Goodman, PS; Nel, JL
  • Mapping plant strategy types using remote sensing
    Schmidtlein, S; Feilhauer, H; Bruelheide, H
  • Classification and inventory of wetlands: a global overview
    Scott, DA; Jones, TA
  • A geomorphic approach to global classification for inland wetlands
    Semeniuk, CA; Semeniuk, V
  • Plant functional composition and ecosystem properties: the case of peatlands in South Africa
    Sieben, EJJ
  • Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) approach to assessing wetland functions: guidelines for developing guidebooks (Version 2)
    Smith, RD; Noble, CV; Berkowitz, JF
  • Distribution of clonal growth forms in wetlands
    Sosnová, M; Diggelen, R; Klimešová, J
  • Different plant traits affect two pathways of riparian nitrogen removal in a restored freshwater wetland
    Sutton-Grier, AE; Wright, JP; Richardson, CJ
  • Wetland indicators: a guide to wetland identification, delineation, classification, and mapping
    Tiner, RW
  • Wetlands in drylands: geomorphological and sedimentological characteristics, with emphasis on examples from southern Africa
    Tooth, S; McCarthy, TS
  • Restoration ecology: the new frontier
    Andel, J; Aronson, J
  • Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundance
    Vile, D; Shipley, B; Garnier, E
  • Let the concept of trait be functional!
    Violle, C; Navas, M-L; Vile, D; Kazakou, E; Fortunel, C; Hummel, I; Garnier, E
  • Assessment of wetlands in the upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA using the hydrogeomorphic approach
    Wardrop, DH; Kentula, ME; Jensen, SF; Stevens, DL; Hychka, KC; Brooks, RP
  • Classification of plant communities
    Westhoff, V; Maarel, E
  • Data analysis in vegetation ecology
    Wildi, O
  • Which components of plant diversity are most correlated to ecosystem properties? A case study in a restored wetland in northern China
    Zhang, Y; Wang, R; Kaplan, D; Liu, J