Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Hafer, L. Bègue (2005)
Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges.Psychological bulletin, 131 1
S. Bell, P. Kuriloff, I. Lottes (1994)
Understanding Attributions of Blame in Stranger Rape and Date Rape Situations: An Examination of Gender, Race, Identification, and Students' Social Perceptions of Rape Victims1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24
R. Schuller, J. Ogloff (2001)
Introduction to Psychology and Law: Canadian Perspectives
Karla Stormo, A. Lang, W. Stritzke (1997)
Attributions About Acquaintance Rape: The Role of Alcohol and Individual Differences1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27
A. Furnham (2003)
Belief in a just world: research progress over the past decadePersonality and Individual Differences, 34
J. Spence, R. Helmreich, J. Stapp (1973)
A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS)Bulletin of the psychonomic society, 2
M. Alicke (2000)
Culpable control and the psychology of blame.Psychological bulletin, 126 4
L. Grimm, P. Yarnold (1995)
Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics
Janet Mantler, E. Schellenberg, J. Page (2003)
Attributions for serious illness: Are controllability, responsibility and blame different constructs?Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 35
D. Payne, K. Lonsway, L. Fitzgerald (1999)
Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale.Journal of Research in Personality, 33
M. Swigonski, R. Mama, K. Ward, AttnMatthew Shepard (2001)
From Hate Crimes to Human Rights: A Tribute to Matthew Shepard
Richard Bouton, Peggy Gallaher, Paul Garlinghouse, Terri Leal, Leslie Rosenstein, R. Young (1987)
Scales for measuring fear of AIDS and homophobia.Journal of personality assessment, 51 4
B. Wall (2000)
Criminal responsibility, diminished capacity, and the gay panic defense.The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28 4
Norma Gray, G. Palileo, G. Johnson (1993)
Explaining rape victim blame: A test of attribution theorySociological Spectrum, 13
J. T. Spence, R. Helmreich (1972)
The Attitudes toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary societyJournal Supplement Abstract Service, 2
Katherine Burczyk, L. Standing (1989)
Attitudes towards Rape Victims: Effects of Victim Status, Sex of Victim, and Sex of Rater.Social Behavior and Personality, 17
C. Batson, P. Lange, N. Ahmad, David Lishner (2003)
Altruism and helping behavior
W. Fisher, L. White, D. Byrne, K. Kelley (1988)
Erotophobia‐erotophilia as a dimension of personalityJournal of Sex Research, 25
W. Hudson, W. Ricketts (1980)
A strategy for the measurement of homophobia.Journal of homosexuality, 5 4
C. Brems, P. Wagner (1994)
Blame of victim and perpetrator in rape versus theft.The Journal of social psychology, 134 3
Kara Suffredini (2001)
Pride and Prejudice: The Homosexual Panic DefenseBoston College Third World law journal, 21
Mark Whatley, R. Riggio (1993)
Gender Differences in Attributions of Blame for Male Rape VictimsJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 8
C. Krull (1994)
Level of Education, Sexual Promiscuity, and AIDS.Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 40
J. T. Spence, R. Helmreich (1977)
Exploring contemporary male/female roles
B. Thompson (2000)
Ten commandments of structural equation modeling.
Z. Rubin, L. Peplau (1975)
Who believes in a just worldJournal of Social Issues, 31
W. A. Fisher (1998)
Handbook of sexuality-related measures
T. Ficarrotto (1990)
Racism, sexism, and erotophobia: attitudes of heterosexuals toward homosexuals.Journal of homosexuality, 19 1
S. D. McCoy (2000)
The homosexual-advance defense and hate crimes statutes: Their interaction and conflictCardozo Law Review, 22
C. Kleinke, C. Meyer (1990)
Evaluation of Rape Victim by Men and Women with High and Low Belief in A Just WorldPsychology of Women Quarterly, 14
Barbara Johnson, Douglas Kuck, Patricia Schander (1997)
Rape Myth Acceptance and Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Multidimensional AnalysisSex Roles, 36
Alyssa Bryant (2003)
Changes in Attitudes Toward Women's Roles: Predicting Gender-Role Traditionalism Among College StudentsSex Roles, 48
W. Msw (2001)
A Tribute to Matthew ShepardJournal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 13
M. Schneider (1988)
Often invisible: Counselling gay and lesbian youth
L. Grimm, P. Yarnold (2000)
Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics.
J. Warner, D. Boodell (2000)
American justice
T. M. Ford, M. G. Liwag-McLamb, L. A. Foley (1998)
Perceptions of rape based on sex and sexual orientation of victimJournal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13
M. Burt (1980)
Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of personality and social psychology, 38 2
T. Wild, K. Graham, J. Rehm (1998)
Blame and punishment for intoxicated aggression: when is the perpetrator culpable?Addiction, 93 5
K. Weinfurt (1995)
Multivariate analysis of variance.
A. Furnham, E. Procter (1989)
Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature.British Journal of Social Psychology, 28
S. Schwanberg (1993)
Attitudes towards gay men and lesbian women: instrumentation issues.Journal of homosexuality, 26 1
J. Aguero, L. Bloch, D. Byrne (1984)
The relationships among sexual beliefs, attitudes, experience, and homophobia.Journal of homosexuality, 10 1-2
J. Sharp, J. Hart, E. Kolodner, C. Vachon, K. Peirce, K. Peirce (1999)
Boys don’t cry [Motion Picture]
A. Vassal, J. Fisher, R. Jürgens, R. Hughes (1997)
Gay and lesbian issues and HIV/AIDS: A discussion paper
J. R. Schwendinger, H. Schwendinger (1974)
Rape myths: In legal, theoretical, and everyday practiceCrime and Social Justice, 1
G. Herek (2000)
The Psychology of Sexual PrejudiceCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 9
Margaret Judicibus, M. McCabe (2001)
Blaming the Target of Sexual Harassment: Impact of Gender Role, Sexist Attitudes, and Work RoleSex Roles, 44
This study was designed to investigate the effects of gender on attributions of blame, responsibility, and recommended sentencing in a sexualized crime scenario with a 2 (perpetrator gender) by 2 (victim gender) by 2 (participant gender) between-subjects design. There was an interaction of gender of perpetrator and gender of victim such that female victims were held less responsible and their perpetrators were judged more harshly, especially when the perpetrator was male. Male victims were held the most responsible, especially when the perpetrator was male. Individual difference analyses indicated that attitude toward sexual minorities was the best predictor of judgments. Belief in a just world was not predictive of dependent measures. Attributions of blame and perceived defense adequacy were predictors of assigned penalty.
Sex Roles – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 19, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.