www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The anti-cholesterolaemic effect of a consortium of probiotics: An acute study in C57BL/6J mice Received: 24 January 2017 1 1 2 1 2 D. R. Michael , T. S. Davies , J. W. E. Moss , D. Lama Calvente , D. P. Ramji , 2,3 5 1 4 Accepted: 19 April 2017 J. R. Marchesi , A. Pechlivanis , S. F. Plummer & T. R. Hughes Published: xx xx xxxx Hypercholesterolaemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and it has been found that some probiotic bacteria possess cholesterol-lowering capabilities. In this study, the ability of the Lab4 probiotic consortium to hydrolyse bile salts, assimilate cholesterol and regulate cholesterol transport by polarised Caco-2 enterocytes was demonstrated. Furthermore, in wild-type C57BL/6J mice fed a high fat diet, 2-weeks supplementation with Lab4 probiotic consortium plus Lactobacillus plantarum CUL66 resulted in significant reductions in plasma total cholesterol levels and suppression of diet-induced weight gain. No changes in plasma levels of very low-density lipoprotein/low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, cytokines or bile acids were observed. Increased amounts of total and unconjugated bile acids in the faeces of the probiotic-fed mice, together with modulation of hepatic small heterodimer partner and cholesterol-7α-hydroxylase mRNA expression, implicates bile salt hydrolase activity as a potential mechanism of action. In summary, this study demonstrates the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of short-term feeding of the Lab4 probiotic consortium plus L. plantarum CUL66 in wild-type mice and supports further assessment in human trials. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the cause of death in one in three people in the United Kingdom and is the leading cause of global mortality . Hypercholesterolaemia is a major risk factor for the disease and statins are widely used to normalise elevated circulating cholesterol levels and can reduce CVD-related events by approx- 3–7 8 imately 25% and are oen a ft ssociated with adverse side effects . Primary and secondary care of CVD imparts a heavy economic burden on society . Management of modifiable lifestyle risk factors, such as diet, body weight 7, 9 and physical activity, represent preventative measures and are advocated by healthcare providers . However, the high mortality rates associated with CVD suggest these measures are not sufficiently effective and further options 10–12 are required . Probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health 13, 14 benefit on the host” and there is growing evidence that some probiotic organisms possess a cholesterol lower- ing capability and could be considered as a potential supplemental tool in combatting CVD and associated con- 15 16–21 ditions . e c Th holesterol-lowering efficacy of a diversity of microbial species and strains has been observed . There are multiple mechanisms by which these effects are thought to occur including the assimilation of cho- lesterol and/or the deconjugation of bile salts by bile salt hydrolase (BSH) positive probiotic bacteria that put 23, 24 increased demand on de novo bile synthesis (from circulating cholesterol) to replace that which is lost in faeces . Probiotic bacteria have also been shown to modulate key intestinal cholesterol transport pathways by regulating gene expression patterns of Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1), ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 25–29 (ABCG)-5, ABCG-8 or ATP-binding cassette transporter-1 (ABCA-1) in intestinal epithelial cells . L. plantarum CUL66 (NCIMB 30280) has been found to have a cholesterol-lowering capability and the effects of the Lab4 consortium of probiotics (Lab4, composed of Lactobacillus acidophilus CUL21 (NCIMB 30156) and CUL60 (NCIMB 30157), Bifidobacterium bifidum CUL20 (NCIMB 30153) and Bifidobacterium Cultech Limited, Unit 2 Christchurch Road, Baglan Industrial Park, Port Talbot, SA12 7BZ, United Kingdom. Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF14 3AX, United Kingdom. Centre for Digestive and Gut Health, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Division of Infection and Immunity, Henry Wellcome Building, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Division of Computational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, London, United Kingdom. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.R.M. (email: firstname.lastname@example.org) Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 1. BSH activity and cholesterol assimilation by Lab4. (a) De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar plates (control, top and bottom left-sided panels) or MRS agar plates containing 0.05% taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA, top and bottom right-sided panels) that were inoculated with Lab4 on filter discs (top panels) or as bacterial streaks (bottom panels, n = 1) for 48 hours under anaerobic conditions. (b) Cholesterol concentration in MRS broth containing 0.3% (w/v) ox-bile and 200 µg/ml cholesterol (control) or in MRS broth containing 0.3% (w/v) ox-bile and 200 µg/ml cholesterol that were inoculated with Lab4 for 18 hours under anaerobic conditions. e d Th ata are presented as a representative image from 3 identical experiments (unless stated, Fig. 1a) or the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (Fig. 1b). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t- test and values of p are stated where appropriate. 30–33 animalis subsp. lactis CUL34 (NCIMB 30172) during other conditions are documented . In the present study, assessment of the cholesterol lowering capabilities of Lab4 was made in vitro prior to its inclusion, in combination with L. plantarum CUL66, in a short-term feeding study with C57BL/6J mice on a high fat diet. Results Evidence for cholesterol lowering ability by Lab4 in vitro. BSH activity in Lab4 was indicated by the formation of a white precipitate and agar-clouding in the presence of 0.5% TDCA (Fig. 1a; right-sided panels) that was absent on control agar (Fig. 1a; left-sided panels). Growing cultures of Lab4 removed 26.54% (p = 0.076) of cholesterol from MRS broth (Fig. 1b) equating to 4.84 ± 5.27 mg of cholesterol per gram of dry weight bacteria. As seen in Fig. 2a, when incubated with 21-day polarised Caco-2 cells and cholesterol (70 µ g/ml), live cultures of Lab4 reduced NPC1L1 and ABCA-1 gene expression by 33% (p = 0.00002) and 37% (p = 0.001) respectively and increased 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) gene expression by 35% (p = 0.012) when compared to cells treated with cholesterol alone (Control). No significant changes in ABCG-5 or ABCG-8 gene expression were observed. The viability of both Caco-2 cells and Lab4 was maintained throughout the experiment (Supplementary Figure S1). No substantial changes in the uptake of extracellular radiolabelled cholesterol were observed in response to Lab4 (Fig. 2b) despite reduced expression of NPC1L1 (Fig. 2a) and the ability of Lab4 to assimilate cholesterol (Fig. 1b). Reduced gene expression of ABCA-1 (Fig. 2a) was also observed in response to Lab4 Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 2 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 2. e eff Th ect of Lab4 on cholesterol homeostasis in Caco-2 enterocytes. (a) Gene transcript levels of NPC1L1, ABCG-5, ABCG-8, ABCA-1 and HMGCR in Caco-2 cells that were treated with 70 µg/ml cholesterol (Control) or cholesterol (70 µg/ml) and Lab4 (1 × 10 cfu/ml) for 6 hours. Gene transcript levels were calculated using the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method and normalised to β-actin levels with the control given an arbitrary value of 1.0. (b) Cholesterol uptake by untreated (control) Caco-2 cells or those incubated with Lab4 (1 × 10 cfu/ml) for 5 hours prior to the addition of radiolabelled cholesterol for an additional hour. Intracellular radioactivity (disintegrations per minute) was normalised to total protein content and presented as a percentage of the control that has been arbitrarily assigned as 100%. Efflux of intracellular radiolabelled cholesterol to apolipoprotein-AI (Apo-AI, 10 μg/ml) in the basolateral compartment (c) or TDCA micelles (1 nM) in the apical compartment (d) by untreated (control) Caco-2 cells or those treated with Lab4 (1 × 10 cfu/ml) for 6 hours. The percentage of intracellular cholesterol effluxed from the cells was determined by dividing the radioactivity of the apical media or basolateral media by the combined radioactivity in the apical media, basolateral media and cell fraction. The data are presented as the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. suggesting a possible impact on cholesterol transport. As seen in Fig. 2c, the apical application of viable Lab4 cultures to Caco-2 cells housed in a dual compartment trans-well system significantly reduced the basolateral efflux of intracellular radiolabelled cholesterol compared to the control (35%, p = 0.004). The magnitude of this reduction is in line with the 37% reduction in ABCA-1 gene expression (Fig. 2a). No changes in the efflux of intracellular radiolabelled cholesterol into the extracellular apical compartment were observed (Fig. 2d). Short-term feeding of mice with Lab4 and L. plantarum CUL66 reduces plasma total choles - terol (TC) and diet-induced weight gain but has no effect on plasma very low-density lipo - protein (VLDL)/low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides (TG) or cytokines. As expected, mice in the high fat diet (HFD) group presented elevated plasma levels of TC (2.89 mM vs 3.64 mM, p = 0.001), VLDL/LDL (0.41 mM vs 0.79 mM, p = 0.000003) and HDL (1.73 mM vs 2.04 mM, p = 0.054) compared to baseline (BL) values although TG levels remained unchanged (Table 1). Between group comparison showed that plasma TC was significantly reduced by 14% (3.64 mM vs 3.15 mM, p = 0.029) in the high fat diet plus probiotic (HFD + P) group compared to the HFD group to a level similar to BL levels. Plasma cytokines were not changed in response to the high fat diet (BL vs HFD) or probiotic feeding (HFD Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 3 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ BL HFD HFD + P Plasma Lipids (mM) Total cholesterol 2.89 ± 0.09 3.64 ± 0.33** 3.15 ± 0.38 Very low-density lipoprotein/low- 0.41 ± 0.10 0.79 ± 0.07*** 0.69 ± 0.09*** density lipoprotein p=0.054 High-density lipoprotein 1.73 ± 0.14 2.04 ± 0.23 1.79 ± 0.26 Triglycerides 0.76 ± 0.14 0.80 ± 0.15 0.71 ± 0.12 Plasma Cytokines (pg/ml) Interferon-γ 0.59 ± 0.26 0.61 ± 0.39 0.97 ± 0.41 Interleukin-10 14.23 ± 4.26 12.83 ± 2.56 15.18 ± 3.83 Interleukin-12p70 51.11 ± 54.01 30.05 ± 32.06 19.80 ± 12.17 Interleukin-1β 0.84 ± 0.59 0.74 ± 0.49 0.60 ± 0.24 Interleukin-2 3.24 ± 1.46 2.84 ± 1.41 2.14 ± 0.60 Interleukin-4 0.72 ± 0.57 0.43 ± 0.37 0.37 ± 0.13 Interleukin-5 2.95 ± 0.64 3.14 ± 1.20 3.18 ± 0.34 Interleukin-6 6.37 ± 2.13 10.22 ± 8.47 10.39 ± 3.80 Keratinocyte chemoattractant/growth- 63.19 ± 15.62 75.36 ± 14.15 89.62 ± 21.26* regulated oncogene Tumor Necrosis Factor-α 10.7 1 ± 1.27 11.47 ± 2.59 15.34 ± 5.16 Table 1. Plasma lipid and cytokine concentrations. Data represent the means ± standard deviation of 6 mice per group. Values of p were determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s (equal variance) or Dunnett’s T3 ∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ # (unequal variance) post-hoc analysis where p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 versus the BL group; p < 0.05 versus the HFD group. Values of p compared to the BL group are stated where appropriate. Figure 3. Effect of probiotics on body weight. Body weights of mice in the HFD and HFD + P groups were recorded throughout the intervention period at the indicated time points and the percentage change in body weight since day 0 was calculated for each mouse. Data is presented as the mean ± SD for 6 mice in each group. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test where *p < 0.05. vs HFD + P) although significantly elevated levels of keratinocyte chemoattractant/growth-regulated oncogene were observed in the HFD + P group compared to BL levels (63.19 pg/ml vs 89.62 pg/ml, 42%, p = 0.045). Mice in the HFD + P group showed significantly less weight gain after 14 days feeding compared to the HFD group (10.92% vs 15.33% respectively, p = 0.025, Fig. 3). No residual food was found during daily cage checks. Short-term feeding with Lab4 plus L. plantarum CUL66 has no effect on plasma bile acids, but increases faecal bile acid excretion. Analysis of bile acids did not identify any differences between groups in the levels present in the plasma (Fig. 4a and b). In contrast, mice fed HFD and HFD + P have differ - ent faecal bile acid profiles to the BL group (Fig. 4c and d) and the faecal bile acid profile of HFD + P fed mice is more variable than those fed HFD alone (Fig. 4c). Plasma and faecal bile acid profiles (as relative intensities from UPLC-MS) are shown in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S2. Unlike plasma levels that remained unchanged, total and unconjugated bile acid levels were significantly increased in the faeces of both groups during the study compared to BL and significantly higher levels of total (34% increase, p = 0.047) and unconjugated bile acids (33% increase, p = 0.047) were present in the faeces of HFD + P mice compared to the HFD group (Table 2). Increased relative levels of ursodeoxycholic acid (46% increase, p = 0.003), hyodeoxycholic acid (96% increase, p = 0.028), taurochenodeoxycholic acid (180% increase, p = 0.026) and a trend towards an increase in deoxycholic/chenodeoxycholic acid (30%, p = 0.052) were observed in the faeces of HFD + P mice compared to the HFD group (Table 2). Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 4 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 4. Principle component analysis (PCA) and heatmap analysis of plasma and faecal bile acid profiles. PCA score plots of bile acid signatures from the (a) plasma or (c) faeces of BL, HFD and HFD + P mice. Heatmaps of the bile acid relative intensity from (b) plasma or (d) faeces of each mouse. Short-term feeding with Lab4 plus L. plantarum CUL66 modulates the expression of genes associated with hepatic bile metabolism, but has no effect on those associated with cholesterol metabolism/transport in the duodenum, colon or liver. Significantly reduced mRNA levels of small heterodimer partner (SHP, 42%, p = 0.010) and significantly elevated mRNA levels of cholesterol-7α -hydroxylase (CYP7A1, 84%, p = 0.047) were observed in the livers of the HFD + P mice when compared to those fed HFD alone (Table 3). A trend towards an increase in hepatic ABCG-8 mRNA (23%, p = 0.067) was observed in HFD + P when compared to those fed HFD alone (Table 3). No significant differences between groups in the expression of farnesoid X receptor (FXR), NPC1L1, ABCG-5, ABCG-8, ABCA-1 and HMGCR were observed in duodenal, colonic or liver tissues (Table 3). Fibroblast growth factor 15 (FGF15) mRNA could not be detected in the duodenum or colon (Table 3). Discussion In this short-term feeding study, daily probiotic supplementation resulted in lower plasma cholesterol levels and suppression of diet-induced weight gain in mice fed a high fat diet. High circulating levels of TC and obesity are associated with increased risk of CVD and reductions in cholesterol levels and body weight can have a beneficial impact on this disease . The cholesterol-lowering and anti-obesity ee ff cts observed for Lab4 plus L. plantarum 34–40 CUL66 support the findings of longer term feeding studies in C57BL/6J mice with other probiotics and fur- ther implicate probiotic supplementation as a potential strategy for the prevention of metabolic disease. The deconjugation of bile acids by bacterial BSH activity is considered a key probiotic cholesterol-lowering 22, 26, 41–44 35, 45 mechanism and can increase faecal bile acid excretion in C57BL/6J mice by repressing the entero- 45 35, 45 hepatic FXR-FGF15 axis and increasing hepatic bile acid synthesis . In this study, we propose that reduced plasma cholesterol levels (Table 1) are the consequence of increased bile synthesis de novo by the host in response to probiotic-mediated bile acid deconjugation in the intestines. This view is supported by numerous obseva- tions: firstly, the ability of Lab4 (Fig. 1a) and L. plantarum CUL66 to deconjugate bile acids in vitro. Secondly, increased levels of total and unconjugated bile acids in the faeces of probiotic fed mice (Table 2). Thirdly, a reduction in hepatic gene expression of SHP; a transcriptional repressor of CYP7A1; the rate limiting enzyme in the synthesis of bile salts from cholesterol . Finally, the concomitant increase in hepatic mRNA CYP7A1 levels (Table 3) that has consistently shown direct correlation with increased hepatic CYP7A1 protein levels in Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 5 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ PLASMA FAECES HFD HFD + P HFD HFD + P Total bile acids 1.39 ± 0.56 1.07 ± 1.20 1.72 ± 0.34* 2.30 ± 0.49*** Conjugated bile acids 1.56 ± 1.13 0.90 ± 0.57 2.07 ± 1.21 3.62 ± 2.96* Unconjugated bile acids 1.35 ± 0.48 1.11 ± 1.46 1.71 ± 0.33* 2.27 ± 0.46*** Individual bile acids Ursocholanic Acid ND ND 1.16 ± 0.44 1.32 ± 0.47 3-Ketocholanic Acid ND ND 1.12 ± 0.51 1.39 ± 0.70 Lithocholic acid ND ND 1.11 ± 0.33 1.25 ± 0.46 Allolithocholic Acid ND ND 1.38 ± 0.65 1.98 ± 1.08 Isolithocholic Acid ND ND 1.11 ± 0.55 1.22 ± 0.55 3,6/12-Diketocholanic Acid ND ND 0.94 ± 0.80 1.58 ± 1.04 3α-Hydroxy-12 Ketolithocholic Acid ND ND 1.74 ± 0.61 2.47 ± 0.87* p=0.052 Deoxycholic Acid/Chenodeoxycholic ND ND 1.29 ± 0.17 1.68 ± 0.28* 5β-Cholanic Acid-3β, 12α-diol ND ND 0.94 ± 0.23 1.17 ± 0.37 Murocholic Acid ND ND 3.07 ± 1.77** 4.83 ± 2.54*** ## Ursodeoxycholic acid ND ND 1.58 ± 0.11* 2.31 ± 0.36** Hyodeoxycholic acid ND ND 2.26 ± 0.91** 4.42 ± 1.91*** 12-Dehydrocholic Acid 0.59 ± 0.27 0.59 ± 0.78 2.41 ± 1.09* 2.58 ± 1.29* ω-Muricholic Acid 0.93 ± 0.32 0.59 ± 0.77 1.87 ± 0.39** 2.22 ± 0.46** α/β-Muricholic acid 2.41 ± 0.99 1.94 ± 2.49 2.98 ± 1.19*** 4.28 ± 1.29*** Hyocholic acid ND ND 1.20 ± 0.38 1.67 ± 0.43 Cholic acid 1.49 ± 0.63 1.35 ± 1.82 17.00 ± 16.70 18.82 ± 15.33*** Taurochenodeoxycholic Acid 9.18 ± 9.09* 4.36 ± 3.04 2.99 ± 1.32* 8.40 ± 5.75*** Taurodeoxycholic Acid 1.08 ± 0.88 0.86 ± 0.53 6.12 ± 4.21** 13.75 ± 13.81*** Tauro-ursodeoxycholic Acid 1.50 ± 0.26 1.16 ± 0.66 3.88 ± 2.51* 6.25 ± 4.50** Taurohyodeoxycholic Acid ND ND 2.73 ± 1.50* 7.25 ± 5.46** Taurocholic Acid 0.88 ± 0.82 0.50 ± 0.43 0.60 ± 0.22 1.29 ± 1.08 Tauro-ω,α,β Muricholic Acid 1.99 ± 1.27 1.04 ± 0.62 2.70 ± 1.76 3.64 ± 2.64** Table 2. Ratio of plasma and faecal bile acid content in relation to BL group. Data represent the means ± SD of 4 (plasma) or 6 (faeces) mice per group. Values of p were determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s ∗ ∗∗ (equal variance) or Dunnett’s T3 (unequal variance) post-hoc analysis where p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ # ## ### p < 0.001 versus the BL group; p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 versus the HFD group. Values of p compared to the HFD group are stated where appropriate. ND, not detected. DUODENUM COLON LIVER FXR 1.26 ± 1.20 1.78 ± 1.09 1.27 ± 0.25 FGF15 ND ND NT SHP NT NT 0.58 ± 0.18* CYP7A1 NT NT 1.84 ± 0.69* HMGCR 0.87 ± 0.72 2.16 ± 1.56 0.95 ± 0.19 NPC1L1 0.91 ± 0.56 0.89 ± 0.61 1.37 ± 0.35 ABCG5 1.14 ± 0.31 0.92 ± 0.68 1.03 ± 0.17 p=0.067 ABCG8 1.00 ± 1.20 0.78 ± 0.47 1.23 ± 0.20 ABCA1 0.60 ± 0.66 0.75 ± 0.55 0.96 ± 0.31 Table 3. Ratio of expression of key genes involved in bile acid and cholesterol metabolism in the HFD+P group in relation to the HFD group. Data represent the means ± SD of 6 mice per group values of p were determined using Student’s t-test where p < 0.05. Values of p compared to the HFD group are stated where appropriate. NT, not tested; ND, not detected. 47–49 numerous other studies . It should also be noted that these changes were not accompanied with changes in plasma bile acids (Table 2) or intestinal FXR mRNA expression (Table 3) in accordance with observations made 45 50, 51 elsewhere , although gene expression levels in the ileum; the key site of FXR-FGF15 activation , were not assessed in our study due to non-availability of tissue. Probiotics have also been shown to lower cholesterol levels by regulating cholesterol transport and metabo- 25–27, 29 29 lism and both Lab4 (Fig. 2a) and L. plantarum CUL66 have been shown to inhibit the expression of the cholesterol uptake transporter NPC1L1 in human intestinal epithelial cells. For L. plantarum CUL66, decreased Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 6 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ expression was associated with decreased extracellular cholesterol uptake together with increased expression of apical cholesterol efflux proteins ABCG-5 and ABCG-8 , but was not associated with any changes in cholesterol export into the apical compartment . Lab4 and L. plantarum CUL66 have been shown to reduce the expression of the cholesterol efflux transporter ABCA-1 which may be linked to the observed reductions of ApoAI-mediated basolateral cholesterol efflux (Fig. 2c) . Interestingly, transcript levels of the de novo cholesterol synthesis enzyme HMGCR were increased and this change could represent a compensatory mechanism used to maintain cellu- 29, 52–54 lar cholesterol levels . The changes in gene expression that had been observed in cultured human Caco-2 enterocytes in vitro may represent a species-specific effect as similar changes were not detected in the duodenal or colonic tissue analysed on completion of the murine feeding study (Table 3). Assimilation of cholesterol is thought to be another mechanism by which probiotic bacteria can influence 55 29 plasma cholesterol levels although the impact of cholesterol assimilation by Lab4 (Fig. 1b) and L. plantarum seen in vitro could not be assessed in vivo due a limited availability of faecal sample. Likewise, it was not possible to assess the impact of other potential probiotic cholesterol-lowering mechanisms such as the conversion of cho- 55 56, 57 lesterol to coprostanol, short chain fatty acid production and the assimilation of bile acids . Probiotics have 37, 38 34, 40 also been shown to reduce blood TG levels or impart anti-inflammatory effects in HFD fed C57BL/6J mice but these responses were not seen in our study (Table 1) possibly as a result of the short intervention period. In summary, this preliminary 2 week study in mice on a high fat diet demonstrated the cholesterol-lowering capability of a combination of Lab4 and L. plantarum CUL66 probiotic bacteria. The probiotic group presented lower plasma TC levels and reduced weight gain together with changes in faecal bile acid content which impli- cates the deconjugation of bile salts as a potential mechanism of action. These findings provide a meaningful basis for the design of follow-up studies to assess cholesterol lowering efficacy of these probiotic bacteria in humans. Methods Reagents. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poole, UK) unless otherwise stated. Studies in vitro. Lab4 was assessed for its ability to deconjugate bile salts, assimilate cholesterol and reg- ulate Caco-2 cell cholesterol transport as previously described . Overnight cultures of Lab4 grown in MRS broth (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) were centrifuged (1,000 × g, 10 min), washed with phosphate buffered saline and re-suspended to 1 × 10 cfu/ml in antibiotic free Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 4.5 g/l glucose, 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids and 10 mM HEPES. Studies in vivo. Maintenance of animals and feeding of probiotics. Eighteen 8-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were obtained from Harlan Laboratories (Oxfordshire, UK) and housed in pathogen-free scantainer venti- lated cages (3 mice per cage) in a light- and temperature-controlled facility (lights on 7 a.m. −7 p.m., 22 °C). Aer ft one week acclimatisation on standard chow diet, 6 mice were sacrificed for baseline analysis and the remaining 12 mice were randomly assigned into 2 groups; one group on high fat diet containing 21% (w/w) pork lard supple- mented with 0.15% (w/w) cholesterol (Special Diets Services, Witham, U.K; product code: 821424) and the other on high fat diet supplemented with 5 × 10 cfu/mouse/day of Lab4 plus L. plantarum CUL66. The mice were fed 10 g/cage/day (44.50 kcal/cage/day) for 14 days and cages were checked daily for surplus food. Body weights were recorded throughout the feeding period and faecal samples collected at the beginning and end of the study and were stored under anaerobic conditions at −80 °C for further analysis. At the end of the feeding period, all mice were terminally exsanguinated under anaesthesia by cardiac puncture and death confirmed by cervical disloca- tion. All studies and protocols were approved by the Cardiff University institutional ethics review committee and the United Kingdom Home Office and experiments were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 85–23, revised 1996). Blood and tissue sampling. Blood obtained from cardiac puncture was collected into EDTA (10 mM final con- centration) and the plasma separated by centrifugation (12,000 × g, 5 mins). Liver and intestinal tissue was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. All samples were stored at −80 °C. Plasma lipid and cytokine analysis. TC, HDL and TG concentrations were measured at the Clinical Biochemistry Service, Cardiff University, on an Aeroset automated analyzer (Abbott Diagnostics, Berkshire, UK). Plasma VLDL/LDL concentrations were measured using the VLDL/LDL cholesterol assay kit (ABCAM, Cambridge, UK) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasma cytokine concentrations were measured by the Central Biotechnology Service (Cardiff University, UK) using the VPLEX pro-inflammatory panel 1 mouse kit (Meso Scale Discovery, Maryland, USA). UPLC-MS profiling of plasma and faecal bile acids. Plasma samples were prepared for analysis using a previ- ously described method . Faecal pellets were lyophilised for 48 hours using a VirTis Benchtop BTP 8ZL freeze dryer (BPS FUK). The dried pellets were weighed and then homogenised in a mixture of water, acetonitrile and 2-propanol (2:1:1 vol.) using a Biospec bead beater with 1.0 mm Zirconia beads to extract bile acids. Aer ft centrifu- gation (16,000 × g, 20 mins) the supernatant was passed through 0.45 μm microcentrifuge filters (Costar, Corning). Equal parts of the plasma and faecal l fi trates were used for the preparation of quality control (QC) samples that are required to monitor the stability of the assay. QC samples were also spiked with mixtures of bile acid standards (55 bile acid standards including 36 non-conjugated, 12 conjugated with taurine, 7 conjugated with glycine (Steraloids, Newport, RI)) to determine the chromatographic retention times of bile acids. The filtrate was transferred in LCMS vials and used for the subsequent analysis. Plasma and faecal bile acid analysis was performed by ACQUITY UPLC (Waters Ltd, Elstree, UK) coupled to a Xevo G2 Q-ToF mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ioni- zation source operating in negative ion mode (ESI-), using the method described by Sarafian et al . . Waters raw Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 7 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ data files were converted to NetCDF format and data were extracted via XCMS (v1.50) package with R (v3.1.1) sowa ft re. MassLynx sowa ft re 4.1 was used respectively for data acquisition and validation for this high throughput semi-targeted method for relative quantification of bile acids. Relative faecal bile acid intensities were corrected to the faecal pellet dry weight. PCA was carried out on the integrated mass spectrometric data using pareto scaling and logarithmic transformation using SIMCA v184.108.40.2067 (MKS Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden). The heatmaps were generated in R using package NMF using the scale command for the columns to create Z-scores. Gene expression analysis. Approximately 50 mg of liver or intestinal scrapings were transferred into prefilled Lysis Matrix D micro-centrifuge tubes (MP Biomedicals, UK) containing 500 µl of Ribozol (Amresco LLC, Ohio, TM USA). The tissue was homogenized for 60 seconds at 6.0 m/s on a Fastprep-24 homogenizer (MP Biomedicals, UK) and total RNA was isolated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Ribozol, Amresco LLC, Ohio, USA). Total RNA (1 µ g) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the High Capacity cDNA reverse tran- scription Kit (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed on 10 ng cDNA using the iTag Universal SYBR Green SuperMix (Bio-Rad, Hertfordshire, UK) and 50 nM of each gene-specific oligonucleotide primer (See Supplementary Table S2): Initial melting (95 °C for 5 minutes) followed by 40 cycles of melting (94 °C for 15 seconds), annealing (60 °C for 15 seconds) and extension (72 °C for 30 seconds) was performed using a CFX TM Connect Real-Time Instrument (Bio-Rad). Transcript levels in the HFD + P group were determined using −(ΔCt1–ΔCt2) 2 , where ΔCt represents the difference between the Ct for each target gene and β-Actin mRNA tran- script levels and are expressed as a ratio of expression relative to the HFD group. Statistical analysis. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the assigned number of independent experiments or number of mice. Prior to significance testing, the normality of the data and the equality of group variance were confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests respectively. Where necessary, normality was achieved using logarithmic transformation. For single comparisons, values of p were determined using Student’s t-test. For multiple comparisons, values of p were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s (equal variance) or Dunnett’s T3 (unequal variance) post-hoc analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical sowa ft re package version 22 (IBM, New York, USA). Significance was defined when p < 0.05. Data availability statement. e d Th atasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. References 1. Bhatnagar, P., Wickramasinghe, K., Williams, J., Rayner, M. & Townsend, N. The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK 2014. Heart 101, 1182–1189, doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307516 (2015). 2. WHO. World Health Organisation, Fact Sheet 317 (2015). 3. McLaren, J. E., Michael, D. R., Ashlin, T. G. & Ramji, D. P. Cytokines, macrophage lipid metabolism and foam cells: Implications for cardiovascular disease therapy. Prog Lipid Res 50, 331-347, doi:1016/j.plipres.2011.04.002 (2011). 4. Taylor, F. et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1, CD004816, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004816.pub5 (2013). 5. Buckley, M. L. & Ramji, D. P. The influence of dysfunctional signaling and lipid homeostasis in mediating the inflammatory responses during atherosclerosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1852, 1498–1510, doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.04.011 (2015). 6. Michael, D. R., Ashlin, T. G., Buckley, M. L. & Ramji, D. P. Macrophages, lipid metabolism and gene expression in atherogenesis: a therapeutic target of the future? Clinical Lipidology 7, 37–48, doi:10.2217/clp.11.73 (2012). 7. Moss, J. W. & Ramji, D. P. Nutraceutical therapies for atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 13, 513–532, doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2016.103 (2016). 8. Banach, M. et al. Statin intolerance - an attempt at a unified definition. Position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel. Arch Med Sci 11, 1–23, doi:10.5114/aoms.2015.49807 (2015). 9. Lichtenstein, A. H. et al. Summary of American Heart Association Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations revision 2006. Arterioscler r Th omb Vasc Biol 26, 2186–2191, doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000238352.25222.5e (2006). 10. Christie, C. Proposed Dietary Guidelines 2015 and Implications for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes. J Cardiovasc Nurs 30, 375–378, doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000286 (2015). 11. Ramsay, L. E., Yeo, W. W. & Jackson, P. R. Dietary reduction of serum cholesterol concentration: time to think again. BMJ 303, 953–957 (1991). 12. Berger, S., Raman, G., Vishwanathan, R., Jacques, P. F. & Johnson, E. J. Dietary cholesterol and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 102, 276–294, doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.100305 (2015). 13. Hill, C. et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientic fi Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11, 506–514, doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 (2014). 14. FAO/WHO. Probiotics in food: health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation: report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food, including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria: Cordoba, Argentina, 1–4 October 2001: report of a Joint FAO/WHO Working Group on Drai ft ng Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2006). 15. DiRienzo, D. B. Effect of probiotics on biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: implications for heart-healthy diets. Nutr Rev 72, 18–29, doi:10.1111/nure.12084 (2014). 16. Sun, J. & Buys, N. Effects of probiotics consumption on lowering lipids and CVD risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med 47, 430–440, doi:10.3109/07853890.2015.1071872 (2015). 17. Guo, Z. et al. Influence of consumption of probiotics on the plasma lipid profile: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 21, 844–850, doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2011.04.008 (2011). 18. Fuentes, M. C., Lajo, T., Carrión, J. M. & Cuñé, J. Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 7527, 7528 and 7529 in hypercholesterolaemic adults. Br J Nutr 109, 1866–1872, doi:10.1017/S000711451200373X (2013). 19. Madjd, A. et al. Comparison of the ee ff ct of daily consumption of probiotic compared with low-fat conventional yogurt on weight loss in healthy obese women following an energy-restricted diet: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 103, 323–329, doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.120170 (2016). 20. Rajkumar, H. et al. Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius UBL S22 and Prebiotic Fructo-oligosaccharide on Serum Lipids, Inflammatory Markers, Insulin Sensitivity, and Gut Bacteria in Healthy Young Volunteers: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Pilot Study. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 20, 289–298, doi:10.1177/1074248414555004 (2015). Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 8 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ 21. Shimizu, M., Hashiguchi, M., Shiga, T., Tamura, H. O. & Mochizuki, M. Meta-Analysis: Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Lipid Proles in N fi ormal to Mildly Hypercholesterolemic Individuals. PLoS One 10, e013979, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139795 (2015). 22. Pereira, D. I. & Gibson, G. R. Cholesterol assimilation by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria isolated from the human gut. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 4689–4693 (2002). 23. Kumar, M. et al. Cholesterol-lowering probiotics as potential biotherapeutics for metabolic diseases. Exp Diabetes Res 2012, 902917, doi:10.1155/2012/902917 (2012). 24. Begley, M., Hill, C. & Gahan, C. G. Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 1729–1738, doi:10.1128/ AEM.72.3.1729-1738.2006 (2006). 25. Yoon, H. S. et al. Reduction in cholesterol absorption in Caco-2 cells through the down-regulation of Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 by the putative probiotic strains Lactobacillus rhamnosus BFE5264 and Lactobacillus plantarum NR74 from fermented foods. Int J Food Sci Nutr 64, 44–52, doi:10.3109/09637486.2012.706598 (2013). 26. Gorenjak, M. et al. Improvement of lipid profile by probiotic/protective cultures: study in a non-carcinogenic small intestinal cell model. New Microbiol 37, 51–64 (2014). 27. Huang, Y. & Zheng, Y. The probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus reduces cholesterol absorption through the down-regulation of Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 in Caco-2 cells. Br J Nutr 103, 473–478, doi:10.1017/S0007114509991991 (2010). 28. Huang, Y. et al. Characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum Lp27 isolated from Tibetan kefir grains: a potential probiotic bacterium with cholesterol-lowering effects. J Dairy Sci 96, 2816–2825, doi:10.3168/jds.2012-6371 (2013). 29. Michael, D. R. et al. Lactobacillus plantarum CUL66 can impact cholesterol homeostasis in Caco-2 enterocytes. Benef Microbes 1–10, doi:10.3920/BM2015.0146 (2016). 30. Williams, E. A. et al. Clinical trial: a multistrain probiotic preparation significantly reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29, 97–103, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03848.x (2009). 31. Garaiova, I. et al. Probiotics and vitamin C for the prevention of respiratory tract infections in children attending preschool: a randomised controlled pilot study. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 373–379, doi:10.1038/ejcn.2014.174 (2015). 32. Allen, S. J. et al. Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and Clostridium difficile diarrhoea in older inpatients (PLACIDE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 382, 1249–1257, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61218-0 (2013). 33. Allen, S. J. et al. Probiotics in the prevention of eczema: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child 99, 1014–1019, doi:10.1136/ archdischild-2013-305799 (2014). 34. Cano, P. G., Santacruz, A., Trejo, F. M. & Sanz, Y. Bifidobacterium CECT 7765 improves metabolic and immunological alterations associated with obesity in high-fat diet-fed mice. Obesity (Silver Spring) 21, 2310–2321, doi:10.1002/oby.20330 (2013). 35. Damodharan, K., Lee, Y. S., Palaniyandi, S. A., Yang, S. H. & Suh, J. W. Preliminary probiotic and technological characterization of Pediococcus pentosaceus strain KID7 and in vivo assessment of its cholesterol-lowering activity. Front Microbiol 6, 768, doi:10.3389/ fmicb.2015.00768 (2015). 36. Kondo, S. et al. Antiobesity effects of Bifidobacterium breve strain B-3 supplementation in a mouse model with high-fat diet-induced obesity. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74, 1656–1661, doi:10.1271/bbb.100267 (2010). 37. Song, M. et al. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus NS1 on plasma cholesterol levels in diet-induced obese mice. J Dairy Sci 98, 1492–1501, doi:10.3168/jds.2014-8586 (2015). 38. Wu, C. C. et al. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum Strain K21 on High-Fat Diet-Fed Obese Mice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015, 391767, doi:10.1155/2015/391767 (2015). 39. Park, D. Y. et al. Supplementation of Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 in diet-induced obese mice is associated with gut microbial changes and reduction in obesity. PLoS One 8, e59470, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059470 (2013). 40. Yoo, S. R. et al. Probiotics L. plantarum and L. curvatus in combination alter hepatic lipid metabolism and suppress diet-induced obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 21, 2571–2578, doi:10.1002/oby.20428 (2013). 41. Tanaka, H., Doesburg, K., Iwasaki, T. & Mierau, I. Screening of lactic acid bacteria for bile salt hydrolase activity. J Dairy Sci 82, 2530–2535, doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75506-2 (1999). 42. Tomaro-Duchesneau, C. et al. Cholesterol assimilation by Lactobacillus probiotic bacteria: an in vitro investigation. Biomed Res Int 2014, 380316, doi:10.1155/2014/380316 (2014). 43. Shehata, M. G., El Sohaimy, S. A., El-Sahn, M. A. & Youssef, M. M. Screening of isolated potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria for cholesterol lowering property and bile salt hydrolase activity. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 61, 65–75, doi:10.1016/j. aoas.2016.03.001 (2016). 44. Pavlovic, N., Stankov, K. & Mikov, M. Probiotics–interactions with bile acids and impact on cholesterol metabolism. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 168, 1880–1895, doi:10.1007/s12010-012-9904-4 (2012). 45. Degirolamo, C., Rainaldi, S., Bovenga, F., Murzilli, S. & Moschetta, A. Microbiota modification with probiotics induces hepatic bile acid synthesis via downregulation of the Fxr-Fgf15 axis in mice. Cell Rep 7, 12–18, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.032 (2014). 46. Goodwin, B. et al. A regulatory cascade of the nuclear receptors FXR, SHP-1, and LRH-1 represses bile acid biosynthesis. Mol Cell 6, 517–526 (2000). 47. Chen, Q., Wang, E., Ma, L. & Zhai, P. Dietary resveratrol increases the expression of hepatic 7alpha-hydroxylase and ameliorates hypercholesterolemia in high-fat fed C57BL/6J mice. Lipids Health Dis 11, 56, doi:10.1186/1476-511X-11-56 (2012). 48. Chen, M. L. et al. Resveratrol Attenuates Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO)-Induced Atherosclerosis by Regulating TMAO Synthesis and Bile Acid Metabolism via Remodeling of the Gut Microbiota. MBio 7, e02210–02215, doi:10.1128/mBio.02210-15 (2016). 49. Jeun, J. et al. Hypocholesterolemic effects of Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC3928 by increased bile acid excretion in C57BL/6 mice. Nutrition 26, 321–330, doi:10.1016/j.nut.2009.04.011 (2010). 50. Stroeve, J. H. et al. Intestinal FXR-mediated FGF15 production contributes to diurnal control of hepatic bile acid synthesis in mice. Lab Invest 90, 1457–1467, doi:10.1038/labinvest.2010.107 (2010). 51. Inagaki, T. et al. Fibroblast growth factor 15 functions as an enterohepatic signal to regulate bile acid homeostasis. Cell Metab 2, 217–225, doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2005.09.001 (2005). 52. Engelking, L. J., McFarlane, M. R., Li, C. K. & Liang, G. Blockade of cholesterol absorption by ezetimibe reveals a complex homeostatic network in enterocytes. J Lipid Res 53, 1359–1368, doi:10.1194/jlr.M027599 (2012). 53. Catry, E. et al. Ezetimibe and simvastatin modulate gut microbiota and expression of genes related to cholesterol metabolism. Life Sci 132, 77–84, doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2015.04.004 (2015). 54. Telford, D. E. et al. The molecular mechanisms underlying the reduction of LDL apoB-100 by ezetimibe plus simvastatin. J Lipid Res 48, 699–708, doi:10.1194/jlr.M600439-JLR200 (2007). 55. Ooi, L. G. & Liong, M. T. Cholesterol-lowering effects of probiotics and prebiotics: a review of in vivo and in vitro findings. Int J Mol Sci 11, 2499–2522, doi:10.3390/ijms11062499 (2010). 56. Kurdi, P. et al. Cholic acid accumulation and its diminution by short-chain fatty acids in bifidobacteria. Microbiology 149, 2031–2037, doi:10.1099/mic.0.26376-0 (2003). 57. Kurdi, P. et al. Cholic acid is accumulated spontaneously, driven by membrane deltapH, in many lactobacilli. J Bacteriol 182, 6525–6528 (2000). 58. Saraa fi n, M. H. et al. Bile acid profiling and quantification in biouid fl s using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 87, 9662–9670, doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01556 (2015). Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 9 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge Martyn Allen, Kathryn A. Turner and Hedda L. Köhling of Cultech Limited for their technical assistance during the study. Author Contributions T.R.H., D.P.R., D.R.M. and S.F.P. were responsible for the design of the study. Experiments were performed by T.R.H., T.S.D., D.R.M., J.W.E.M., D.L.C. and A.P. Data analysis was performed by D.R.M., T.S.D., J.R.M. and A.P., D.R.M. prepared the manuscript and all authors contributed to the review of the manuscript. Additional Information Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 Competing Interests: This study was supported by Cultech Ltd, Port Talbot, UK. DRM, TSD, DLC and SFP are or were employees of Cultech Ltd. JWEM is a PhD student funded by a joint studentship from the School of Biosciences, Cardiff University and Cultech Ltd. Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Cre- ative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not per- mitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2017 Scientific Repo R ts | 7: 2883 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02889-5 10
Scientific Reports – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 6, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera