The accuracy of remapping irregularly spaced velocity data onto a regular grid and the computation of vorticity

The accuracy of remapping irregularly spaced velocity data onto a regular grid and the... The velocity data obtained from molecular tagging velocimetry (MTV) are typically located on an irregularly spaced measurement grid. To take advantage of many standard data processing techniques, the MTV data need to be remapped onto a grid with a uniform spacing. In this work, accuracy and noise issues related to the use of a least-squares-fit to various low order polynomials for the remapping of these data onto a uniformly spaced grid and the subsequent computation of vorticity from these data are examined. This information has relevance to PIV data processing as well. It has been previously noted that the best estimate of the velocity vector acquired through the use of tracer techniques such as PIV, is at the midpoint of the displacement vector. Thus, unless special care is taken, PIV data are also initially obtained on an irregular grid. The error in the remapped velocity and the calculated vorticity field is divided into a mean bias error and a random error. In the majority of cases, the mean bias error is a more significant source of error than the more often quoted random error. Results of the simulation show that the best choice for remapping is the use of a least-squares fit to a 2nd order polynomial and the best choice for vorticity calculation is to use a 4th order accurate, central, finite difference applied to uniformly sampled data. The actual value of the error depends upon the data density and the radius used for the selection of velocity measurements to be included in the remapping process. Increasing the data density and reducing the fit radius improve the accuracy. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Experiments in Fluids Springer Journals

The accuracy of remapping irregularly spaced velocity data onto a regular grid and the computation of vorticity

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/the-accuracy-of-remapping-irregularly-spaced-velocity-data-onto-a-TUndVqAwCO
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Engineering; Engineering Fluid Dynamics; Fluid- and Aerodynamics; Engineering Thermodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer
ISSN
0723-4864
eISSN
1432-1114
D.O.I.
10.1007/s003480070008
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The velocity data obtained from molecular tagging velocimetry (MTV) are typically located on an irregularly spaced measurement grid. To take advantage of many standard data processing techniques, the MTV data need to be remapped onto a grid with a uniform spacing. In this work, accuracy and noise issues related to the use of a least-squares-fit to various low order polynomials for the remapping of these data onto a uniformly spaced grid and the subsequent computation of vorticity from these data are examined. This information has relevance to PIV data processing as well. It has been previously noted that the best estimate of the velocity vector acquired through the use of tracer techniques such as PIV, is at the midpoint of the displacement vector. Thus, unless special care is taken, PIV data are also initially obtained on an irregular grid. The error in the remapped velocity and the calculated vorticity field is divided into a mean bias error and a random error. In the majority of cases, the mean bias error is a more significant source of error than the more often quoted random error. Results of the simulation show that the best choice for remapping is the use of a least-squares fit to a 2nd order polynomial and the best choice for vorticity calculation is to use a 4th order accurate, central, finite difference applied to uniformly sampled data. The actual value of the error depends upon the data density and the radius used for the selection of velocity measurements to be included in the remapping process. Increasing the data density and reducing the fit radius improve the accuracy.

Journal

Experiments in FluidsSpringer Journals

Published: Dec 31, 2000

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off