# Targeting writing interventions to emotional processing level: a factorial experimental design

Targeting writing interventions to emotional processing level: a factorial experimental design Emotional processing (EP) from the emotional approach coping measure has been shown to moderate the effect of writing interventions. This study targeted writing interventions to EP level, with low EP participants receiving a best possible self (BPS) script and high EP participants receiving an emotional expression (EMO) script, versus a control (CTL) writing script. A factorial experimental design was used to balance the potential factors gender, spacing of interventions, and whether participants were instructed to keep or give their writing samples to the administrator. Post-test measures were taken 1 month after completion of writing. Sixty-four undergraduates (66 % female) participated. Those with high EP ( $$\hbox {EP}\,\ge \,3$$ EP ≥ 3 ) were assigned EMO or CTL; those with low EP ( $$\hbox {EP}\,\le \,3$$ EP ≤ 3 ) were assigned BPS or CTL. These targeted interventions had significantly better results than CTL for change in last month’s need based healthcare visits ( $$p = .0058$$ p = . 0058 ) and health symptoms ( $$p = .0107$$ p = . 0107 ). Analysis of health symptoms showed that only cold/flu ( $$p = .0369$$ p = . 0369 ), headaches ( $$p = .0393$$ p = . 0393 ), sinus ( $$p = .0411$$ p = . 0411 ), and diarrhea ( $$p = .0089$$ p = . 0089 ) showed a significant change. Data modeling suggests that gender, EP, intervention, and spacing were active factors contributing to change in health, and that interactions between them should also be taken into account. Analysis of the CTL intervention showed a marked worsening of health for low EP participants but a mild or negligible effect on health for high EP. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality & Quantity Springer Journals

# Targeting writing interventions to emotional processing level: a factorial experimental design

Quality & Quantity, Volume 48 (6) – Oct 4, 2013
24 pages

/lp/springer_journal/targeting-writing-interventions-to-emotional-processing-level-a-bZ0gOjVpP9
Publisher
Springer Journals
Subject
Social Sciences, general; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0033-5177
eISSN
1573-7845
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11135-013-9933-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

### Abstract

Emotional processing (EP) from the emotional approach coping measure has been shown to moderate the effect of writing interventions. This study targeted writing interventions to EP level, with low EP participants receiving a best possible self (BPS) script and high EP participants receiving an emotional expression (EMO) script, versus a control (CTL) writing script. A factorial experimental design was used to balance the potential factors gender, spacing of interventions, and whether participants were instructed to keep or give their writing samples to the administrator. Post-test measures were taken 1 month after completion of writing. Sixty-four undergraduates (66 % female) participated. Those with high EP ( $$\hbox {EP}\,\ge \,3$$ EP ≥ 3 ) were assigned EMO or CTL; those with low EP ( $$\hbox {EP}\,\le \,3$$ EP ≤ 3 ) were assigned BPS or CTL. These targeted interventions had significantly better results than CTL for change in last month’s need based healthcare visits ( $$p = .0058$$ p = . 0058 ) and health symptoms ( $$p = .0107$$ p = . 0107 ). Analysis of health symptoms showed that only cold/flu ( $$p = .0369$$ p = . 0369 ), headaches ( $$p = .0393$$ p = . 0393 ), sinus ( $$p = .0411$$ p = . 0411 ), and diarrhea ( $$p = .0089$$ p = . 0089 ) showed a significant change. Data modeling suggests that gender, EP, intervention, and spacing were active factors contributing to change in health, and that interactions between them should also be taken into account. Analysis of the CTL intervention showed a marked worsening of health for low EP participants but a mild or negligible effect on health for high EP.

### Journal

Quality & QuantitySpringer Journals

Published: Oct 4, 2013

## You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

### DeepDyve is your personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
that matters to you.

over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month ### Explore the DeepDyve Library ### Search Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly ### Organize Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place. ### Access Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals. ### Your journals are on DeepDyve Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more. All the latest content is available, no embargo periods. DeepDyve ### Freelancer DeepDyve ### Pro Price FREE$49/month
\$360/year

Save searches from
PubMed

Create lists to

Export lists, citations