Surgical versus pathological excision margins—an excision too far?

Surgical versus pathological excision margins—an excision too far? A common observation by clinicians who surgically excise skin pathology is the discrepancy between the measured size of the surgical specimen and that of the measurements reported by the examining pathologist. This discrepancy can often be the difference between whether, in the case of skin malignancies, the patient requires further wider excision, follow-up and, in cases where relevant, discharge. Could it therefore mean that patients are needlessly undergoing further excisions that could be avoided with more careful attention to specimen measurements and specimen ‘shrinkage,’ both surgically and pathologically? We measured the length and width of skin lesions excised pre- and post-operatively and compared these measurements with the reported histopathological measurements. A significant difference in length ( p = 0.000) and width ( p = 0.001) exists between pre- and post-operative measurements. No significant difference exists between post-operative and pathological measurements of length ( p = 0.072) or width ( p = 0.157). Length of time preserved in 10% formalin did not make a significant difference to specimen size ( p = 0.47). The aim of clinicians is to excise fully all skin pathology relevant for excision, ensuring sufficient clear margins to prevent potential recurrence whilst trying to sacrifice as little ‘normal’ tissue as possible in the process. What this study helps to highlight is the fact that clinicians cannot take for granted the reported measurements on the histopathology reports, upon which subsequent clinical management on reported excision margins are often based, without taking into consideration documented excision margins and subsequent allowance for significant specimen shrinkage, often resulting, for malignancies, in further wider excisions that are potentially disfiguring, and in the authors opinion, in more cases than currently thought, unnecessary. If one also factors in the fact that malignant cells shrink less than both benign tumours and, most importantly, normal skin, then subsequent reported pathological margins may be increasingly inaccurate as the excision margins may indeed be greater. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Surgical versus pathological excision margins—an excision too far?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/surgical-versus-pathological-excision-margins-an-excision-too-far-vM0KLhFgAo
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-009-0384-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A common observation by clinicians who surgically excise skin pathology is the discrepancy between the measured size of the surgical specimen and that of the measurements reported by the examining pathologist. This discrepancy can often be the difference between whether, in the case of skin malignancies, the patient requires further wider excision, follow-up and, in cases where relevant, discharge. Could it therefore mean that patients are needlessly undergoing further excisions that could be avoided with more careful attention to specimen measurements and specimen ‘shrinkage,’ both surgically and pathologically? We measured the length and width of skin lesions excised pre- and post-operatively and compared these measurements with the reported histopathological measurements. A significant difference in length ( p = 0.000) and width ( p = 0.001) exists between pre- and post-operative measurements. No significant difference exists between post-operative and pathological measurements of length ( p = 0.072) or width ( p = 0.157). Length of time preserved in 10% formalin did not make a significant difference to specimen size ( p = 0.47). The aim of clinicians is to excise fully all skin pathology relevant for excision, ensuring sufficient clear margins to prevent potential recurrence whilst trying to sacrifice as little ‘normal’ tissue as possible in the process. What this study helps to highlight is the fact that clinicians cannot take for granted the reported measurements on the histopathology reports, upon which subsequent clinical management on reported excision margins are often based, without taking into consideration documented excision margins and subsequent allowance for significant specimen shrinkage, often resulting, for malignancies, in further wider excisions that are potentially disfiguring, and in the authors opinion, in more cases than currently thought, unnecessary. If one also factors in the fact that malignant cells shrink less than both benign tumours and, most importantly, normal skin, then subsequent reported pathological margins may be increasingly inaccurate as the excision margins may indeed be greater.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 2010

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off