Surgical endodontic retreatment

Surgical endodontic retreatment Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41894-018-0027-3 TREATMENT 1 2 Peter Jonasson  · Magnús Friðjón Ragnarsson Received: 9 March 2018 / Accepted: 2 April 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Surgical retreatment is a predictable treatment option for teeth with post- treatment apical periodontitis. The main objective is to eliminate and prevent bacte- rial infection in the root canal system from causing an inflammatory reaction in the periradicular tissue. Keywords Apical surgery · Apicectomy · Retrograde root canal treatment · Surgical retreatment Indications Apical periodontitis Blocked root canals Presence of posts, ledges, or broken instruments Presence of foreign body in the periapical tissues Radicular cyst Extraradicular infection Surgical exploration/diagnostics * Peter Jonasson Peter.Jonasson@odontologi.gu.se Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Hafnarfirði, Iceland 1 3 17 Page 2 of 5 Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 Materials/instruments Surgical operating microscope Local anesthesia Epinephrine Cotton pellet Aluminum chloride or ferric sulfate Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Ultrasonic tips Surgical burs Saline Surgical sutures Procedure To choose the treatment option a thorough clinical and radiographic examination, including adjacent and opposing teeth, should be performed. Along with the other basic assessments, following considerations should also be made during surgical retreatment planning [1]: Technical considerations Surgical retreatment should be considered when orthograde retreatment fails to control the infection or cannot be undertaken due to blocked canals caused by dys- trophic calcifications or iatrogenic errors such as ledges, broken instruments and presence of posts (Fig. 1). Biological considerations Surgical retreatment is indicated when a persistent infection is suspected after root canal treatment [2]. The presence of extraradicular infection [3], radicular cyst or a foreign body in the periapical tissues can cause endodontic failure by triggering an inflammatory response [4]. A local deep pocket is also an aggravating factor for the Fig. 1 a Radiograph of the upper left first molar with a fractured instrument in the mesiobuccal root diagnosed with symptomatic apical periodontitis. b Immediately postoperatively. c A 1-year follow-up 1 3 Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 Page 3 of 5 17 Fig. 2 a Upper right second premolar with a deep pocket located buccal. b An exploration is done to inspect the root surface. c A vertical fracture line seen after removing the soft tissue and staining with methylene blue Fig. 3 An upper molar with a symptomatic apical periodontitis. a The radiographs show a periapical radiolucency and fractured instrument in the apical third of the mesiobuccal root. b With a mesial eccen- tric radiographs, the root-filled canal in the mesiobuccal root moves from the X-rays, not centralized in the canal, indicating a second untreated canal prognosis. As part of the diagnostic examination, a surgical exploration may be an alternative for excluding a vertical root fracture from a sinus tract formation origi- nating from an endodontic lesion (Fig. 2). Anatomical considerations The accessibility of the site of infection should be judged preoperatively. Periapical radiographs should be carefully evaluated in different angulations for planning and performing treatment (Fig. 3). In the lower jaw, proximity to the mandibular nerve and/or a thick cortical bone buccal to the tooth may limit the accessibility. In upper jaw, the accessibility to the palatal root is limited surgically especially for the second maxillary molars. Surgical treatment on teeth with apex or a periapical lesion in close apposition to the maxillary sinus should be carefully performed. Medical considerations There are no absolute medical contraindications to endodontic surgery. However, there are several medical conditions and medications that cause a depressed immune 1 3 17 Page 4 of 5 Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 system, where surgical intervention is contraindicated until white blood cell count and antibody levels become normal. Patients with increased risk for bleeding need special attention. Patients with haemophilia or impaired liver function should only be treated after consultation and in agreement with the patient’s physician. Medica- tion with antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents increase the bleeding time intra- and postoperatively. Surgical treatment is possible in most cases but need certain treat- ment protocols. Endodontic surgery technique Today’s state-of-the-art in surgical endodontic retreatment is a minimal invasive microsurgical approach which is described in the following: • To gain access to the root, a horizontal incision is given either including the papilla or cutting through the base of papilla. Submarginal incision is often rec- ommended to minimize the risk of gingival recession in the esthetic zone. Subse- quently, a full-thickness flap is raised. • The highly vascularized granulation tissue in the bone crypt is removed. Hemostasis is achieved using local anesthesia containing epinephrine. Alu- minium chloride or ferric sulfate can also be used for controlling bone crypt hemorrhage. If more severe bleeding occurs, electrocauterization may be consid- ered. • Root resection is performed to eliminate infected ramifications, lateral canals and contaminated dentin. A root resection of 3  mm (mm) apically is sufficient to remove most of the infected ramifications and lateral canals. It is performed in a 90° angle to the long axis of the root. This minimizes any leakage that can occur through cut dentinal tubules. Retrograde root-end cavities are prepared by ultrasonic tips in exposed canal orifices. MTA is used for root-end filling (Fig. 4). • The wound surface is thoroughly irrigated with the saline and the wound is closed using surgical sutures for optimal healing. Surgical sutures should hold Fig. 4 Single-rooted maxillary incisor treated by surgical retreatment using microsurgical technique. a The resected root and canal with gutta-percha seen in the micro-mirror and microscope (×6) with good haemostatic control. b Retrograde preparation with a contra-angled ultrasonic tip (3 mm). c Application of the retrograde filling (MTA) 1 3 Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 Page 5 of 5 17 the edges of a flap in apposition until the wound has healed sufficiently to with- stand the normal functional stresses and resist reopening. Resorbable or non-resorbable threads in diameters 5–0 or 6–0 and three- eighths reverse-cutting or tapered needle are used. The sutures are removed after 7–14 days. Pitfalls and complications Pain and swelling after surgical treatment. Secondary infection of the surgical site. An insult to blood vessels. Lack of control of possible coronal leakage and carious lesions under restora- tions. Limited access to the root canal full length. Limited possibility to use chemical disinfection. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Inter- national License (http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribu- tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. References 1. Kvist T (ed) (2017) Apical periodontitis in root-filled teeth surgical retreatment. https ://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-57250 -5_7 2. Nair PN (2006) On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 39(4):249–281 3. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2008) Apical actinomycosis as a continuum of intraradicular and extra- radicular infection: case report and critical review on its involvement with treatment failure. J Endod 34(9):1124–1129 4. Stockdale CR, Chandler NP (1988) The nature of the periapical lesion—a review of 1108 cases. J Dent 16(3):123–129 1 3 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Dentistry Reviewed Springer Journals

Surgical endodontic retreatment

Free
5 pages
Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/surgical-endodontic-retreatment-5IqgP5gs4Y
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by The Author(s)
Subject
Dentistry; Dentistry
eISSN
2511-1965
D.O.I.
10.1007/s41894-018-0027-3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41894-018-0027-3 TREATMENT 1 2 Peter Jonasson  · Magnús Friðjón Ragnarsson Received: 9 March 2018 / Accepted: 2 April 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Surgical retreatment is a predictable treatment option for teeth with post- treatment apical periodontitis. The main objective is to eliminate and prevent bacte- rial infection in the root canal system from causing an inflammatory reaction in the periradicular tissue. Keywords Apical surgery · Apicectomy · Retrograde root canal treatment · Surgical retreatment Indications Apical periodontitis Blocked root canals Presence of posts, ledges, or broken instruments Presence of foreign body in the periapical tissues Radicular cyst Extraradicular infection Surgical exploration/diagnostics * Peter Jonasson Peter.Jonasson@odontologi.gu.se Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Hafnarfirði, Iceland 1 3 17 Page 2 of 5 Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 Materials/instruments Surgical operating microscope Local anesthesia Epinephrine Cotton pellet Aluminum chloride or ferric sulfate Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Ultrasonic tips Surgical burs Saline Surgical sutures Procedure To choose the treatment option a thorough clinical and radiographic examination, including adjacent and opposing teeth, should be performed. Along with the other basic assessments, following considerations should also be made during surgical retreatment planning [1]: Technical considerations Surgical retreatment should be considered when orthograde retreatment fails to control the infection or cannot be undertaken due to blocked canals caused by dys- trophic calcifications or iatrogenic errors such as ledges, broken instruments and presence of posts (Fig. 1). Biological considerations Surgical retreatment is indicated when a persistent infection is suspected after root canal treatment [2]. The presence of extraradicular infection [3], radicular cyst or a foreign body in the periapical tissues can cause endodontic failure by triggering an inflammatory response [4]. A local deep pocket is also an aggravating factor for the Fig. 1 a Radiograph of the upper left first molar with a fractured instrument in the mesiobuccal root diagnosed with symptomatic apical periodontitis. b Immediately postoperatively. c A 1-year follow-up 1 3 Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 Page 3 of 5 17 Fig. 2 a Upper right second premolar with a deep pocket located buccal. b An exploration is done to inspect the root surface. c A vertical fracture line seen after removing the soft tissue and staining with methylene blue Fig. 3 An upper molar with a symptomatic apical periodontitis. a The radiographs show a periapical radiolucency and fractured instrument in the apical third of the mesiobuccal root. b With a mesial eccen- tric radiographs, the root-filled canal in the mesiobuccal root moves from the X-rays, not centralized in the canal, indicating a second untreated canal prognosis. As part of the diagnostic examination, a surgical exploration may be an alternative for excluding a vertical root fracture from a sinus tract formation origi- nating from an endodontic lesion (Fig. 2). Anatomical considerations The accessibility of the site of infection should be judged preoperatively. Periapical radiographs should be carefully evaluated in different angulations for planning and performing treatment (Fig. 3). In the lower jaw, proximity to the mandibular nerve and/or a thick cortical bone buccal to the tooth may limit the accessibility. In upper jaw, the accessibility to the palatal root is limited surgically especially for the second maxillary molars. Surgical treatment on teeth with apex or a periapical lesion in close apposition to the maxillary sinus should be carefully performed. Medical considerations There are no absolute medical contraindications to endodontic surgery. However, there are several medical conditions and medications that cause a depressed immune 1 3 17 Page 4 of 5 Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 system, where surgical intervention is contraindicated until white blood cell count and antibody levels become normal. Patients with increased risk for bleeding need special attention. Patients with haemophilia or impaired liver function should only be treated after consultation and in agreement with the patient’s physician. Medica- tion with antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents increase the bleeding time intra- and postoperatively. Surgical treatment is possible in most cases but need certain treat- ment protocols. Endodontic surgery technique Today’s state-of-the-art in surgical endodontic retreatment is a minimal invasive microsurgical approach which is described in the following: • To gain access to the root, a horizontal incision is given either including the papilla or cutting through the base of papilla. Submarginal incision is often rec- ommended to minimize the risk of gingival recession in the esthetic zone. Subse- quently, a full-thickness flap is raised. • The highly vascularized granulation tissue in the bone crypt is removed. Hemostasis is achieved using local anesthesia containing epinephrine. Alu- minium chloride or ferric sulfate can also be used for controlling bone crypt hemorrhage. If more severe bleeding occurs, electrocauterization may be consid- ered. • Root resection is performed to eliminate infected ramifications, lateral canals and contaminated dentin. A root resection of 3  mm (mm) apically is sufficient to remove most of the infected ramifications and lateral canals. It is performed in a 90° angle to the long axis of the root. This minimizes any leakage that can occur through cut dentinal tubules. Retrograde root-end cavities are prepared by ultrasonic tips in exposed canal orifices. MTA is used for root-end filling (Fig. 4). • The wound surface is thoroughly irrigated with the saline and the wound is closed using surgical sutures for optimal healing. Surgical sutures should hold Fig. 4 Single-rooted maxillary incisor treated by surgical retreatment using microsurgical technique. a The resected root and canal with gutta-percha seen in the micro-mirror and microscope (×6) with good haemostatic control. b Retrograde preparation with a contra-angled ultrasonic tip (3 mm). c Application of the retrograde filling (MTA) 1 3 Clin Dent Rev (2018) 2:17 Page 5 of 5 17 the edges of a flap in apposition until the wound has healed sufficiently to with- stand the normal functional stresses and resist reopening. Resorbable or non-resorbable threads in diameters 5–0 or 6–0 and three- eighths reverse-cutting or tapered needle are used. The sutures are removed after 7–14 days. Pitfalls and complications Pain and swelling after surgical treatment. Secondary infection of the surgical site. An insult to blood vessels. Lack of control of possible coronal leakage and carious lesions under restora- tions. Limited access to the root canal full length. Limited possibility to use chemical disinfection. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Inter- national License (http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribu- tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. References 1. Kvist T (ed) (2017) Apical periodontitis in root-filled teeth surgical retreatment. https ://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-57250 -5_7 2. Nair PN (2006) On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 39(4):249–281 3. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2008) Apical actinomycosis as a continuum of intraradicular and extra- radicular infection: case report and critical review on its involvement with treatment failure. J Endod 34(9):1124–1129 4. Stockdale CR, Chandler NP (1988) The nature of the periapical lesion—a review of 1108 cases. J Dent 16(3):123–129 1 3

Journal

Clinical Dentistry ReviewedSpringer Journals

Published: May 28, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off