Suitability of aerial and satellite data for calculation of site-specific nitrogen fertilisation compared to ground based sensor data

Suitability of aerial and satellite data for calculation of site-specific nitrogen fertilisation... Signals for determining rates for site-specific nitrogen fertilisation can be obtained via different sensors. Optical systems that record the nitrogen supply status of the plant via the reflected sunlight have been widely validated. In particular, ground based systems like the YARA N-Sensor have been put into practice. However, such sensors have disadvantages as they only record a small part of the crop population to the left and right of the tramline. This disadvantage is overcome by data obtained from the air (aircraft) or space (satellite). In the study presented, three systems—ground, aerial and space—were compared; of particular interest were data from the RapidEye-System, which has delivered data since 2009. The comparison showed that if the (well suited) Red Edge Inflection Point (REIP) has to be calculated for the determination of the site-specific amount of N-fertiliser, then the system based on satellite imagery would not be suitable for determining N-rates. In addition, the delivered data were shifted by 35 m and had to be corrected. The aerial system also delivered spatially shifted data, however the REIP can be calculated without a problem. Upon considering the costs and the weather dependant availability of the data, the ground based system was most suitable, despite its disadvantage of providing an incomplete crop recording; the aerial system, however, provides a good alternative if its costs can be reduced. The space system would be a good alternative if it were able to deliver all four wavelength ranges that are necessary for the REIP. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Precision Agriculture Springer Journals

Suitability of aerial and satellite data for calculation of site-specific nitrogen fertilisation compared to ground based sensor data

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/suitability-of-aerial-and-satellite-data-for-calculation-of-site-5DScJ8jrVW
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Life Sciences; Agriculture; Soil Science & Conservation; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Statistics for Engineering, Physics, Computer Science, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; Meteorology/Climatology
ISSN
1385-2256
eISSN
1573-1618
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11119-012-9278-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Signals for determining rates for site-specific nitrogen fertilisation can be obtained via different sensors. Optical systems that record the nitrogen supply status of the plant via the reflected sunlight have been widely validated. In particular, ground based systems like the YARA N-Sensor have been put into practice. However, such sensors have disadvantages as they only record a small part of the crop population to the left and right of the tramline. This disadvantage is overcome by data obtained from the air (aircraft) or space (satellite). In the study presented, three systems—ground, aerial and space—were compared; of particular interest were data from the RapidEye-System, which has delivered data since 2009. The comparison showed that if the (well suited) Red Edge Inflection Point (REIP) has to be calculated for the determination of the site-specific amount of N-fertiliser, then the system based on satellite imagery would not be suitable for determining N-rates. In addition, the delivered data were shifted by 35 m and had to be corrected. The aerial system also delivered spatially shifted data, however the REIP can be calculated without a problem. Upon considering the costs and the weather dependant availability of the data, the ground based system was most suitable, despite its disadvantage of providing an incomplete crop recording; the aerial system, however, provides a good alternative if its costs can be reduced. The space system would be a good alternative if it were able to deliver all four wavelength ranges that are necessary for the REIP.

Journal

Precision AgricultureSpringer Journals

Published: Sep 29, 2012

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off