Strategies to optimize marker-assisted introgression of multiple unlinked QTL

Strategies to optimize marker-assisted introgression of multiple unlinked QTL To optimize designs to implement marker-assisted introgression programs aiming to introgress three unlinked quantitative trait loci (QTL), the present paper studies different alternatives versus a traditional backcross or intercross phase. Four alternative backcross strategies appear to be more advantageous by having 50% less genotyping load than a traditional backcross strategy tracking all three QTL at a time through a single line. A multiplication phase following the selection of homozygous animals at the three QTL as an intercross alternative allows doubling of the number of homozygous animals in a mouse model compared with the first intercross generation. Within the same model, a second intercross alternative with individuals carrying all three QTL at the first intercross results in a 12-fold increase in the number of homozygous animals obtained in the first intercross generation. The same ranges of decrease are observed in the number of animals to be genotyped and the number of genotypings when targeting a fixed number of homozygous animals. An option, with two lines each carrying two QTL through the backcross phase and coupled with the second intercross alternative, appears to be the best introgression alternative. This option requires 76% fewer genotypings, 68% fewer animals to be genotyped, and costs 75% less than an option in which all three QTL are introgressed through a single line. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Mammalian Genome Springer Journals

Strategies to optimize marker-assisted introgression of multiple unlinked QTL

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/strategies-to-optimize-marker-assisted-introgression-of-multiple-stcKzXmQYV
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
Subject
Life Sciences; Cell Biology; Animal Genetics and Genomics; Human Genetics
ISSN
0938-8990
eISSN
1432-1777
D.O.I.
10.1007/s003350010028
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To optimize designs to implement marker-assisted introgression programs aiming to introgress three unlinked quantitative trait loci (QTL), the present paper studies different alternatives versus a traditional backcross or intercross phase. Four alternative backcross strategies appear to be more advantageous by having 50% less genotyping load than a traditional backcross strategy tracking all three QTL at a time through a single line. A multiplication phase following the selection of homozygous animals at the three QTL as an intercross alternative allows doubling of the number of homozygous animals in a mouse model compared with the first intercross generation. Within the same model, a second intercross alternative with individuals carrying all three QTL at the first intercross results in a 12-fold increase in the number of homozygous animals obtained in the first intercross generation. The same ranges of decrease are observed in the number of animals to be genotyped and the number of genotypings when targeting a fixed number of homozygous animals. An option, with two lines each carrying two QTL through the backcross phase and coupled with the second intercross alternative, appears to be the best introgression alternative. This option requires 76% fewer genotypings, 68% fewer animals to be genotyped, and costs 75% less than an option in which all three QTL are introgressed through a single line.

Journal

Mammalian GenomeSpringer Journals

Published: Feb 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off