“Stat” Medication Administration Predicts Hospital Discharge

“Stat” Medication Administration Predicts Hospital Discharge Objective This study describes the use of “stat” medications for inpatients in a large state psychiatric hospital system, and examines the relationship between receipt of a “stat” for agitation and subsequent hospital discharge. Methods Use of “stat” medications in 2005 was retrospectively determined using a database that contains diagnosis and prescription information from 17 state-run adult civil facilities. A logistic regression model explored the relationship between receipt of a “stat” order for intramuscular preparations of either antipsychotics or lorazepam within the first 30 days of hospitalization and likelihood of hospital discharge by 6 months. Results Among 7,202 patients who received antipsychotic medication in 2005, 3,240 (45%) also received a “stat” psychotropic medication during that year. Among 40,651 stat orders, 19,142 (47%) were for intramuscular antipsychotics or lorazepam presumably given for the treatment of agitation. Among 1,673 patients admitted in the first 6 months of 2005, 415 (25%) received at least one such “agitation stat.” The percent discharged at six months among “agitation stat” receivers was 39%, compared to 69% among those who did not receive an “agitation stat” (chi-square = 115, df = 1, P < .001). Regression analysis showed that receiving an “agitation stat” in the first 30 days of hospitalization was associated with a 37% lower likelihood of being discharged by 6 months after admission (odds ratio .63, 95% CI: .46–.86). Conclusions “Stat” medications are commonly used. The use of “agitation stat” medications can be used as a proxy for clinical stability and may prove to be a useful outcome measure for future pharmacoepidemiologic studies of comparative medication effectiveness. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychiatric Quarterly Springer Journals

“Stat” Medication Administration Predicts Hospital Discharge

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/stat-medication-administration-predicts-hospital-discharge-KkyQVBfuPO
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Psychiatry; Public Health; Sociology, general
ISSN
0033-2720
eISSN
1573-6709
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11126-009-9097-3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Objective This study describes the use of “stat” medications for inpatients in a large state psychiatric hospital system, and examines the relationship between receipt of a “stat” for agitation and subsequent hospital discharge. Methods Use of “stat” medications in 2005 was retrospectively determined using a database that contains diagnosis and prescription information from 17 state-run adult civil facilities. A logistic regression model explored the relationship between receipt of a “stat” order for intramuscular preparations of either antipsychotics or lorazepam within the first 30 days of hospitalization and likelihood of hospital discharge by 6 months. Results Among 7,202 patients who received antipsychotic medication in 2005, 3,240 (45%) also received a “stat” psychotropic medication during that year. Among 40,651 stat orders, 19,142 (47%) were for intramuscular antipsychotics or lorazepam presumably given for the treatment of agitation. Among 1,673 patients admitted in the first 6 months of 2005, 415 (25%) received at least one such “agitation stat.” The percent discharged at six months among “agitation stat” receivers was 39%, compared to 69% among those who did not receive an “agitation stat” (chi-square = 115, df = 1, P < .001). Regression analysis showed that receiving an “agitation stat” in the first 30 days of hospitalization was associated with a 37% lower likelihood of being discharged by 6 months after admission (odds ratio .63, 95% CI: .46–.86). Conclusions “Stat” medications are commonly used. The use of “agitation stat” medications can be used as a proxy for clinical stability and may prove to be a useful outcome measure for future pharmacoepidemiologic studies of comparative medication effectiveness.

Journal

Psychiatric QuarterlySpringer Journals

Published: Mar 14, 2009

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off