Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe

Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe Rev Austrian Econ (2011) 24:71–76 DOI 10.1007/s11138-011-0146-4 Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe Robert F. Garnett Jr. Published online: 9 February 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 . . . Keywords Pluralism Republic of science Schools of thought Constitutional . . . . . . citizenship Rules Virtues Ethics Promiscuity Analytical egalitarianism James . . Buchanan Deirdre McCloskey Matt Ridley I am grateful to the Review of Austrian Economics and to Peter Boettke for welcoming this conversation about pluralism and Austrian economics. In my paper, “Why Should Austrian Economists be Pluralists?”, I highlighted an incongruity between Boettke's classical liberal vision of a free society and his vision of science as a free market (Boettke 2007). I had hoped to convince him that the density and dynamism of the scientific catallaxy depends upon the scholarly ethics of individual participants. I am gratified that Boettke seems to have been persuaded that academic competition is more likely to yield intellectual progress if scholars are able to “see things through different perspectives and understand, rather than just dismiss, the frameworks of intellectual opponents” (Boettke this issue, 2). By way of response to the papers by Boettke, Roger Koppl, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Review of Austrian Economics Springer Journals

Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/specialists-and-citizens-all-a-reply-to-boettke-koppl-and-holcombe-gCKO3wRaL8
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Economics; Public Finance; Political Science; History of Economic Thought/Methodology
ISSN
0889-3047
eISSN
1573-7128
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11138-011-0146-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Rev Austrian Econ (2011) 24:71–76 DOI 10.1007/s11138-011-0146-4 Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe Robert F. Garnett Jr. Published online: 9 February 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 . . . Keywords Pluralism Republic of science Schools of thought Constitutional . . . . . . citizenship Rules Virtues Ethics Promiscuity Analytical egalitarianism James . . Buchanan Deirdre McCloskey Matt Ridley I am grateful to the Review of Austrian Economics and to Peter Boettke for welcoming this conversation about pluralism and Austrian economics. In my paper, “Why Should Austrian Economists be Pluralists?”, I highlighted an incongruity between Boettke's classical liberal vision of a free society and his vision of science as a free market (Boettke 2007). I had hoped to convince him that the density and dynamism of the scientific catallaxy depends upon the scholarly ethics of individual participants. I am gratified that Boettke seems to have been persuaded that academic competition is more likely to yield intellectual progress if scholars are able to “see things through different perspectives and understand, rather than just dismiss, the frameworks of intellectual opponents” (Boettke this issue, 2). By way of response to the papers by Boettke, Roger Koppl,

Journal

The Review of Austrian EconomicsSpringer Journals

Published: Feb 9, 2011

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off