Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe

Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe Rev Austrian Econ (2011) 24:71–76 DOI 10.1007/s11138-011-0146-4 Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe Robert F. Garnett Jr. Published online: 9 February 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 . . . Keywords Pluralism Republic of science Schools of thought Constitutional . . . . . . citizenship Rules Virtues Ethics Promiscuity Analytical egalitarianism James . . Buchanan Deirdre McCloskey Matt Ridley I am grateful to the Review of Austrian Economics and to Peter Boettke for welcoming this conversation about pluralism and Austrian economics. In my paper, “Why Should Austrian Economists be Pluralists?”, I highlighted an incongruity between Boettke's classical liberal vision of a free society and his vision of science as a free market (Boettke 2007). I had hoped to convince him that the density and dynamism of the scientific catallaxy depends upon the scholarly ethics of individual participants. I am gratified that Boettke seems to have been persuaded that academic competition is more likely to yield intellectual progress if scholars are able to “see things through different perspectives and understand, rather than just dismiss, the frameworks of intellectual opponents” (Boettke this issue, 2). By way of response to the papers by Boettke, Roger Koppl, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Review of Austrian Economics Springer Journals

Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/specialists-and-citizens-all-a-reply-to-boettke-koppl-and-holcombe-gCKO3wRaL8
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Economics; Public Finance; Political Science; History of Economic Thought/Methodology
ISSN
0889-3047
eISSN
1573-7128
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11138-011-0146-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Rev Austrian Econ (2011) 24:71–76 DOI 10.1007/s11138-011-0146-4 Specialists and citizens all: A reply to Boettke, Koppl, and Holcombe Robert F. Garnett Jr. Published online: 9 February 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 . . . Keywords Pluralism Republic of science Schools of thought Constitutional . . . . . . citizenship Rules Virtues Ethics Promiscuity Analytical egalitarianism James . . Buchanan Deirdre McCloskey Matt Ridley I am grateful to the Review of Austrian Economics and to Peter Boettke for welcoming this conversation about pluralism and Austrian economics. In my paper, “Why Should Austrian Economists be Pluralists?”, I highlighted an incongruity between Boettke's classical liberal vision of a free society and his vision of science as a free market (Boettke 2007). I had hoped to convince him that the density and dynamism of the scientific catallaxy depends upon the scholarly ethics of individual participants. I am gratified that Boettke seems to have been persuaded that academic competition is more likely to yield intellectual progress if scholars are able to “see things through different perspectives and understand, rather than just dismiss, the frameworks of intellectual opponents” (Boettke this issue, 2). By way of response to the papers by Boettke, Roger Koppl,

Journal

The Review of Austrian EconomicsSpringer Journals

Published: Feb 9, 2011

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off